Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.161
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Sriwijaya Law Review Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Hasanuddin Law Review Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Ius Constituendum Undang: Jurnal Hukum Nagari Law Review JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Media Iuris Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal of Law Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Journal of Law and Legal Reform JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Nelson, Febby Mutiara
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia Kampus UI Depok, Depok, Jawa Barat, 16424 Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
The Right to Bequeath a Wife in a Polygamous Marriage According to The Compilation of Islamic Law Nadya Farras Indriati; Febby Mutiara Nelson
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 3 (2022): August: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (294.353 KB)

Abstract

Marriage in Islamic law adheres to an open monogamy system, where a man is allowed to have more than one wife.  Marriage has an influence on inheritance.  The legal consequences that arise due to death are the emergence of rights and obligations.  One of the inheritance problems occurs because of polygamous marriages.  So the formulation of the problem in this paper regarding the rights of a wife and child from polygamous marriages according to the Compilation of Islamic Law in the case of the decision of the Religious Court Number: XX /Pdt.G/2013/PA.Bks.  This research was conducted using a normative juridical research method with secondary data collection sourced from books related to the distribution of inheritance in polygamous marriages, as well as looking at the normative aspects in Law Number 1 of 1974, Compilation of Islamic Law, Decision of the Bekasi Religious Court  No.  XX /Pdt.G/2013/PA.Bks.  Data analysis in this study was carried out qualitatively with deductive conclusions.  The conclusion of this study is that it is possible for wives from polygamous marriages to jointly obtain property and inheritance from their husbands as regulated in Article 190 of the Compilation of Islamic Law and children from polygamous marriages are entitled to inherit property.
Application of the Ultimum Remedium Principle in the Formulation of Legislation and Law Enforcement related to Banking Crimes Laras Adysti Nariswari; Febby Mutiara Nelson
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): June: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v12i2.811

Abstract

Banking crime is a special external criminal law or administrative penal law which in law enforcement should adhere to the principle of ultimum remedium. However, there is an article in the Banking Law which reflects that criminal sanctions can still be imposed even though OJK has given administrative sanctions to perpetrators of banking crimes. Thus it can be interpreted that the article is not in line with the formulation of the Banking Law as an administrative penal law, which in law enforcement should prioritize the principle of ultimum remedium. Implementation of this article results in the emergence of disparities and can potentially cause problems in the law enforcement system. This article discuss how to apply the ultimum remedium principle in the process of handling banking crimes with the existence of the article that is not in line, by looking at the principles of banking crime as an economic crime, using normative research methodology. To avoid potential differences in interpretation regarding the implementation of Article 52, paragraph (1) of the Banking Law, the wording of those article can be amended to explicitly state that the Banking Law adheres to the principle of ultimum remedium in accordance with its specific nature.
Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Surat Keterangan Waris Untuk Warga Negara Indonesia Rizky Adi Nugraha; Febby Mutiara Nelson
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (249.412 KB) | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i6.8039

Abstract

Notaris sebagai pejabat yang diberi wewenang oleh negara untuk membuat bukti berupa perbuatan otentik, dengan berlakunya UU Administrasi Kependudukan, Notaris memiliki peran yang sangat penting dalam pembuatan sertifikat warisan. Peran notaris dalam distribusi hak waris memiliki peran penting dalam menentukan kehendak khusus, di mana orang yang mewariskan kepada satu atau lebih orang memberikan beberapa barangnya dari jenis tertentu. Warisan Islam tidak diberikan kepada notaris. Notaris memiliki kewenangan dalam pembagian warisan Islam tetapi yang memiliki kewenangan penuh untuk menentukan pengakuan dan pemutusan hukum adalah pengadilan. Notaris dalam pembagian warisan berperan dalam pembuatan Akta Pernyataan Warisan dan Sertifikat Warisan. Dalam hal terjadi perselisihan, Notaris dapat membuat akta perdamaian dan/atau perjanjian untuk membebaskan klaim tersebut.
Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, United Kingdom dan Malaysia : Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Athika Salsabilla Harahap; Febby Mutiara Nelson
Simbur Cahaya Volume 30 Nomor 1, Juni 2023
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v30i1.2820

