Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.503
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Hasanuddin Law Review JHCLS Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Contrarius
Lego Karjoko
Faculty of Law, Universitas sebelas Maret, Surakarta
Religion Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Islamic Court’s Approach to Land Dispute in Inheritance Cases Lego Karjoko; Abdul Kadir Jaelani; Hilaire Tegnan; Henning Glaser; Muhammad Jihadul Hayat
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 21, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v21i2.21864

Abstract

This study examines the legal considerations in settling inheritance disputes involving land distribution in Selong Religious (Islamic) Court of West Nusa Tenggara. The data in this study were obtained from interviews and court decision analysis. This study shows that the practice of granting property before the death of the muwārith (testator) can cause inheritance-based land disputes in the future. Disputes usually arose when the land was distributed only to particular heirs, neglecting the others, especially the daughters and their descendants. In deciding the land disputes in inheritance cases, judges evermore considered the legal validity of the land distribution. Besides that, the judges use Islamic legal sources such as the Quran, Hadith, opinions of scholars, and fiqh in their legal considerations. However, the use of these multiple references does not necessarily lead to a diverse outcomes.  Abstrak: Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam memutus perkara sengketa hibah tanah di Pengadilan Agama Selong, Nusa Tenggara Barat. Data pada penelitian ini diperoleh dari wawancara dan analisis putusan. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kebiasaan masyarakat menghibahkan harta sebelum kematian pewaris cenderung menjadi pemicu sengketa tanah berbasis waris di kemudian hari. Sengketa biasanya muncul dari pembagian tanah yang hanya kepada sebagian ahli waris dan merugikan sebagian ahli waris yang lain, terutama bagi anak perempuan dan keturunannya. Dalam memutus sengketa hibah tanah dalam kewarisan, hakim selalu mempertimbangkan keabsahan hukum hibah tanah dalam kasus yang diajukan. Selain itu, hakim juga menggunakan ayat-ayat al-Qur’an, hadis, pendapat ulama, dan kaidah fikih sebagai pertimbangan hukumnya.
The Principle of Social Justice As a Solution in Illegal Mining Activities in The Old Wells Oil Management Lego Karjoko; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Abdul Kadir Jaelani; Willy Naresta Hanum
Justitia Jurnal Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Justitia Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v6i02.9390

Abstract

The old wells oil management is petroleum management which accentuates the empowerment of local communities in the producing region. The goal of this oil management is to provide maximum prosperity for the people as mandated by Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. This paper aims to formulate the model of old wells oil management based on the social justice principle. This paper has a normative legal study method that uses a term of old wells management in Wonocolo oil fields, Bojonegoro regency. The result is because old wells oil management in Wonocolo oil field does not fully reflect the social justice principle, then it causes illegal mining activities. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate a model of old wells management based on the principle of social justice with two indicators i.e. 1) The equal distribution of benefits and 2) Participation.Keywords: Oil, Old Wells, Illegal Mining, Benefit Distribution, Participation, Social Justice
The Policy on Illegal Oil Palm Plantation Reform in Forest Area during Jokowi’s Presidency Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto; Lego Karjoko; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Arifin Ma’aruf; Henning Glaser
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v8i2.3566

Abstract

Indonesia is the largest oil palm producer. The area of oil palm plantations is approximately 3.4 million. However, this large potential is not part away from legal issues such as illegal oil palm plantations. It is also implied by overlapping regulations and permits. This study aims to examine the policy of illegal oil palm plantations reform and the rooted regulation problem in forest areas during Joko Widodo era. This research relies on a normative legal approach. Data was collected through the investigation of legal material regarding oil palm policies. The results of this study indicate that the overlapping regulation contributes negatively to the reformation attempt. Yet, there are no legal products and policies regarding the dispute settlement of illegal oil palm in forest areas. Repressive implementation of criminal law does not solve the problem at the grassroots. The establishment of Job Creation Law provides new hope for the settlement of oil palm plantations problem by mainstreaming the nonlitigation mechanism, namely administrative sanctions.
The Conceptualization of Environmental Administration Law in Environmental Pollution Control Fatma Ulfatun Najicha; Lego Karjoko; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Rachmi Handayani; Rosita Chandrakirana; Dian Furqani Tenrilawa
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol 2, No 2 (2022): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (464.552 KB) | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v2i2.44

