Articles
<![CDATA[The Right to Bequeath a Wife in a Polygamous Marriage According to The Compilation of Islamic Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Nadya Farras Indriati]]>;
<![CDATA[Febby Mutiara Nelson]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 3 (2022): August: Law Science and Field ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IHSA Institute ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (294.353 KB)
<![CDATA[Marriage in Islamic law adheres to an open monogamy system, where a man is allowed to have more than one wife. Marriage has an influence on inheritance. The legal consequences that arise due to death are the emergence of rights and obligations. One of the inheritance problems occurs because of polygamous marriages. So the formulation of the problem in this paper regarding the rights of a wife and child from polygamous marriages according to the Compilation of Islamic Law in the case of the decision of the Religious Court Number: XX /Pdt.G/2013/PA.Bks. This research was conducted using a normative juridical research method with secondary data collection sourced from books related to the distribution of inheritance in polygamous marriages, as well as looking at the normative aspects in Law Number 1 of 1974, Compilation of Islamic Law, Decision of the Bekasi Religious Court No. XX /Pdt.G/2013/PA.Bks. Data analysis in this study was carried out qualitatively with deductive conclusions. The conclusion of this study is that it is possible for wives from polygamous marriages to jointly obtain property and inheritance from their husbands as regulated in Article 190 of the Compilation of Islamic Law and children from polygamous marriages are entitled to inherit property.]]>
<![CDATA[Application of the Ultimum Remedium Principle in the Formulation of Legislation and Law Enforcement related to Banking Crimes ]]>
<![CDATA[Laras Adysti Nariswari]]>;
<![CDATA[Febby Mutiara Nelson]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): June: Law Science and Field ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IHSA Institute ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35335/legal.v12i2.811
<![CDATA[Banking crime is a special external criminal law or administrative penal law which in law enforcement should adhere to the principle of ultimum remedium. However, there is an article in the Banking Law which reflects that criminal sanctions can still be imposed even though OJK has given administrative sanctions to perpetrators of banking crimes. Thus it can be interpreted that the article is not in line with the formulation of the Banking Law as an administrative penal law, which in law enforcement should prioritize the principle of ultimum remedium. Implementation of this article results in the emergence of disparities and can potentially cause problems in the law enforcement system. This article discuss how to apply the ultimum remedium principle in the process of handling banking crimes with the existence of the article that is not in line, by looking at the principles of banking crime as an economic crime, using normative research methodology. To avoid potential differences in interpretation regarding the implementation of Article 52, paragraph (1) of the Banking Law, the wording of those article can be amended to explicitly state that the Banking Law adheres to the principle of ultimum remedium in accordance with its specific nature.]]>
<![CDATA[Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Surat Keterangan Waris Untuk Warga Negara Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Rizky Adi Nugraha]]>;
<![CDATA[Febby Mutiara Nelson]]>
<![CDATA[ Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Syntax Corporation ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (249.412 KB)
|
DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i6.8039
<![CDATA[Notaris sebagai pejabat yang diberi wewenang oleh negara untuk membuat bukti berupa perbuatan otentik, dengan berlakunya UU Administrasi Kependudukan, Notaris memiliki peran yang sangat penting dalam pembuatan sertifikat warisan. Peran notaris dalam distribusi hak waris memiliki peran penting dalam menentukan kehendak khusus, di mana orang yang mewariskan kepada satu atau lebih orang memberikan beberapa barangnya dari jenis tertentu. Warisan Islam tidak diberikan kepada notaris. Notaris memiliki kewenangan dalam pembagian warisan Islam tetapi yang memiliki kewenangan penuh untuk menentukan pengakuan dan pemutusan hukum adalah pengadilan. Notaris dalam pembagian warisan berperan dalam pembuatan Akta Pernyataan Warisan dan Sertifikat Warisan. Dalam hal terjadi perselisihan, Notaris dapat membuat akta perdamaian dan/atau perjanjian untuk membebaskan klaim tersebut.]]>
