Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Surat Keterangan Waris Yang Memuat Keterangan Tidak Benar Dikaitkan Dengan Kekuatan Pembuktiannya Sebagai Akta Otentik Shaﬁra Meidina Rafaldini; Anita Afriana; Pupung Faisal
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

In Indonesia the distribution of inheritance, there are often disputes between parties who have an interest in each other. This makes some people choose to make a Inher itance Certiﬁcate which aims to prove the parties entitled to inheritance from the testator. In practice, heirs are often found that contain incorrect statements and serve as evidence in court proceedings, as found in Supreme Court Decision Number 121/Pid/2017/PT.DKI. This article discusses the power of proof of authentic deeds which contain incorrect statements in terms of the perspective of the Civil Procedure Code and the validity of an agreement based on authentic deeds which contain incorrect statements based on the Civil Code. Normative juridical research methods are used in this study, namely in-depth analysis of the positive regulations concerned and also ﬁeld research related to the process of making a Certiﬁcate of Inheritance in the Religious Courts, Notaries, and Village Ofﬁ ce. Based on the results showed the Inheritance Certiﬁcate containing incorrect information, still has the power of proof attached as long as no cancellation is submitted to the judge by the parties who feel disadvantaged, and as long as there is no decision from the court stating that the deed is invalid. However, if there has been a decision from a judge stating that a certain authentic deed is invalid, then the deed no longer has the perfect proof of strength as an authentic deed.

Penetapan Sita Eksekusi oleh Pengadilan Tanpa Didasari Diktum Putusan Akhir yang Mengabulkan Sita Jaminan (Analisis terhadap Perkara Nomor 332/ PDT.G/2016/PN.JKT.SEL) Anita Afriana; Abdoel Harun Lamo
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

A civil dispute issue was raised by litigants to the court in order to obtain a ruling. As for the verdict has power the law remains, the content was ﬁ nal judgement that can be executed. The ﬁ nal decisions that have permanent legal force should be able to be implemented voluntarily or if not, then it can be done by force (execution). In practice, there is a case where the execution decision by the chair of the court is absent and is not based on a court rulling stating that a valid and valuable consifcation guarantee. This article discusses process Letter of Determination of Conﬁ scation of Execution without being based on a judge's decision that granted conﬁ scation of collateral in case No. 332/Pdt.G/2016/ PN.Jkt.Sel and the legal consequences of the party executed by the Execution Seizure determined by the head of court in case No. 332/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel, when the decision has been legally binding it is still associated with the principle of legal certainty in the HIR. The research method used in this thesis is normative juridical which puts forward secondary data by completing primary data in the form of interviews with informants. With analytical analytics, secondary data and primary data are analyzed qualitatively. The results of this research indicate that the determination of the conﬁ scation of execution issued by the chairman of the Court in case No. 332/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel is valid, if it is related to Article 227 HIR that a decision has permanent legal force, the winning party may submit a seizure of execution conﬁ scation that was never previously stipulated in the decision and the legal consequences against Determination of execution, namely the Defendant's assets must be conﬁ scated in accordance with the determination of the execution for the beneﬁ t of the Plaintiff for the sake of legal certainty as the party won.

Surat Keterangan Waris Yang Memuat Keterangan Tidak Benar Dikaitkan Dengan Kekuatan Pembuktiannya Sebagai Akta Otentik Shaﬁra Meidina Rafaldini; Anita Afriana; Pupung Faisal
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v6i1.101

In Indonesia the distribution of inheritance, there are often disputes between parties who have an interest in each other. This makes some people choose to make a Inher itance Certiﬁcate which aims to prove the parties entitled to inheritance from the testator. In practice, heirs are often found that contain incorrect statements and serve as evidence in court proceedings, as found in Supreme Court Decision Number 121/Pid/2017/PT.DKI. This article discusses the power of proof of authentic deeds which contain incorrect statements in terms of the perspective of the Civil Procedure Code and the validity of an agreement based on authentic deeds which contain incorrect statements based on the Civil Code. Normative juridical research methods are used in this study, namely in-depth analysis of the positive regulations concerned and also ﬁeld research related to the process of making a Certiﬁcate of Inheritance in the Religious Courts, Notaries, and Village Ofﬁ ce. Based on the results showed the Inheritance Certiﬁcate containing incorrect information, still has the power of proof attached as long as no cancellation is submitted to the judge by the parties who feel disadvantaged, and as long as there is no decision from the court stating that the deed is invalid. However, if there has been a decision from a judge stating that a certain authentic deed is invalid, then the deed no longer has the perfect proof of strength as an authentic deed.

