Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

KESALAHAN PROSES BERPIKIR MAHASISWA LAKI-LAKI DAN PEREMPUAN DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH GRUP Suesthi Rahayuningsih; Feriyanto Feriyanto
Journal of Mathematics Education and Science Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): Journal of Mathematics Education and Science
Publisher : Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri Bojonegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (694.091 KB) | DOI: 10.32665/james.v1iOctober.40

Abstract

The purposes of this research are 1) to describe the errors of thinking process of male student in solving group problems; 2) to describe the errors of thinking of female student in solving group problems. This research is an explorative research using a qualitative approach. Data collection is done by task-based interviews. The errors of thinking process based on indicators: fact errors, misconceptions, operating errors and principle errors in solving group problems. The data in this study are the results of interviews and group problem tests. The results of this research show that in fact errors, male subject experienced errors in interpreting the results obtained, whereas female students do not understand the symbols (H, #) and in the context of group symbols. In conceptual errors, the second subject is the same mistake, namely the error in explaining the group and the closed nature. Likewise, with operating errors, there is no significant difference in the second subject. In principle errors, the male subject does not associate the identity element obtained in the previous step in determining the inverse, while the female subject does not associate the set H and binary operations. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: 1) mendeskripsikan kesalahan proses berpikir mahasiswa laki-laki dalam memecahkan masalah grup; 2) mendeskripsikan kesalahan proses berpikir mahasiswa perempuan dalam memecahkan masalah grup. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksploratif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara berbasis tugas. Kesalahan proses berpikir berdasarkan indikator: kesalahan fakta, kesalahan konsep, kesalahan operasi dan kesalahan prinsip dalam memecahkan masalah grup. Data dalam penelitian ini berupa hasil wawancara dan tes masalah grup. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada kesalahan fakta, subjek laki-laki mengalami kesalahan menginterpretasikan hasil yang didapat, sedangkan subjek perempuan tidak memahami simbol (H, #) dan mengalami kesalahan dalam menuliskan simbol grup. Pada kesalahan konsep, kedua subjek mengalami kesalahan yang sama yaitu kesalahan dalam menjelaskan grup dan sifat tertutup. Demikian juga pada kesalahan operasi, tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan pada kedua subjek. Pada kesalahan prinsip, subjek laki-laki tidak mengkaitkan elemen identitas yang diperoleh di langkah sebelumnya dalam menentukan invers, sedangkan subjek perempuan tidak mengkaitkan himpunan H dan operasi biner.
Analisis Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Grup Ditinjau dari Gender Suesthi Rahayuningsih; Feriyanto Feriyanto
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Vol 3, No 12: DESEMBER 2018
Publisher : Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/jptpp.v3i12.12568

Abstract

Abstract: This research was aimed to (1) describe the thinking process of male students in solving group problems; (2) describe the thinking process of female students in solving group problems. This research was carried out at Universitas Islam Majapahit. Subjects in this study were one male student and one female student who had equivalent mathematics skills and comunicative. This research was an explorative research using a qualitative approach. Data collection was done by task-based interviews. The results showed significant differences between the two subjects. At the stage of understanding the problem, the male subject was better at understanding the symbols in the problem than the female subject. But the female subject was better at retelling the question than the male subject. At the stage of problem solving planning, female subject were more consistent in the use of concepts than male subject. At the stage of implementing the settlement plan, male subject were better at using principles and wrote symbol than female subject. At the stage of examining the completion of the female subject more systematically than the male subject.Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan (1) mendeskripsikan proses berpikir mahasiswa laki-laki dalam memecahkan masalah grup dan (2) mendeskripsikan proses berpikir mahasiswa perempuan dalam memecahkan masalah grup. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah satu mahasiswa laki-laki dan satu mahasiswa perempuan yang memiliki kemampuan matematika yang setara dan komunikatif. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksploratif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara berbasis tugas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan kedua subjek. Pada tahap memahami masalah, subjek laki-laki lebih baik dalam memahami simbol yang ada di soal daripada subjek perempuan. Akan tetapi, subjek perempuan lebih baik dalam menceritakan kembali soal yang diberikan daripada subjek laki-laki. Pada tahap merencanakan penyelesaian masalah, subjek perempuan lebih konsistensi dalam penggunaan konsep daripada subjek laki-laki. Pada tahap melaksanakan rencana penyelesaian, subjek laki-laki lebih baik dalam penggunaan prinsip dan menuliskan simbol daripada perempuan. Pada tahap memeriksa penyelesaian, subjek perempuan lebih sistematis daripada subjek laki-laki.
PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR GEOMETRI BERBASIS SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) UNTUK MENDUKUNG KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL RIZKY OKTAVIANA EKO PUTRI; FERIYANTO FERIYANTO
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (325.738 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.3141

