Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 39 Documents
Search

SISTEM PERANCANGAN PERUNDANG - UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA DAN METODE OMNIBUS LAW: BERDASARKAN HUKUM KENEGARAAN Leonardy Julio Tanjaya; Rasji Rasji
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law is a system of rules thats been created and enforced through government to maintain everyindividual in the Country, This Research was aimed to examine the system that Indonesia have toestablished Law in Indonesia. Indonesia have their own Political Framework that separate eachinstitution on what their Rights and Obligation. In which in Indonesia Government Institution thathave the Rights and Obligation on making the first concepts until the Law become Legitimate Law isDPR (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat), The President, and DPD (Dewan Perwakilan Daerah) that have theRights to discuss or suggest on making an Law in Indonesia. In this Research is also aimed on to knowevery procedure that need to do such as any conference or meetings that every Government Instituitionthat have the Rights on making the Law, How many Conference that need to do, even on whatProcedure thats need to takes if the Meetings between each Goverments Instituition have made aresult. With Omnibus Bill or Omnibus Law Job Creation as one of the example.
ANGGOTA LEGISLATIF ADALAH DPR DAN PRESIDEN Cherlyne Baby Florencia; Rasji Rasji
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

There are several institutions in Indonesia.Indonesia adheres to a presidential system ofgovernment. In a presidential system, the head of government and head of state is the president.The institutions in the government order are the legislative, executive, and judicial. In carrying outhis duties the president is assisted by these institutions. In Indonesia, it is the DPR together withthe President that forms the law. The purpose of this study is to determine the position of the DPRand the President in the government system and to find out the pattern of the relationship betweenthe DPR and the President in carrying out legislative functions in Indonesia. The method in thisresearch is normative juridical. The results of the study show that the DPR together with thePresident have an equal position in carrying out their duties to form laws.
ANALISIS KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEWENANGAN LEMBAGA NEGARA Femmie Cynthia; Rasji Rasji
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

One of the authorities of the Constitutional Court based on Article 24C Paragraph 1 of the 1945Constitution is regarding the settlement of disputes over the authority of state institutions. However,not all state institutions in dispute can be resolved in the Constitutional Court. The purpose of thispaper is to analyze how the authority of the Constitutional Court is in resolving disputes over theauthority of state institutions and how it relates to dispute resolution on the authority of independentstate institutions. The research method used is legal research method with data collection techniques,namely based on legal literature related to the object of research. The legal materials used in thispaper are taken from primary legal materials in the form of legal norms or rules or statutoryprovisions as well as secondary legal materials such as books and related legal journals. TheConstitutional Court here in examining, adjudicating, and deciding a dispute on the authority of stateinstitutions considers the provisions or conditions related to subjectum litis and objectum litis. Thenbased on cases that occurred in Indonesia related to state institutions that can be applicants anddefendants in disputes over the authority of constitutional institutions are not only limited to the mainstate institutions, but other independent institutions whose authorities are regulated in theConstitution. Then only independent state institutions that have constitutional authority or areregulated in the 1945 Constitution can be resolved in the Constitutional Court.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA TERKAIT PERLINDUNGAN DAN PEMBATASAN KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT PADA DUNIA MAYA (CYBERSPACE) Richard Jatimulya Alam Wibowo; Rasji Rasji
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of information and communication technology has brought cyberspace to bemore relevant in the media for delivering opinions. In this case, the constitution mandates thegovernment to play a role in protecting, upholding, and guaranteeing human rights, one of whichis freedom of opinion. The research was conducted using a normative juridical method with astatutory approach, tracing primary and secondary legal sources in the form of legislation, journalarticles, and jurisprudence. Legislation not only guarantees freedom of expression as a humanright, but also provides limitations so that freedom of expression is not used to violate the rights ofothers. Article 28E paragraph (3), 28F, and 28I paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of theRepublic of Indonesia provide guarantees, while Article 28J paragraph (1) also provideslimitations. Furthermore, this limitation is given in the law which regulates the expression ofopinion in public, human rights, the press, as well as information and electronic transactions. Thattechnological developments not only bring convenience in expressing opinions, but also causeproblems due to the emergence of new actions and forms of expression that have never existedbefore. Therefore, this study aims to find gaps, shortcomings, and the need for regulationsregarding guarantees and restrictions on freedom of expression in cyberspace in the corridor ofhuman rights.
PENYELESAIAN KASUS SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH CACAT HUKUM MENURUT HUKUM PERTANAHAN DI INDONESIA (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 46/G/2019/PTUN-SRG) Agnelia Andini; Rasji Rasji
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The plaintiff submits a measurement request to the defendant. However, at the location of the plaintiff's proposed land there have been four certificates of land rights issued by the defendant. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the four State Administrative Officer Decrees. Basically, the plaintiff and the previous land owner have never registered the land they own, so the land should not have been certified. The four certificates that were issued also had defects and were not based on the right basis of rights which according to Indonesian land law should not have been issued. This research is a type of descriptive normative research. Sources of data used are primary, secondary, and tertiary data. The results of this study indicate that the defendant was negligent and careless in carrying out the responsibilities as a public servant in issuing certificates of land rights, resulting in the issuance of certificates of land rights that were flawed. The Defendant is administratively and civilly responsible. The conclusion from this study is that the plaintiff was harmed by the defendant who was the party authorized to issue the certificate.
PROSES PELAKSANAAN TUGAS KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM PEMERIKSAAN TERSANGKA MENURUT PERUNDANGAN INDONESIA Rasji Rasji; Dzikrina Aulia
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.464