Abstract

Environment is an essential element of life. The domain offers a variety of advantages and functions for humans to carry out activities and reside there. This is normative legal research using secondary sources. According to the study's findings, environmental law enforcement can be conducted both punitively and preventatively, depending on its effectiveness and nature. The lack of coordination between sectors (government officials), the absence of a monitoring plan, and the lack of environmental supervisors are obstacles to ecological monitoring.
How to Resolve Land Ownership Conflicts Involving Government Assets in Indonesia Ravi Danendra; Lego Karjoko; Hilaire Tegnan
Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues
Publisher : Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jsderi.v4i2.299

Abstract

This research examines the role of political leadership in shaping land tenure policy and community resistance in Bong Mojo, Surakarta, where a conflict emerged between the Surakarta City Government as the legal holder of land rights and local residents who claimed long term occupation. The research aims to analyze the influence of political leadership on land conflict resolution and to explain how local cultural values reshape the interpretation of land rights. This study applies a sociolegal approach by combining decolonial legal theory, critical legal studies, and critical discourse analysis. The research uses statutory materials, policy documents, field observations, and in-depth interviews with government officials and community representatives to examine the interaction between formal legal institutions and community-based land practices.  The findings reveal three principal approaches to resolving land ownership conflicts involving government assets in Indonesia. First, effective conflict resolution requires balancing legal certainty with substantive justice by recognizing the state's authority over public assets while considering the historical occupation, social dependence, and legitimate interests of local communities. Second, participatory governance through dialogue, negotiation, and collaboration among government institutions, affected communities, and other stakeholders provides a more sustainable mechanism for resolving disputes than relying exclusively on formal legal enforcement. Third, integrating statutory land law with local wisdom and the social function of land creates an equitable land governance model that strengthens public trust, protects government assets, promotes social justice, and prevents recurring land conflicts. These findings demonstrate that sustainable land conflict resolution depends on combining legal, institutional, and socio-cultural approaches within a comprehensive governance framework.
Unprotected Land Ownership Rights in Corporate Land Acquisition Lego Karjoko; Nabila Rahma Safitri; Ravi Danendra
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i1.261

Abstract

Land ownership conflicts in Indonesia frequently emerge in plantation regions when local communities cultivate land in fact while corporations assert formal legal control over the same land. This situation generates agrarian disputes that expose structural tensions between the formal land certification regime and long-established patterns of community land use. This study examines the philosophical orientation underlying judicial reasoning in adjudicating disputes concerning Land Use Rights held by PT Perkebunan Nusantara Persero and evaluates the degree of legal protection granted to communities that cultivate land without formal certificates. The research applies a normative legal method through statutory and case approaches. The study relies on primary and secondary legal materials gathered through systematic literature review and analyzes them using deductive reasoning and interpretative analysis. The findings demonstrate that judicial panels in five cases placed primary emphasis on formal legal certainty by prioritizing documentary evidence of title and by disregarding factual realities related to community cultivation. This approach directs adjudication toward procedural compliance and limits consideration of substantive justice and social utility. The analysis further shows that the legal system has not provided adequate protection for affected communities. Effective preventive protection requires clearer regulatory arrangements governing land control by communities and state-owned enterprises. Effective repressive protection requires judges to assess both formal documentation and material evidence in a balanced manner. The study concludes that current judicial practice has not achieved equitable legal protection for communities engaged in cultivated land use.
Co-Authors Abdul Kadir Jaelani Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto Anis H Bajrektarevic Arifin Ma’aruf Dian Furqani Tenrilawa Fatma Ulfatun Najicha Hayat, Muhammad Jihadul Henning Glaser Henning Glaser Hilaire Tegnan Hilaire Tegnan I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani Jaco Barkhuizen Jaelani, Abdul Kadir Jalu Ario Setyo Utomo Jelang Fajar Putra Perdana Muhammad Reza Fadhil Pratama Nabila Rahma Safitri Ravi Danendra Rosita Chandrakirana Sapto Hermawan Willy Naresta Hanum Yudistira Yudistira