Penetapan Sita Eksekusi oleh Pengadilan Tanpa Didasari Diktum Putusan Akhir yang Mengabulkan Sita Jaminan (Analisis terhadap Perkara Nomor 332/ PDT.G/2016/PN.JKT.SEL) Anita Afriana; Abdoel Harun Lamo
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v6i1.98

A civil dispute issue was raised by litigants to the court in order to obtain a ruling. As for the verdict has power the law remains, the content was ﬁ nal judgement that can be executed. The ﬁ nal decisions that have permanent legal force should be able to be implemented voluntarily or if not, then it can be done by force (execution). In practice, there is a case where the execution decision by the chair of the court is absent and is not based on a court rulling stating that a valid and valuable consifcation guarantee. This article discusses process Letter of Determination of Conﬁ scation of Execution without being based on a judge's decision that granted conﬁ scation of collateral in case No. 332/Pdt.G/2016/ PN.Jkt.Sel and the legal consequences of the party executed by the Execution Seizure determined by the head of court in case No. 332/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel, when the decision has been legally binding it is still associated with the principle of legal certainty in the HIR. The research method used in this thesis is normative juridical which puts forward secondary data by completing primary data in the form of interviews with informants. With analytical analytics, secondary data and primary data are analyzed qualitatively. The results of this research indicate that the determination of the conﬁ scation of execution issued by the chairman of the Court in case No. 332/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel is valid, if it is related to Article 227 HIR that a decision has permanent legal force, the winning party may submit a seizure of execution conﬁ scation that was never previously stipulated in the decision and the legal consequences against Determination of execution, namely the Defendant's assets must be conﬁ scated in accordance with the determination of the execution for the beneﬁ t of the Plaintiff for the sake of legal certainty as the party won.

MEDIASI IN COURT UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN WIN –WIN SOLUTION Anita Afriana
JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA Vol 2, No 2 (2017): JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2
Publisher : Universitas Borneo Tarakan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35334/ay.v2i2.1548

ABSTRACT Basically, same with the civil settlement in the District Court, peace in thesettlement of bankruptcy cases is required to be implemented. The article of130 of HIR / 154 HIR concerning the obligation to reconcile the two sides havebeen concreted through Perma No 1, year 2016. However, this Perma can’t beapplied to the settlement of bankruptcy cases in the Commercial Court. This study want to know the juridical reasons the peace achieved through Mediation In Court based on Perma no. 1 of 2016 can’t be applied in the settlement of bankruptcy disputes in the Commercial Court and the juridical consequences that distinguish between the peace achieved through mediation in Court and the bankruptcy proceedings and PKPU related to certainty as the purpose of law Peace institutions through Perma No1, year 2016 pursued by means of mediation can not be applied to bankruptcy cases because bankruptcy is included in the volunteer domain whereas mediation in court is implemented in contentiosa case. Therefore, peace in the settlement of bankruptcy cases can’t be executed at the beginning of the investigation of bankruptcy cases in the Commercial Court, as new peace can be applied if the debtor's status is clear as a bankrupt party. Although mediation can’t be implemented in order to achieve peace in the bankruptcy case in the Commercial Court, the concept of a win-win solution remains in the implementation of peace in the Commercial Court is apeace that can provide balanced benefits for both parties as business actors.Keywords: bankruptcy, peace, win-win Solution

Perlindungan Hukum Investor Pasar Modal Akibat Kepailitan Perusahaan Terbuka Ditinjau Dari Hukum Kepailitan dan Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia Anita Afriana; Bagus Sujatmiko
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 2 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1133.508 KB)

Berinvestasi di pasar modal dalam bentuk saham merupakan salah satu pilihan investasi. Investasi saham menjadi alternatif pembiyaan bagi perusahaan di tanah air, khususnya perusahaan terbuka di pasar modal, namun berinvestasi di pasar modal dalam bentuk saham selain memberikan peluang keuntungan juga memiliki resiko antara lain kepailitan, khususnya bagi para investor yang berinvestasi pada perusahaan terbuka yang mengalami pailit. Oleh karena itu dalam tulisan ini akan dilihat perlindungan hukum bagi investor pasar modal pada kepailitan perusahaan terbuka dalam sudut pandang baik hukum kepailitan dan hukum perusahaan Indonesia. Legal Protection for Capital Market Investor Due The Bankruptcy of Listed Company Reviewed by Indonesia Bankruptcy and Company Law. AbstractInvesting in capital market with stock form is one of investment choice for most people which is give a financing solution for most of company in the country. Especially for a listed company in the capital market. But investing in the capital market with stock form not only give a profit opportunity but also have a risk such as bankruptcy, specialy bankruptcy at listed company. The purpose of this article is to seek and analyzelegal protection for capital market investor due the bankruptcy of listed company reviewed by Indonesia bankruptcy and company law.Keywords: Capital Market, Legal Protection, Investor, Bankruptcy, Listed CompanyDOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n2.a3