Abstract

Tujuan dari pada penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui proses pelaksanaan tugas komisi pemberantasan korupsi dalam pemeriksaan tersangka menurut perundangan Indonesia. Metode yang yang digunakan penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan kaitannya pendekatan deskriptif, diaplikasikan menggunakan pendekatan perundang statute approach dimana peneliti memakai undang undang sebagai dasar melakukan analisis. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu komisi pemberantasan korupsi merupakan lembaga independen yang bebas daripada pengaruh kekuasaan, lantaran mengaplikasikan korupsi tidak serta merta sendiri peorangan melainkan beberapa orang kerap disebut berkelompok, membahas mengenai korupsi sudah pasti tidak akan ada habisnya, Banyaknya peraturan mengenai korupsi mengapa masih saja terus terjadi kegiatan yang keji ini sudah terlihat jelas, bahwa kegiatan ini sungguh merugikan sangat amat merugikan, tingkat kerugikan Indonesia pada tahun 2022 menurut Indonesia corruption watch (ICW), kerugian negara akibat tindak pidana korupsi ini terjadi karena 252 kasus korupsi dengan 612 tersangka dengan mencapai Rp. 33,665 trilun. Kemudian melaksanakan tugas komisi pemberantasan korupsi sebagaimana diatur dalam ayat (1) komisi pemberantasan korupsi berwenang memulai penyelidikan atau penyelesaian tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh kepolisian atau kejaksaan.
Implikasi Hukum Risalah Fiktif Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Terhadap Upaya Hukum Pemulihan Jabatan Notaris John Tiel Gosan; Rasji Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1201

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to find out the legal implications of fictitious minutes of the deed of statement of meeting decisions on legal efforts to restore the position of notary. This article uses normative legal research, with a statute approach and conceptual approach and descriptive qualitative research analysis with deductive thinking method. The legal implications of making fictitious minutes of the deed of meeting decision statement can be in the form of civil violations with the implication that the deed of meeting decision statement is declared cancelled and the notary will bear the material losses incurred, then the Notary can be charged with a crime, namely in the falsification of document data with the implication of imprisonment, and the last is charged with the code of ethics of the notary position which has implications for reprimands to dishonorable dismissal from the position of notary by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights as having the authority to appoint and dismiss notaries. The legal remedies that can be taken by notaries can only be done for violations of the code of ethics, namely by filing an objection or administrative appeal against the decision of the Ministry of Law and Human Right.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Dofana Givanti; Rasji Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1308

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to be able to know and analyse how the notary's liability for forgery of authentic deeds. This article uses normative research type with statutory research approach and conceptual approach, and uses descriptive qualitative data analysis with deductive thinking method. Criminal offences by notaries for the act of forgery of authentic deeds can be subject to sanctions contained in the Criminal Code with applicable provisions, in this case, namely the criminal act of forgery. Notaries who commit criminal offences must be punished, and the Criminal Code in general can be applied to the Notary in accordance with the principle of lex specialis derogate legi generali which is interpreted a contrario, namely as long as there is no regulation regarding criminal sanctions in the UUJN specifically, the provisions of general criminal sanctions (Criminal Code) will apply. Criminal responsibility carried out by the Notary, namely for the criminal act of forgery of authentic deeds, namely by going through the process in the Criminal Justice System related to the submission of allegations of forgery of authentic deeds starting from the investigation process to the trial. Falsification of an authentic deed made by a notary has implications for the authentic deed to be null and void.
Pembaharuan Hukum Terhadap Kekuatan Akta Autentik Elektronik Eli, Grace; Rasji Rasji
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.12116

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the legal force of authentic deeds made through electronic media (cyber notary) in the Indonesian legal system and examine the limits of notary authority in digital notarial practices. The urgency of this research lies in the need for legal reform to ensure the legality and effectiveness of cyber notary implementation without ignoring the principle of authenticity of the deed. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and legal doctrine to assess the conformity between positive legal norms and community practice. The results show that the practice of cyber notary can be legally recognised as long as all formal and material elements are fulfilled in accordance with the provisions of Article 1868 of the Civil Code. However, the absence of a special regulation that explicitly regulates the procedure for making deeds electronically creates a legal vacuum and potential disharmony between the Notary Office Law and electronic transaction regulations. This research recommends a regulatory update with the addition of special provisions in the Notary Office Law regarding the concept, scope, and implementation mechanism of cyber notary. The contribution of this research lies in offering a normative solution to the legitimisation of electronic authentic deeds in the national legal system.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kekuatan hukum akta autentik yang dibuat melalui media elektronik (cyber notary) dalam sistem hukum Indonesia serta menelaah batas kewenangan Notaris dalam praktik kenotariatan digital. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada kebutuhan pembaruan hukum untuk menjamin legalitas dan efektivitas implementasi cyber notary tanpa mengabaikan prinsip keautentikan akta. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan doktrin hukum untuk menilai kesesuaian antara norma hukum positif dengan praktik masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik cyber notary dapat diakui secara hukum sepanjang seluruh unsur formil dan materiil terpenuhi sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 1868 KUHPerdata. Namun, belum adanya regulasi khusus yang secara eksplisit mengatur prosedur pembuatan akta secara elektronik menimbulkan kekosongan hukum dan potensi disharmonisasi antara Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris dengan regulasi transaksi elektronik. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pembaruan regulasi dengan penambahan ketentuan khusus dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris mengenai konsep, ruang lingkup, dan mekanisme pelaksanaan cyber notary. Kontribusi penelitian ini terletak pada tawaran solusi normatif terhadap legitimasi akta autentik elektronik dalam sistem hukum nasional.