Abstract

Korupsi di Indonesia lebih dikenal sebagai tindak pidana yang sangat merugikan keuangan dan/atau perekonomian negara sehingga memiliki dampak dalam menghambat pertumbuhan dan kelangsungan pembangunan nasional, padahal konsep korupsi ini mencakup arti atau makna yang sangat luas, lebih luas dari tindak pidana yang merugikan keuangan dan/atau perekonomian negara seperti yang dikenal di Indonesia saat ini. Artikel ini akan melakukan studi komparatif dengan membandingkan dan menganalisis tentang jenis tindak pidana korupsi dan konsep sanksi pidana yang diatur di dalam Undang-Undang 31 tahun 1999 jo Undang-Undang Tahun 20 tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, UK Bribery Act 2010 (United Kingdom), dan Akta Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia 2009 (Akta SPRM 2009) atau Akta 694 (Malaysia). Studi ini menemukan bahwa masing-masing dari ketentuan antisuap United Kingdom dan Malaysia tersebut memiliki beragam perbedaan mulai dari jenis tindak pidana korupsi yang diatur sampai kepada konsep sanksi pidana yang dirumuskan di dalam delik, sehingga nantinya diharapkan dengan adanya studi komparatif ini dapat dijadikan referensi prospektif bagi pengaturan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia ke depannya. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif/penelitian hukum doctrinal yang menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach).
Finding the Truth in A Virtual Courtroom: Criminal Trials in Indonesia during the COVID-19 Febby Mutiara Nelson; Intan Hendrawati; Rafiqa Qurrata A’yun
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2465.pp228-243

Abstract

Video conferencing through video call platforms, such as Zoom and Google Meet, has become a useful option for judges holding criminal trials during the COVID-19 pandemic in many countries. This trend also occurred in Indonesia. Some judges believe that video conferencing technology will help them accomplish justice in an emergency, referring to the legal maxim 'salus populi suprema lex esto’ or ‘let the welfare of the people be the supreme law’. Although virtual trials assist courts in preventing the spread of the deadly virus, they have also affected the work of judges to reach the substantive truth. This paper examines the challenges concerning the rights of the accused and technological matters that have emerged under the use of virtual courtrooms and, in some ways, led to unfair trial procedures. We argue that the absence of laws that regulate virtual courtrooms, along with an outdated the Code of Criminal Procedure in Indonesia (KUHAP), can lead to miscarriages of justice. The arguments presented in this article are based on survey data conducted from December 2020 to January 2021. The respondents are judges from Indonesia's western, middle, and eastern regions who used video conference facilities for criminal court hearings during the COVID-19 outbreak of 2020-2021.
Implementation of the Roskill Model in the Mechanism for Handling Large-Scale Fraud Crimes in Indonesia? Pricilla Amelinda Jacob; Febby Mutiara Nelson
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i01.p07

Abstract

The necessity for a specialized unit to address large-scale fraud crimes is grounded upon the increasing prevalence of such crimes and the substantial losses incurred by victims. Large-scale fraud crimes, characterized by money laundering as a follow-up crime, have become increasingly challenging to prosecute, with the assets derived from these crimes becoming harder to trace due to globalization. Disproportionate restitution proportions reflect the challenges in tracing criminal assets. There exists a strong correlation between successfully traced assets and the amount returned to victims of these crimes. The proposal to utilize the Roskill Model in handling large-scale fraud crimes is based on an economic analysis approach to its suitability in law enforcement efforts, while maintaining a focus on the restitution rights of victims without compromising the efficiency of the criminal justice system. The Roskill Model can internalize the external costs generated by these crimes. This model has been implemented in various countries, including the UK, New Zealand, and India, demonstrating its effectiveness and efficiency in addressing serious and complex financial crimes. The Roskill Model's applicability in Indonesia is considered feasible, guided by principles of swift, simple, and cost-effective justice, along with efforts to reform Indonesian criminal procedural law for greater efficiency. This research employs an economic analysis of law (EAL) with an interdisciplinary approach encompassing both legal and economic disciplines. Additionally, the study includes a comparative legal analysis with the UK (common law system) and Switzerland (civil law system).
Politik Hukum Agraria untuk Hak Atas Tanah Ulayat bagi Pemenuhan HAM dan Kepentingan Publik Murni, Hidayati; Nelson, Febby Mutiara
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol 5 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2154

