Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

PENERAPAN SANKSI PRAKTIK BISNIS CURANG SEBAGAI UPAYA MELINDUNGI KONSUME: SUATU KAJIAN PERBANDINGAN INDONESIA DENGAN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM Basry, Arianisti Zulhanita Putri; Nelson, Febby Mutiara
JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol 6, No 3 (2022): JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jisip.v6i3.3354

Abstract

Perlindungan konsumen merupakan suatu sistem yang sangat penting dalam menjamin keselamatan maupun hak-hak dari konsumen pada saat melakukan transaksi jual-beli guna memenuhi kebutuhan sehari-harinya. Indonesia telah menetapkan Undang-Undang Perlindungan konsumen sebagai landasan hukum yang berlaku sebagai cara preventif dan kuratif dalam melindungi hak konsumen. Seperti halnya Indonesia, Brunei Darussalam sebagai sebuah negara juga memberikan beberapa pengaturan mengenai perlindungan konsumen. Hal ini ditujukan sebagai upaya dari negara Brunei Darussalam sendiri dalam menjamin maupun melindungi seluruh rakyat Brunei Darussalam yang berperan sebagai konsumen. Maka jurnal ini akan melakukan penelitian perbandingan peraturan sanksi atas pelanggaran di bidang hukum perlindungan konsumen di Indonesia dan Brunei Darussalam serta bagaimana contoh penerapan sanksi atas pelanggaran di bidang hukum perlindungan konsumen baik itu di Indonesia maupun di negara Brunei Darussalam
Asset Forfeiture through Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture and Management of Criminal Proceeds Assets: A Comparative Study with the United States and Thailand Anisa, Tasya; Nelson, Febby Mutiara
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4183

Abstract

Confiscation is based on the principle that the proceeds of crime must be confiscated, because the convicted person should not benefit from the crime he committed. The procedure for handling confiscated property is something that needs to be regulated. So it is very important in a rule to determine who is responsible for taking the seized goods and holding them, where they should be stored, and what will be done with them. This paper compares and contrasts the NCB non-conviction based asset forfeiture rules owned by Indonesia, the United States and Thailand as well as the responsibilities in managing assets based on the results of confiscation and confiscation owned by these countries. The selection of the United States as a comparison country in this paper is based on the fact that countries that adhere to the common law legal system have commonly practiced the concept of NCB asset forfeiture as an activity in confiscating and seizing assets and the United States has been implementing the concept for decades. While in the Southeast Asian region, Thailand is one of the countries that has long implemented the concept of NCB asset forfeiture and has an independent institution
INITIAL COIN OFFERINGS AS AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR RAISING CAPITAL: LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS AND REGULATORY SOLUTIONS IN INDONESIA Pasaribu, Juwita Patty; Nelson, Febby Mutiara; Santoso, Topo; Ari, Fransiska
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 15, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Blockchain technology has been used in various sectors, notably in facilitating crypto asset transactions, specifically for processing an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) or token sales that were first introduced in 2013. In Indonesia, it can be observed that there are several legal issues in the execution that expose them to potential misuse in the ICO transaction, leading to criminal activities. Additionally, Indonesia was ranked as the second-highest country in the world to experience crypto asset fraud schemes in 2019. To address legal issues related to ICO, this study aims to provide a comprehensive legal assessment of ICO as a modern technology-based approach that is commonly used for raising organizational capital through the issuance of tokens. Following an analysis of the legal vulnerabilities in ICO and their impacts on the public, this study mainly proposes to regulate ICO in capital market law, which includes preventive legal measures and fundamental legal principles to protect the public. This study, using a comparative method, also explores the global prevalence and negativities associated with ICO, examines regulatory frameworks related to ICO in Switzerland and the United States, and identifies legal issues in the general use of blockchain technology, as well as emphasizes the needs of the Indonesian government’s response toin ensuring lawful legal certainty for legal actionICO, using a comparative method. Based on this assessment, it can be argued that strengthening the regulatory framework for ions of ICO, particularly in Indonesia, is crucial in preventing criminal actions related to in this transaction and ensuring legal protection as well as legal certainty for the public.