<![CDATA[Abstract Monitoring and review of legislation is an integral part of the legislative cycle, aiming to ensurethe effectiveness, consistency, and responsiveness of regulations to societal dynamics. Thestrengthening of this function has been normatively emphasized in the amendment to LawNumber 12 of 2011 through Law Number 13 of 2022 concerning the Formation of Legislation, which requires legislative and executive institutions to conduct evaluations of laws. However, in practice, the mechanism for monitoring and reviewing legislation in Indonesia still faces various problems, particularly in the context of implementing the 2019–2024 National Legislation Program (Prolegnas). This study aims to analyze the normative design of the mechanism for monitoring and reviewing legislation, identify gaps between norms and empirical practice, and formulate a more effective reconstruction model for the mechanism. This study uses normative legal methods with a legislative and conceptual approach, and is analyzed qualitatively. The results show that although the normative framework has accommodated the function of legislative evaluation, its implementation remains administrative in nature, not integrated into the legislative cycle, and not evidence-based. Furthermore, monitoring of laws resulting from the 2019–2024 National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) has not been conducted systematically, which has resulted in repeated regulatory changes without comprehensive evaluation. Therefore, a reconstruction of the legislative monitoring and review mechanism is needed through an integrated, participatory, and data-driven post legislative scrutiny approach to strengthen the quality of the national legislative system.]]>