<![CDATA[Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, United Kingdom dan Malaysia : Suatu Kajian Perbandingan ]]>
<![CDATA[Athika Salsabilla Harahap]]>;
<![CDATA[Febby Mutiara Nelson]]>
<![CDATA[ Simbur Cahaya Volume 30 Nomor 1, Juni 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sriwijaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/sc.v30i1.2820
<![CDATA[Korupsi di Indonesia lebih dikenal sebagai tindak pidana yang sangat merugikan keuangan dan/atau perekonomian negara sehingga memiliki dampak dalam menghambat pertumbuhan dan kelangsungan pembangunan nasional, padahal konsep korupsi ini mencakup arti atau makna yang sangat luas, lebih luas dari tindak pidana yang merugikan keuangan dan/atau perekonomian negara seperti yang dikenal di Indonesia saat ini. Artikel ini akan melakukan studi komparatif dengan membandingkan dan menganalisis tentang jenis tindak pidana korupsi dan konsep sanksi pidana yang diatur di dalam Undang-Undang 31 tahun 1999 jo Undang-Undang Tahun 20 tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, UK Bribery Act 2010 (United Kingdom), dan Akta Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia 2009 (Akta SPRM 2009) atau Akta 694 (Malaysia). Studi ini menemukan bahwa masing-masing dari ketentuan antisuap United Kingdom dan Malaysia tersebut memiliki beragam perbedaan mulai dari jenis tindak pidana korupsi yang diatur sampai kepada konsep sanksi pidana yang dirumuskan di dalam delik, sehingga nantinya diharapkan dengan adanya studi komparatif ini dapat dijadikan referensi prospektif bagi pengaturan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia ke depannya. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif/penelitian hukum doctrinal yang menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach).]]>
<![CDATA[Finding the Truth in A Virtual Courtroom: Criminal Trials in Indonesia during the COVID-19 ]]>
<![CDATA[Febby Mutiara Nelson]]>;
<![CDATA[Intan Hendrawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Rafiqa Qurrata A’yun]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2465.pp228-243
<![CDATA[Video conferencing through video call platforms, such as Zoom and Google Meet, has become a useful option for judges holding criminal trials during the COVID-19 pandemic in many countries. This trend also occurred in Indonesia. Some judges believe that video conferencing technology will help them accomplish justice in an emergency, referring to the legal maxim 'salus populi suprema lex esto’ or ‘let the welfare of the people be the supreme law’. Although virtual trials assist courts in preventing the spread of the deadly virus, they have also affected the work of judges to reach the substantive truth. This paper examines the challenges concerning the rights of the accused and technological matters that have emerged under the use of virtual courtrooms and, in some ways, led to unfair trial procedures. We argue that the absence of laws that regulate virtual courtrooms, along with an outdated the Code of Criminal Procedure in Indonesia (KUHAP), can lead to miscarriages of justice. The arguments presented in this article are based on survey data conducted from December 2020 to January 2021. The respondents are judges from Indonesia's western, middle, and eastern regions who used video conference facilities for criminal court hearings during the COVID-19 outbreak of 2020-2021.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementation of the Roskill Model in the Mechanism for Handling Large-Scale Fraud Crimes in Indonesia? ]]>
<![CDATA[Pricilla Amelinda Jacob]]>;
<![CDATA[Febby Mutiara Nelson]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i01.p07
<![CDATA[The necessity for a specialized unit to address large-scale fraud crimes is grounded upon the increasing prevalence of such crimes and the substantial losses incurred by victims. Large-scale fraud crimes, characterized by money laundering as a follow-up crime, have become increasingly challenging to prosecute, with the assets derived from these crimes becoming harder to trace due to globalization. Disproportionate restitution proportions reflect the challenges in tracing criminal assets. There exists a strong correlation between successfully traced assets and the amount returned to victims of these crimes. The proposal to utilize the Roskill Model in handling large-scale fraud crimes is based on an economic analysis approach to its suitability in law enforcement efforts, while maintaining a focus on the restitution rights of victims without compromising the efficiency of the criminal justice system. The Roskill Model can internalize the external costs generated by these crimes. This model has been implemented in various countries, including the UK, New Zealand, and India, demonstrating its effectiveness and efficiency in addressing serious and complex financial crimes. The Roskill Model's applicability in Indonesia is considered feasible, guided by principles of swift, simple, and cost-effective justice, along with efforts to reform Indonesian criminal procedural law for greater efficiency. This research employs an economic analysis of law (EAL) with an interdisciplinary approach encompassing both legal and economic disciplines. Additionally, the study includes a comparative legal analysis with the UK (common law system) and Switzerland (civil law system).]]>