Abstract

The political direction of agrarian law with regard to customary law and customary rights (beschikkingsrecht) of indigenous peoples during the Dutch colonial period wanted to unify and codify land law that applied to all groups of people based on the principle of concordance, but failed miserably, so that the pluralism policy was still applied. The current problem is in contemporary Indonesia, so it can be predicted that the prospect of pluralist customary rights of indigenous peoples must be maintained because it is in line with the mandate of the constitution in the upcoming reform era in the face of globalization by combining with efforts to reform agrarian law and land law through research on the political direction of customary rights law for the fulfillment of human rights or the public interest, The research method used by the author to conduct research is Juridical Nomaritf, the results of research in this study need to be followed up by mapping customary rights according to the rules of Geodesy, so that it is clear the extent of customary rights areas in the archipelago and ultimately can contribute to supporting the existence and legal certainty of customary rights in particular and land law for the public interest which will provide fulfillment of human rights.
Antara Tuntutan dan Kesepakatan: BLBI dan Era Deferred Prosecution Agreement Simanjuntak, Melva Retta Ruby; Nelson, Febby Mutiara
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article discusses the settlement of criminal cases through Deferred Prosecution Agreement (“DPA”) procedures, particularly in the context of the Bantuan Likuiditas Bank Indonesia (“BLBI”) Case. The purpose of this discussion is to find a mechanism for settling criminal cases that aligns with principles of simple, fast, and cost-effective justice, especially in cases involving corporations. The focus of the article includes two aspects: the impact of using DPA mechanisms in resolving criminal cases and the impact of using DPA mechanisms in improving the efficiency of BLBI case resolution. The method used in this research is a doctrinal study focusing on research regarding rules, principles, and norms related to the settlement of criminal cases, specifically using the DPA mechanism. In the BLBI case, it is known that the case was settled through a non-criminal mechanism using the Master Settlement Acquisition Agreement (“MSAA”). MSAA is an application of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”) mechanism because there was no involvement of Prosecutors and Courts in drafting the MSAA. If at that time the government had chosen the DPA mechanism, the settlement of the BLBI case could have been faster. This is because in DPA, Prosecutors can immediately prosecute if the party fails to comply with the terms of the agreement within the specified time. Thus, it would no longer be necessary to involve the criminal justice system process starting from the investigation stage. Keywords: Deferred Prosecution Agreement (“DPA”), BLBI case, corporations.
Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Responsif Ayuningsih, Irma Reisalinda; Nelson, Febby Mutiara
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): OCTOBER
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v7i2.5142

