Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Perempuan Muda dan Partai Politik : Dari Descriptive Participation menuju Substantive Representation Ani Widyani Soetjipto
Jurnal Perempuan Vol. 28 No. 2 (2023): Partisipasi Politik Perempuan dan Kelompok Muda dalam Demokrasi Indonesia
Publisher : Yayasan Jurnal Perempuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34309/jp.v28i2.844

Abstract

The low level of political participation among women in general, including young women, in Indonesia can be explained through three reasons. Firstly, women face a challenging playing field because politics is predominantly characterized by a masculine culture. Secondly, in their pursuit of political engagement, women encounter several obstacles, such as patriarchal structures, sexist and ageist views, and social class barriers. Thirdly, young women are also hindered by political nepotism, lack of party support, limited political knowledge, and financial constraints. This paper utilizes the conceptual framework of Women and Political Party by Lovenduski (1997), Squires (2007), Ann Phillips’ theory of women’s representation, as well as the works of Young, Mouffe, Childs, and Krook to examine the dynamics of young women and political parties in Indonesia from the 2019 elections to the upcoming 2024 elections. The focus is on the interconnection between descriptive participation and substantive representation. The research methodology employed involves a critical analysis of existing literature supplemented by interviews conducted with young women actively involved in five political parties qualified as participants in the 2024 elections (Golkar, NasDem, PKB, Demokrat, and PSI), including both ordinary party members and those who were elected as members of the DPR (People’s Representative Council of Indonesia) in the 2019 elections.
Jane Ahlstrand (2022), "Women, media, and power in Indonesia" Soetjipto, Ani Widyani; Masinambow, Arnold A.E.
Wacana, Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia Vol. 25, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

DIFUSI NORMA GLOBAL KESETARAAN GENDER DI KOREA SELATAN TAHUN 2015-2023 Putri, Octaviyanti; Soetjipto, Ani Widyani
Indonesian Journal of International Relations Vol 9 No 2 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Publisher : Indonesian Association for International Relations

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32787/ijir.v9i2.683

Abstract

This research discusses the diffusion of global gender equality norms in South Korea through the analysis of the Norm Diffusion theory by Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. The main focus is on how the gender equality norms initiated by the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) are implemented in South Korea. Despite ratifying CEDAW in 1984, South Korea still faces significant challenges in achieving gender equality, largely due to strong patriarchal and Confucian values. This study identifies that the diffusion of gender equality norms is hindered by local political opportunity structures and weak grassroots movement support. Additionally, low publicity and awareness of CEDAW among the public and cultural barriers slow down the process of norm cascade and internalization of gender equality norms. The study concludes that to improve the acceptance and implementation of gender equality norms in South Korea, there needs to be significant changes in societal attitudes and more proactive government policies
Transitional Justice in Indonesia: The Persistent Challenge of Addressing the 1965-1966 Mass Killings Mkumbi, Dyamwale Amir; Soetjipto, Ani Widyani
Global Strategis Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025): Global Strategis
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jgs.19.2.2025.287-308

Abstract

This article explores why Indonesia has struggled to achieve meaningful transitional justice for the 1965-1966 mass killings despite ongoing democratic reforms and advocacy efforts. These events, which led to the deaths of an estimated 500,000 to one million alleged communists, remain unaddressed due to entrenched political and military power, societal resistance, and ineffective judicial mechanisms. Using a qualitative approach, this research examines survivor testimonies, official reports from institutions such as Komnas HAM, and scholarly literature to understand the underlying challenges. The findings suggest that Indonesia's inability to confront these past atrocities stems from a lack of political will, continued military influence, and a deeply ingrained culture of silence reinforced by decades of state propaganda. While international advocacy efforts, including the International People's Tribunal (IPT) and grassroots movements, have shed light on the issue, systemic obstacles impede progress. This study highlights the potential benefits of hybrid courts, an independent truth commission, and comprehensive reparations programs by comparing Indonesia's situation with transitional justice efforts in South Africa and Cambodia. These reforms are crucial for addressing historical injustices, fostering national reconciliation, and promoting long-term accountability. Keywords: Transitional justice, 1965-1966 killings, Indonesia, Human rights, Impunity   Artikel ini membahas mengapa Indonesia kesulitan untuk mencapai keadilan transisional yang bermakna untuk pembunuhan massal tahun 1965-1966, meskipun telah melakukan reformasi demokrasi dan upaya advokasi yang berkelanjutan. Peristiwa yang mengakibatkan kematian sekitar 500.000 hingga satu juta orang yang dituduh komunis ini, masih belum terselesaikan karena kuatnya kekuasaan politik dan militer, resistensi masyarakat, dan mekanisme peradilan yang tidak efektif. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif, penelitian ini menganalisis kesaksian korban, laporan para penyintas, laporan resmi dari institusi Komnas HAM, dan literatur akademis untuk memahami tantangan mendasar yang ada. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketidakmampuan Indonesia dalam menghadapi kekejaman masa lalu ini disebabkan oleh kurangnya kemauan politik, pengaruh militer yang masih kuat, serta budaya “diam” yang mengakar akibat propaganda negara selama puluhan tahun. Meskipun upaya advokasi internasional, seperti International People's Tribunal (IPT), dan gerakan akar rumput telah menyoroti masalah ini, hambatan sistemis menghalangi kemajuan. Studi ini menekankan potensi manfaat dari pengadilan hibrida, komisi kebenaran yang independen, dan program reparasi komprehensif dengan membandingkan situasi Indonesia dengan upaya keadilan transisional di Afrika Selatan dan Kamboja. Reformasi ini penting untuk mengatasi ketidakadilan sejarah, memupuk rekonsiliasi nasional, dan mendorong akuntabilitas jangka panjang. Kata-Kata Kunci: Keadilan transisional, Pembunuhan 1965-1966, Indonesia, Hak asasi manusia, Impunitas