<![CDATA[Politik Hukum Agraria untuk Hak Atas Tanah Ulayat bagi Pemenuhan HAM dan Kepentingan Publik ]]>
<![CDATA[Murni, Hidayati]]>;
<![CDATA[Nelson, Febby Mutiara]]>
<![CDATA[ AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol 5 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2154
<![CDATA[The political direction of agrarian law with regard to customary law and customary rights (beschikkingsrecht) of indigenous peoples during the Dutch colonial period wanted to unify and codify land law that applied to all groups of people based on the principle of concordance, but failed miserably, so that the pluralism policy was still applied. The current problem is in contemporary Indonesia, so it can be predicted that the prospect of pluralist customary rights of indigenous peoples must be maintained because it is in line with the mandate of the constitution in the upcoming reform era in the face of globalization by combining with efforts to reform agrarian law and land law through research on the political direction of customary rights law for the fulfillment of human rights or the public interest, The research method used by the author to conduct research is Juridical Nomaritf, the results of research in this study need to be followed up by mapping customary rights according to the rules of Geodesy, so that it is clear the extent of customary rights areas in the archipelago and ultimately can contribute to supporting the existence and legal certainty of customary rights in particular and land law for the public interest which will provide fulfillment of human rights.]]>
<![CDATA[Antara Tuntutan dan Kesepakatan: BLBI dan Era Deferred Prosecution Agreement ]]>
<![CDATA[Simanjuntak, Melva Retta Ruby]]>;
<![CDATA[Nelson, Febby Mutiara]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This article discusses the settlement of criminal cases through Deferred Prosecution Agreement (“DPA”) procedures, particularly in the context of the Bantuan Likuiditas Bank Indonesia (“BLBI”) Case. The purpose of this discussion is to find a mechanism for settling criminal cases that aligns with principles of simple, fast, and cost-effective justice, especially in cases involving corporations. The focus of the article includes two aspects: the impact of using DPA mechanisms in resolving criminal cases and the impact of using DPA mechanisms in improving the efficiency of BLBI case resolution. The method used in this research is a doctrinal study focusing on research regarding rules, principles, and norms related to the settlement of criminal cases, specifically using the DPA mechanism. In the BLBI case, it is known that the case was settled through a non-criminal mechanism using the Master Settlement Acquisition Agreement (“MSAA”). MSAA is an application of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”) mechanism because there was no involvement of Prosecutors and Courts in drafting the MSAA. If at that time the government had chosen the DPA mechanism, the settlement of the BLBI case could have been faster. This is because in DPA, Prosecutors can immediately prosecute if the party fails to comply with the terms of the agreement within the specified time. Thus, it would no longer be necessary to involve the criminal justice system process starting from the investigation stage. Keywords: Deferred Prosecution Agreement (“DPA”), BLBI case, corporations.]]>
<![CDATA[Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Responsif ]]>
<![CDATA[Ayuningsih, Irma Reisalinda]]>;
<![CDATA[Nelson, Febby Mutiara]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): OCTOBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26623/jic.v7i2.5142