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengembangkan bahan ajar geometri berbasis STEM untuk mahasiswa S1 jurusan pendidikan matematika. Terdapat tiga langkah utama yaitu Fase Pendahuluan, yaitu menganalisis masalah yang dihadapi mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran mata kuliah geometri. Pada tahap ini akan diperoleh permasalahan pokok yang dihadapi dan kebutuhan siswa dalam pembelajaran geometri. Fase Pengembangan merupakan tahap kedua dimana mengembangkan prototipe atau desain awal bahan ajar geometri berbasis materi STEM. Tahap terakhir yaitu Fase Penilaian atau tahap validasi dimana harus menganalisis apakah kualitas produk bahan ajar yang telah disiapkan memenuhi kriteria. Berdasarkan hasil analisis dapat disimpulkan bahwa bahan ajar geometri berbasis STEM layak digunakan dan efektif digunakan dalam pembelajaran untuk mendukung kemampuan spasial mahasiswa. Namun demi tercapainya hasil yang lebih memuaskan maka disarankan untuk membiasakan mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis STEM.The aim of this study was developing geometry learning material integrated by STEM principals for undergraduate students in mathematics education program. There were three main steps, Preliminary Research, analyzed the problems faced by students in learning geometry courses. At this stage it will be obtained the main problems encountered and the needs of students in learning geometry. Development Phase was the second step where researchers developed a prototype or the initial design of teaching materials based geometry STEM subjects. The last steps was Assessment Phase or validation phase where researchers should analyze whether the product quality teaching materials that have been prepared meet the criteria. Based on the data analysis can be concluded that STEM integrated geometry learning material is feasible and effective to be used in learning to support students' spatial abilities. However, in order to achieve more satisfying results, it is suggested to familiarize students with STEM-based learning.
Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Matematika melalui Pembelajaran Discovery Learning dengan Adaptasi Lesson Study Feriyanto Feriyanto; Ahmad Nafi'ul Abror; Dani Fernanda; Ira Rismawati
AIJER: Algazali International Journal Of Educational Research Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): OKTOBER (AIJER)
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Islam Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Improving Mathematics Learning Achievement through Learning Discovery Learning with Lesson Study Adaptation. The purpose of this study is to determine the application of the Lesson Study-Based Discovery Learning learning model to improve mathematics learning outcomes on the subject of Trigonometric Identity in class XI MIPA 4 semester 1 SMA Negeri 1 Gondang students for the 2022/2023 academic year. This research method uses a descriptive type of research using a qualitative approach. The subjects in this study were 34 students of class XI MIPA 4 SMAN 1 Gondang Mojokerto. The application of research is designed in accordance with the Lesson Study which consists of three stages, namely planning (Plan), implementation (Do), and evaluation (See). By using  the Discovery Learning Based Lesson Study learning model  , it can improve mathematics learning outcomes on the subject of Trigonometric Identity in class XI MIPA 4 semester 1 SMA Negeri 1 Gondang students for the 2022/2023 school year. This increase can be seen from the average score obtained by students, which is 70.60 on UH1, then increases to 81.78 on UH2. Keywords:  mathematics learning, discovery learning, lesson study
Pelatihan Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di SDN Mojoroto Jetis Mojokerto Feriyanto Feriyanto; Rizky Oktaviana Eko Putri; Taswirul Afkar
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dharma Andalas Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dharma Andalas
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Dharma Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1200.156 KB) | DOI: 10.47233/jpmda.v1i1.597

