Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran
Sherly Ayuna Putri
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Upaya Hukum Banding Terhadap Putusan Verstek Yang Diajukan Oleh Pihak Tergugat Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Tinjauan HIR/RBG Sherly Ayuna Putri; Achmad Syauqi Nugraha
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (251.282 KB) | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v6i1.105

Abstract

The verdict of Verstek is the ruling that where the defendant, although called legitimately, does not come on a given day, and does not tell others to be facing his deputy, the claim is accepted with a decision without the presence (Verstek). Resistance is a legal effort against the verdict that was dropped outside the presence of the defendant. Essentially the resistance was provided for the defendant who (in general) was defeated. The Verzet is governed in article 125 paragraph (3) and 129 HIR, article 149 clause (3) Jo. 153 RBg. The research method which is conducted in this study is normative juridical research that emphasizes on the science of law and conduct an inventory of positive law relating to the effectiveness of statutory regulations in the fi eld of legal and descriptive analytical describing and analyzing the problems based on the legislation governing the law of civil proceedings regarding the legal efforts of Verstek decision. Based on the results of the study obtained fi rst problem of Verstek decision to be fi led by the defendant on the decision of the District Court of Bale Bandung Case Number: 37/PDT. G/2018/PN. BLB and the state court ruling of the Simalungun case number: 36/PDT. G/2013/PN. LICENSE does not conform to the norm in article 125 HIR and section 149 RBg. The two remedies that can be done by the plaintiff or the appeal is to apply for the appeal with the reasons set out in article 30 paragraph (1) of Law No. 5 of 2004 concerning the Supreme Court, among other things relating to the judge is not authorized or exceeds the limits of authority and or wrong in implementing or violating applicable laws.
PERSPEKTIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KETENAGAKERJAAN MELALUI PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DALAM MENGHADAPI MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN Agus Mulya Karsona; Sherly Ayuna Putri; Etty Mulyati; R. Kartikasari
Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): JURNAL POROS HUKUM PADJADJARAN
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jphp.v1i2.225

Abstract

ABSTRAKHubungan industrial yang merupakan keterkaitan kepentingan antara pekerja dengan pengusaha, berpotensi menimbulkan perbedaan pendapat, bahkan perselisihan antara kedua belah pihak. Sehubungan dengan itu perangkat Undang-Undang penyelesaian perselisihan perburuhan sangat diperlukan. Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial adalah perbedaan pendapat yang mengakibatkan pertentangan antara pengusaha atau gabungan pengusaha dengan pekerja/buruh atau serikat pekerja/serikat buruh karena adanya perselisihan mengenai hak, perselisihan kepentingan, perselisihan pemutusan hubungan kerja dan perselisihan antar serikat pekerja/serikat buruh dalam satu perusahaan. Keberadaan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial yang menggantikan kedudukan Panitia Penyelesaian Perselisihan Perburuhan ditandai dengan adanya perubahan mekanisme penyelesaian perselisihan perburuhan dimaksudkan agar proses penyelesaian perselisihan dapat dilaksanakan secara cepat, tepat, adil dan murah seiring dengan perkembangan era industrialisasi dan ilmu pengetahuan. Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial (PHI) adalah pengadilan khusus yang dibentuk di lingkungan pengadilan negeri yang berwenang memeriksa, mengadili dan memberi putusan terhadap perselisihan hubungan industrial. Penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial perlu dilaksanakan secara cepat, karena berkaitan dengan proses produksi dan terciptanya hubungan industrial yang harmonis dalam suatu hubungan kerja. Dalam rangka menghadapi era Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA) perlu dipersiapkan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial yang mampu menyelesaikan sengketa ketenagakerjaan yang timbul di era globalisasi. Permasalahan yang timbul adalah sejauh mana prospek dan kesiapan PHI dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ketenagakerjaan secara global di era MEA.Kata kunci: ketenagakerjaan; globalisasi; pengadilan; sengketa.ABSTRACTIndustrial relations that are a relationship of interest between workers and entrepreneurs, potentially cause disagreements, even disputes between the two parties. In connection with the device the settlement law of labor disputes is indispensable. Industrial relations disputes are disagreements that result in conflicts between entrepreneurs or joint entrepreneurs with workers/laborers or trade unions/unions due to disputes over rights, conflicts of interest, disputes of termination of employment and disputes between trade unions/unions in one company. The existence of the Industrial Relations Court which replaces the position of the Labour Dispute Resolution Committee is characterized by the change of the labor dispute resolution mechanism intended for the dispute resolution process to be implemented quickly, precisely, fairly and with cheap as the era of industrialization and science. The Industrial Relations Court (PHI) is a special court formed in an area of the District Court which is authorized to examine, prosecute and give judgment against Industrial relations disputes. Settlement of industrial relations disputes needs to be implemented quickly, because it relates to the production process and the creation of a harmonious industrial relations in a working relationship. In order to face the ASEAN Economic Community era (MEA), the Industrial relations Court has been prepared to settle employment disputes arising in the globalization era. The problem arises is the extent of the prospect and readiness of PHI in resolving employment disputes globally in the MEA era.Keywords: employment; globalization; court; dispute.
Upaya Hukum Banding Terhadap Putusan Verstek Yang Diajukan Oleh Pihak Tergugat Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Tinjauan HIR/RBG Sherly Ayuna Putri; Achmad Syauqi Nugraha
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v6i1.105