Problematika Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia dalam Rangka Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum Rai Mantili; Hazar Kusmayanti; Anita Afriana
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 1 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (588.282 KB)

Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha adalah suatu lembaga khusus yang dibentuk berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat untuk menegakkan hukum persaingan usaha. Tidak berkedudukan sebagai 'lembaga penegak hukum' yang sesungguhnya menyebabkan KPPU tidak memiliki daya paksa dalam hal pemanggilan para pihak maupun dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi. Selain itu, banyaknya putusan KPPU yang dibatalkan dalam proses upaya huku (yang disebut sebagai keberatan) yang diajukan pihak pelanggar pada akhirnya menyebabkan tidak terciptanya kepastian hukum bagi para pihak. Tulisan ini berupaya memperlihatkan gambaran pelaksanaan putusan persaingan usaha dalam praktik dalam tinjauan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat serta mengindentifikasi kendala-kendala dan upaya dalam penegakkan hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia agar tercipta kepastian hukumThe Problem of Law Enforcement in Business Competition in Establishing Legal CertaintyAbtractThe Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition (Komisi Persaingan Usaha) is a special institution established by Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Competition for enforcing competition law. Not functioning as a 'law enforcement agency' has led to KPPU to have no power to either forcibly summon the parties or execute its decisions. Moreover, a lot of KPPU's decisions are cancelled due to further legal action filed by the offender and thus undermining the legal centainty for the parties. The purpose of this article is to seek and analyze the enforcement of KPPU's decision in disputes regarding monopolistic practices and unfair competition as regulated in Law Number 5 of 1999. Furthermore, this article also aims to determine the obstacles in setting enforcement of competition law in order to not only establish legal certainty but also to achieve a healthy business climate in Indonesia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n1.a7

KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERKAIT PENGALIHAN PIUTANG (CESSIE) DALAM PRAKTIK KREDIT PEMILIKAN RUMAH DITINJAU DARI KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA Agung La Tenritata; Anita Afriana; Nun Harrieti
Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL POROS HUKUM PADJADJARAN
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jphp.v3i2.765