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has a big impact on the education sector. The learning process is not optimal because it cannot be done directly, so learning is getting left behind (learning loss). As a result, the Ministry of Education and Culture issued a policy related to a Merdeka’ curriculum. The Merdeka’ curriculum is a curriculum that focuses on essential content so that students are able to explore and strengthen concepts. SD Negeri Mojoroto is one of the elementary schools located on the border of Jetis and Dawar Blandong sub-districts. Based on observations, Mojoroto Elementary School teachers still have difficulty understanding the independent curriculum. Because it is still considered new and there has been no socialization from any party. The implementation method is the preparation stage, implementation stage and evaluation stage. As for the results of this activity, the preparation stage resulted in the need for an introduction to an independent curriculum, preparation of materials and service instruments. At the implementation stage, presentations and questions and answers were held. While the evaluation stage resulted in a questionnaire response of participants in the good category. And suggestions in the form of increasing the duration of the training and video appearances as well as ice breaking to attract the attention of participants.
Pelatihan Guru yang Tergabung dalam MGMP Matematika SMK se-Kabupaten Mojokerto dalam Implementasi PjBL untuk Mendukung Motivasi Belajar Siswa Deka Anjariyah; Feriyanto Feriyanto
Faedah : Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Agustus : Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia
Publisher : FKIP, Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/faedah.v1i3.298

Abstract

This study aims to increase teachers' knowledge about the Application of the Project Based Learning (PjBL) Model in learning mathematics so that it can support teachers' skills in preparing PjBL learning tools that motivate student learning. In this PKM activity, training and mentoring are collected in the preparation, implementation, and evaluation stages. The instruments used are observation sheets, questionnaire sheets, and training modules. Data analysis of this activity is descriptive qualitative. The results of the study show that training and mentoring activities for the implementation of the PjBL Model make a good contribution to increasing mastery of the material and increasing the ability of teachers to design PjBL learning tools that motivate student learning.
Developing Literacy and Numeracy-Based Mathematical Reasoning Question Items for High School Students Feriyanto Feriyanto; Deka Anjariyah; Taswirul Afkar
Epistema Vol 4, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/ep.v4i2.66119

Abstract

This study aims to describe the process and the result of developing literacy and numeracy-based mathematical reasoning questions for high school students in Mojokerto that are valid, practical, and effective. The subjects of this study are 12th-grade students at the public senior high school of Gondang. The research instruments are observation sheets, interview guidelines, response questionnaires, and mathematical reasoning ability tests. At the same time, the data analysis in this study is qualitative and quantitative. The result of this research is (1) In The preliminary stage, students' mathematical reasoning abilities still needed to improve with evidence of difficulties in identifying and relating the information provided to conclusions. The researchers and teachers determine the research subjects and research time. In the formative evaluation stage, for self-evaluation, the researcher analyzed the material and curriculum. The third stage is prototyping, consisting of expert review, one-to-one, small group, and field tests. In the expert review, prototype II was produced, which was very valid, with an overall average of 4.24. Three students were tested in the one-to-one, and three prototypes were built. A trial was conducted in the small group, and a prototype IV was produced. The field test, testing, and production of mathematical modules met the valid, practical, and effective criteria. (2) The study's findings include numeracy and literacy-based mathematical reasoning problems that satisfy the validity criteria with proper categories and the practical requirements with extremely positive standards, in addition to achieving the efficacy criterion of the questions through students' mathematical reasoning.