<![CDATA[This research aims to analyze the implementation of asset forfeiture resulting from criminal acts in Indonesia and compare it with implementation in Australia from a responsive legal perspective. The results of this comparison are expected to provide solutions to the problem of implementing asset forfeiture in Indonesia. This research needs to be discussed more because the practice of asset forfeiture in Indonesia cannot recover state financial losses. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical research method using legal comparisons. The novelty of this study is to compare the implementation of non-conviction based asset forfeiture in Australia and add examples of criminal cases. This research concluded that the asset forfeiture with criminal forfeiture in Indonesia implemented based on existing laws and regulations have not been able to accommodate the social needs of the community in the return of state financial losses, as practiced in Australia. Therefore, Indonesia needs to establish a law on non-conviction based asset forfeiture whose regulatory material refers to the 36 (thirty-six) key concepts of non-conviction based asset forfeiture. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan perampasan aset hasil tindak pidana di Indonesia dan membandingkannya dengan pelaksanaan di Australia ditinjau dari perspektif hukum responsif. Hasil perbandingan ini diharapkan memberikan solusi atas permasalahan pelaksanaan perampasan aset di Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh praktik pelaksanaan perampasan aset hasil tindak pidana di Indonesia yang tidak dapat mengembalikan kerugian keuangan negara. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan perbandingan hukum. Kebaruan dari penelitian ini adalah dengan membandingkan pelaksanaan perampasan aset tanpa pemidanaan di Australia serta menambahkan contoh kasus tindak pidana. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perampasan aset dengan pemidanaan atau criminal forfeiture di Indonesia yang dilaksanakan berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku saat ini belum dapat mengakomodir kebutuhan sosial masyarakat dalam pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara, sebagaimana dipraktikkan di Australia. Indonesia perlu membentuk suatu peraturan perundang-undangan perampasan aset tanpa pemidanaan yang materi pengaturannya mengacu pada 36 (tiga puluh enam) konsep kunci perampasan aset tanpa pemidanaan. ]]>
<![CDATA[Factors of politeness as reason for mitigation in judge's decision: Is it still relevant to be maintained? ]]>
<![CDATA[Nelson, Febby Mutiara]]>;
<![CDATA[Saputra, Rakha Naufal]]>
<![CDATA[ Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law Vol. 3 No. 1: (July) 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.61511/eaebjol.v3i1.2025.1847
<![CDATA[Background: Judges play a crucial role in the judicial process. According to Article 1 point 8 of Law Number 8 of 1981 on Criminal Procedure (KUHAP), a judge is a state official authorized to adjudicate cases. Their duties include examining, deciding, and resolving cases. In making decisions, judges consider both aggravating and mitigating factors. Aggravating factors may include the defendant having previous convictions, while mitigating factors may include polite behavior during court proceedings. This article focuses on polite behavior as a mitigating factor. It explores how judges assess politeness in court and whether this factor remains relevant in modern criminal case decisions. Methods: To answer this problem, the author researches using the socio-legal method, where the author will examine the problem with legal norms governing polite elements as a reason for mitigation and supported by surveys to support data from existing norms and decisions related to this matter. Findings: Judges still consider the element of modesty as a reason to mitigate punishment in criminal cases. From the results of a survey of 76 judges from 64 courts, 49 respondents stated that the element of civility is still relevant to be maintained in the judicial process. Factors considered by judges as indicators of the defendant's civility in court include polite language, cooperative attitude, and non-verbal expressions that show respect for the trial process. Conclusion: This research shows that the element of modesty is still considered relevant by the majority of judges as a mitigating consideration. The defendant's demeanor in court can signal remorse and good faith which influences the judge's decision. Novelty/Originality of this article: This research combines a normative approach and socio-legal methods that are rarely used in the study of mitigating circumstances. A survey of 76 judges from different regions and ethnic backgrounds in Indonesia provides valuable insights into the actual practice of civility considerations in trials. This article confirms that the relevance of modesty is not just a formal tradition, but also reflects important social and cultural dynamics in the judicial process in Indonesia.]]>