Abstract

The verdict of Verstek is the ruling that where the defendant, although called legitimately, does not come on a given day, and does not tell others to be facing his deputy, the claim is accepted with a decision without the presence (Verstek). Resistance is a legal effort against the verdict that was dropped outside the presence of the defendant. Essentially the resistance was provided for the defendant who (in general) was defeated. The Verzet is governed in article 125 paragraph (3) and 129 HIR, article 149 clause (3) Jo. 153 RBg. The research method which is conducted in this study is normative juridical research that emphasizes on the science of law and conduct an inventory of positive law relating to the effectiveness of statutory regulations in the fi eld of legal and descriptive analytical describing and analyzing the problems based on the legislation governing the law of civil proceedings regarding the legal efforts of Verstek decision. Based on the results of the study obtained fi rst problem of Verstek decision to be fi led by the defendant on the decision of the District Court of Bale Bandung Case Number: 37/PDT. G/2018/PN. BLB and the state court ruling of the Simalungun case number: 36/PDT. G/2013/PN. LICENSE does not conform to the norm in article 125 HIR and section 149 RBg. The two remedies that can be done by the plaintiff or the appeal is to apply for the appeal with the reasons set out in article 30 paragraph (1) of Law No. 5 of 2004 concerning the Supreme Court, among other things relating to the judge is not authorized or exceeds the limits of authority and or wrong in implementing or violating applicable laws.
Asas Nebis In Idem Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Dikaitkan Dengan Gugatan Perceraian Yang Diajukan Kembali Setelah Putusan Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Dihubungkan Dengan Kepastian Hukum Melin Simorangkir; Anita Afriana; Sherly Ayuna Putri
Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Volume 6, Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/jssh.v6i1.19392

Abstract

Pada Putusan Nomor 295/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Mdn dan Putusan Nomor 159/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bdg, yang mana pada kedua putusan tersebut Penggugat mengajukan gugatan untuk kedua kalinya. Namun, terdapat inkonsistensi hakim dalam memutuskan gugatan nebis in idem pada perkara perceraian yang pada akhirnya menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai pengaturan dan alasan perceraian dalam UU Perkawinan serta penerapan asas nebis in idem pada perkara gugatan cerai yang sudah berkekuatan hukum tetap dan diajukan kembali dihubungkan dengan kepastian hukum. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa pendekatan yuridis normatif, yang mana objek dari penelitian ini akan diteliti dan dianalisis dengan mengedepankan norma serta asas yang terdapat dalam hukum positif berupa data sekunder dan dilengkapi data primer. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu pada putusan yang menjadi objek penelitian telah memenuhi alasan perceraian yang sesuai dengan hukum positif dan terdapat inkonsistensi dalam penerapan asas nebis in idem pada putusan tersebut, yang mana Majelis Hakim pada Putusan Nomor 295/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Mdn tidak mengabulkan gugatan yang diajukan untuk kedua kalinya karena mengandung unsur nebis in idem berdasarkan Pasal 1917 KUHPerdata dan SEMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2002, sedangkan Majelis Hakim pada Putusan Nomor 159/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bdg mengabulkan gugatan yang diajukan untuk kedua kalinya yang berdasarkan Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 110/K/KG/1992 tanggal 23 Juli 1993 yang dijadikan pula sebagai rujukan dalam Rapat Kerja Nasional Mahkamah Agung RI Tahun 2007.
Co-Authors Achmad Syauqi Nugraha Agus Mulya Karsona Anita Afriana Etty Mulyati Kartikasari, Luciana Asih Melin Simorangkir