ABSTRAKProgram Kredit Pemilikian Rumah (KPR) biasanya diadakan oleh Bank. Namun seringkali pada praktek KPR sering terjadi permasalahan, salah satunya ialah terjadi kredit macet. Salah satu solusi yang sering digunakan oleh bank selaku kreditur yaitu dengan melakukan pengalihan piutang (cessie) pada objek KPR tersebut. Namun disisi lain dengan adanya pelaksanaan cessie tersebut menimbulkan permasalahan baru, yaitu nasabah selaku debitur seringkali merasa keberatan dengan adanya keputusan cessie. Seringkali debitur beranggapan dalam prosedur cessie yang dilakukan oleh kreditur tidak sesuai dengan aturan yang berlaku yaitu Pasal 613 KUHPerdata. Kepastian Hukum cessie yaitu dituangkan dalam Pasal 613 KUHPerdata, yang merupakan produk belanda sehingga terjemahannya menimbulkan multitafsir. Dengan adanya multitafsir dan berbeda-bedanya pandangan antara debitur dan kreditur menimbulkan sengketa-sengketa pada praktek cessie khususnya dalam pelaksanaan KPR. Permasalahan yang diangkat adalah kepastian hukum cessie tanpa persetujuan dan sepengetahuan debitur dihubungkan dengan KUHPerdata dan prosedur cessie kreditur terhadap pihak ketiga sebagai kreditur baru berdasarkan KUHPerdata. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, menggunakan spesifikasi deskriptif analistis, melalui studi kepustakaan dan studi lapangan, serta teknik pegumpulan data, dilanjutkan dengan analisis data. Tujuan penelitian adalah Untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kepastian hukum cessie tanpa persetujuan dan sepengetahuan debitur dihubungkan dengan KUHPerdata serta Untuk mengetahui dan mengkaji gambaran prosedur cessie kreditur terhadap pihak ketiga sebagai kreditur baru berdasarkan KUHPerdata. Kepastian Hukum cessie masih belum mengatur secara spesifik mengenai cessie khususnya terkait prosedur pelaksanaannya, sehingga hal tersebut menimbulkan permasalahan-permasalah baru seperti salah satunya seringkali terjadi multitafsir pada pelaksanaan cessie khususnya pada praktek KPR. Prosedur cessie Kreditur Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Sebagai Kreditur Baru masih berbeda-beda pada pelaksanaannya khususnya atas praktek KPR. Prosedur yang dilakukan oleh kreditur masih diserahkan kepada lembaga-lembaga yang melakukan cessie.Kata kunci: cessie; debitur; kreditur; KPR; kepastian hukum. ABSTRACTKPR programs are usually held by banks. But often in the practice of KPR problems often occur, one of which is bad credit. One solution that is often used by banks as creditors is to transfer receivables (cessie) on the KPR object. But on the other hand, the implementation of the cessie raises new problems, namely the customer as the debtor often objected to the cessie decision. Often the debtor assumes that the cessie procedure carried out by the creditor is not in accordance with the applicable rules, namely Article 613 of the Civil Code. The legal certainty of cessie is stated in Article 613 of the Civil Code, which is a Dutch product so that its translation gives rise to multiple interpretations. With multiple interpretations and different views between debtors and creditors, it creates disputes in cessie practice, especially in the implementation of KPR. The issue raised is the legal certainty of cessie without the consent and knowledge of the debtor associated with the Civil Code and the creditor's cessie procedure against third parties as new creditors based on the Civil Code. The method used is normative juridical, using analytical descriptive specifications, through library research and field studies, as well as data collection techniques, followed by data analysis. The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the legal certainty of cessie without the consent and knowledge of the debtor associated with the Civil Code and to find out and examine the description of the creditor's cessie procedure against third parties as new creditors based on the Civil Code. The legal certainty of the cessie still does not specifically regulate the cessie, especially regarding the implementation procedure, so that this creates new problems, one of which is that there are often multiple interpretations in the implementation of the cessie, especially in the practice of KPR. The procedure for cessie creditors against third parties as new creditors is still different in its implementation, especially on KPR practices. The procedures carried out by creditors are still left to the institutions conducting the cessie.Keywords: cessie; debtor; creditor; KPR; legal certainty

MENAKAR PENYELESAIAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA DI INDONESIA Anita Afriana; An An Chandrawulan
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 4 Nomor 1 September 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

ABSTRAK Pada asasnya semua jenis perkara perdata diselesaikan melalui mekanisme beracara yang sama sebagaimana yang telah diatur dalam peraturan yang berlaku. Bagi pihak yang bersengketa dengan nilai gugatan kecil, penyelesaian melalui pengadilan dengan prosedur yang biasa bukanlah pilihan yang tepat karena waktu dan biaya yang dihabiskan untuk beracara di pengadilan dianggap tidak sebanding dengan besarnya nilai yang dipersengketakan. Oleh karena itu melalui Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PerMa) No. 2 Tahun 2015 diatur tata cara menyelesaikan gugatan sederhana yang sesungguhnya mengadopsi mekanisme Small Claims Court (SCC) yang telah digunakan banyak negara, baik negara dengan sistem common law maupun civil law. Permasalahan yang akan dibahas adalah bagaimana SCC di negara Singapura dan Belanda serta penerapannya di Indonesia. Artikel ini merupakan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan dengan metode yuridis normatif, antara lain difokuskan pada perbandingan hukum selanjutnya dianalisis secara yuridis kualitatif. Penerapan penyelesaian sengketa dan penegakan hukum melalui SCC di Singapura dan Belanda memiliki perbedaan yang antara lain dipengaruhi oleh sistem hukum. Di Indonesia, SCC diintegrasikan dalam PerMA No. 2 Tahun 2015 yaitu prosedur penyelesaian gugatan sederhana yang cukup efektif menyelesaikan gugatan sederhana secara cepat, dengan prosedur yang berbeda dengan penyelesaian perkara sebagaimana diatur dalam HIR/RBg, namun dalam praktik terdapat kendala dalam hal eksekusi. Kata kunci: gugatan sederhana; small claims court; sengketa perdata, pengadilan. ABSTRACT Basically all kinds of civil cases are solved through the same mechanism as arranged in the rules. For the disputing party with the value of a small lawsuit, the settlement through court with the usual procedure is not the right choice because the time and cost spent on litigation are considered to be incompatible with the amount of disputed value, therefore enforced by Supreme Court Regulation (PerMa) Regulation No. 2 Year 2015 about the procedure of simple lawsuit settlement. Mechanisms used to resolve simple claims as regulated in PerMA No. 2 of 2015 actually adopts a mechanism in the Small Claims Court (SCC) that has been used previously in many countries, both in countries with common law and civil law systems. The issues to be discussed are how the SCC in Singapore and the Netherlands and their application in Indonesia. This article is a small part of the results of research conducted by normative juridical methods which are among others focused on comparative law, then analyzed by juridical qualitative. Application of settlement of disputes and law enforcement through the SCC in Singapore and the Netherlands has differences which, among others, are affected by the legal system. In Indonesia, SCC is integrated into PerMA No. 2 Year 2015, it is quite effective to settle a simple lawsuit quickly, with a different procedure with the settlement of the matter as regulated in HIR/RBg, bridges between court procedures and outside the courts but there are obstacles in terms of execution. Keywords: civil dispute; court; simple lawsuit; small claims court.