Abstract

This research aims to  analyze  the implementation of asset forfeiture resulting from criminal acts in Indonesia and compare it with implementation in Australia from a responsive legal perspective. The results of this comparison are expected to provide solutions to the problem of implementing asset forfeiture in Indonesia. This research needs to be discussed more because the practice of asset forfeiture in Indonesia cannot recover state financial losses. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical research method using legal comparisons. The novelty of this study is to compare the implementation of  non-conviction  based asset forfeiture  in Australia and add examples of criminal cases. This research concluded that the asset forfeiture with criminal forfeiture in Indonesia  implemented based on existing laws and regulations have not been able to accommodate the social needs of the community in the return of state financial losses, as practiced in Australia. Therefore, Indonesia needs to establish a law on  non-conviction based asset forfeiture  whose regulatory material refers to the 36 (thirty-six) key concepts of  non-conviction  based asset forfeiture.  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan perampasan aset hasil tindak pidana di Indonesia dan membandingkannya dengan pelaksanaan di Australia ditinjau dari perspektif hukum responsif. Hasil perbandingan ini diharapkan memberikan solusi atas permasalahan pelaksanaan perampasan aset di Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh praktik pelaksanaan perampasan aset hasil tindak pidana di Indonesia yang tidak dapat mengembalikan kerugian keuangan negara. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan perbandingan hukum. Kebaruan dari penelitian ini adalah dengan membandingkan pelaksanaan perampasan aset tanpa pemidanaan di Australia serta menambahkan contoh kasus tindak pidana. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perampasan aset dengan pemidanaan atau criminal forfeiture di Indonesia yang dilaksanakan berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku saat ini belum dapat mengakomodir kebutuhan sosial masyarakat dalam pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara, sebagaimana dipraktikkan di Australia. Indonesia perlu membentuk suatu peraturan perundang-undangan perampasan aset tanpa pemidanaan yang materi pengaturannya mengacu pada 36 (tiga puluh enam) konsep kunci perampasan aset tanpa pemidanaan.  
Financial Service Provider and Online Sexual Exploitation of Children: A Lacunae in Indonesia Legal Framework? Nelson, Febby Mutiara; Santoso, Topo
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): January, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i1.14264

Abstract

Online sexual abuse and exploitation of children is a serious global issue nowadays. In Indonesia, data from the Ministry of Women’s Empowerment and Child Protection (KemenPPA) shows that the number of reported child violence cases reached 24,158 in 2023. Of this total, sexual violence was the most common, with 10,932 cases. The key problem lies in the gap within the Legal Framework for addressing Child Sexual Exploitation in Indonesia. The issue is becoming more serious because the financial sector also plays a role, as perpetrators use financial means to carry out their actions. This has not been adequately addressed by Indonesia’s legal framework. Although Indonesia has prohibited and imposed penalties for perpetrators of child sexual exploitation and online sexual exploitation (for example, through the Criminal Code, Child Protection Law, Law on Sexual Violence, Pornography Law, and Electronic Information and Transactions Law), efforts to address the misuse of the financial sector by perpetrators have not been reflected in laws governing the financial services sector (such as the Indonesia Financial Services Authority Law, Banking Law, Indonesia Financial Services Authority Regulations, etc.). This paper, through a doctrinal research approach, examines the extent to which Indonesia’s legal framework addresses child sexual exploitation in accordance with international standards, conventions, trends, and developments. By analyzing how other countries—such as England, Wales, Sweden, the United States, and Australia—handle child sexual exploitation, particularly in relation to financial service providers, Indonesia can learn valuable lessons. In conclusion, this paper finds that Indonesia’s legal framework is insufficient to address child sexual exploitation and abuse involving financial means.
Co-Authors Aini, Abni Nur Andini, Priska Putri Anisa, Tasya Annisa Maudi Arsela Ari, Fransiska Athika Salsabilla Harahap Ayuningsih, Irma Reisalinda Azalia Delicia Dumanauw Basry, Arianisti Zulhanita Putri Choky Risda Ramadhan, Choky Risda Danusubroto, Alexia Sonia Edwin Ligasetiawan Emilka Nuradanta Fatmawati Parenrengi Intan Hendrawati Laras Adysti Nariswari Leonardus Agung Putra Utama Murni, Hidayati Nadya Farras Indriati Novian, Muhammad Panji Purnama Pardede, Sonora Gokma Pasaribu, Juwita Patty Pricilla Amelinda Jacob Prosperiani, Maria Dianita Rafiqa Qurrata A’yun Riska Ruth Verarussy Rizky Adi Nugraha Saputra, Rakha Naufal Simanjuntak, Melva Retta Ruby Sondang, Esther Melinia Tasya Anisa Topo Santoso