KEDUDUKAN ANGGOTA KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM SEBAGAI KREDITOR PADA KOPERASI SIMPAN KOPERASI PANDAWA MANDIRI GROUP YANG TELAH DINYATAKAN PAILIT ATAS DISITANYA BOEDEL PAILIT OLEH NEGARA Refhianti Chairanie; Anita Afriana
Jurnal Panji Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): PANJI KEADILAN Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36085/jpk.v4i1.1277

ABSTRAKKepailitan merupakan sita umum yang dilakukan atas seluruh kekayaan Debitor Pailit yang pengurusan dan pemberesannya dilakukan oleh Kurator dibawah pengawasan Hakim Pengawas sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Permasalahan dalam Kepailitan dapat bersinggungan dengan Kasus Pidana, dimana kegiatan sita-menyita yang dilakukan dialam Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana memiliki perbedaan. Penyitaan dalam Pidana merupakan kegiatan yang dilakukan guna kepentingan dalam pembuktian di dalam Persidangan. Spesifikasi yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini adalah deskriptif analitis dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. teknik pengumpulan data berupa studi dokumen dan wawancara. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah, Pertama, Anggota KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group dapat disebut juga sebagai Kreditor yang kemudian disebut juga sebagai Kreditor Penyimpan atas kegiatan simpan-pinjam yang dilakukan didalam KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group. Kreditor Penyimpan masuk kedalam tingkatan Kreditor Konkuren, dimana setiap Anggota yang termasuk kedalam Kreditor Penyimpan tidak memiliki jaminan dan/atau hak istimewa didalam pengembalian terhadap Piutang yang dimilikinya. Kedua, Permasalahan didalam KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group yang bersinggungan dengan permasalahan dalam Hukum Pidana dapat diselesaikan melalui peraturan yang termaktub didalam KUHAP. Pembagian terhadap harta Pailit yang telah dilakukan sita dalam Hukum Pidana hanya dapat dimintakan kembali selama tidak terbukti merupakan hasil dari tindak Pidana.Kata kunci: kepailitan; koperasi; kreditorABSTRACTBankruptcy is a general confiscation of all assets of the Bankrupt Debtor, which is then handled and resolved by the Curator under the Supervisory Judge as regulated in Law Number 37 Year 2004 Problems in Bankruptcy can intersect with Criminal Cases, where confiscation activities carried out in Civil Law and Criminal Law are different. Confiscation in Criminal Law is an activity carried out for the benefit of proof in court. The specification is descriptive analytical using the normative juridical approach. The research stages used are literature study and field study with data collection techniques in the form of document study and interviews. The results, First, members of the KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group can also be referred to as Creditor which is then also referred to as Depository Creditors for the savings and loan activities carried out within the KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group. Depositing Creditors are included in the level of Concurrent Creditors, where each Member who is included in the Depository Creditors does not have guarantees and / or privileges in returning their Receivables. Second, problems within the KSP Pandawa Mandiri Group that intersect with problems in Criminal Law can be resolved through the regulations contained in the Criminal Code. The distribution of Bankruptcy assets which have been confiscated under the Criminal Law can only be requested back as long as it is not proven to be the result of a criminal act.Keynotes: bankrupty; cooperative; creditor

Title

Found 15 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 15 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 15 Documents
Search