Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PROSIDING Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Nagari Law Review JOURNAL EQUITABLE Jurnal Yudisial Jurnal Abdimas Madani dan Lestari (JAMALI) International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) AS-SIYASI JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research Unisia
Suparman Marzuki, Suparman
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Gerakan Menuju Masyarakat Sipil: Membaca Gerakan Bantuan Hukum LBH Suparman Marzuki
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 8 No. 17: Juni 2001
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Movement oflaw assistance is very possible tobeprohegemony ofstatesociatal move ment onadvocation setting ofhandelling cases in which thesociety faced bystate. Itis often that The Legal Aid Institute face a diliema in handelling the cases. On other side, there isinclination to raise a negotiation orlobbiying to statewith the risk ofreducing thesubtantive problem towards formal law problem andeven isolation ofsociety from sub stantive problem itself. On the otherside, thewayofadvocation is unvoidable from the formal law traps with the various kinds ofprocedures ofspecial mechanism. Although the movement of TheLegalAids Institute has not been an altemative socialmovement for cn'tical consciousness action for society through building contra-hegemonic, but is done historically, The Legal Aids Institute movement is still as organized movement in building the societal change.
Politik Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Tentang Kebebasan Beragama Pasca Orde Baru Suparman Marzuki
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 2: MEI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art1

Abstract

This research aims to uncoven and describe: first, the policy of state regulation in order to fulfil the right to religious freedom. Second, the concrete actions of state in taking legal steps against violations of religious freedom. This research utilizes a normative juridical method where data is collected from documents. The outcome of this research concludes that: first, Political Human Rights on the freedom of religion in Indonesia following the new order at the level of fulfilment in the form of legislation is relatively more advance and protective. Second, the strengthening of Political Human Rights at the regulatory level is not followed by changes in the legislation below it such as PNPS Law No.1 of 1965 and Article 156(a) of the Indonesian Criminal Code regarding blasphemy. Therefore, it can be concluded that Political Human Rights in Indonesia, particularly relating to the freedom of religion is a paradox. On one side it supports the products of laws and regulation which further strengthen the rights to the freedom of religion and beliefs, but on the other hand, realistically, the State actually fails to protect various forms of violations of the right to the freedom of religion and beliefs. This research aims to uncoven and describe: first, the policy of state regulation in order to fulfil the right to religious freedom. Second, the concrete actions of state in taking legal steps against violations of religious freedom. This research utilizes a normative juridical method where data is collected from documents. The outcome of this research concludes that: first, Political Human Rights on the freedom of religion in Indonesia following the new order at the level of fulfilment in the form of legislation is relatively more advance and protective. Second, the strengthening of Political Human Rights at the regulatory level is not followed by changes in the legislation below it such as PNPS Law No.1 of 1965 and Article 156(a) of the Indonesian Criminal Code regarding blasphemy. Therefore, it can be concluded that Political Human Rights in Indonesia, particularly relating to the freedom of religion is a paradox. On one side it supports the products of laws and regulation which further strengthen the rights to the freedom of religion and beliefs, but on the other hand, realistically, the State actually fails to protect various forms of violations of the right to the freedom of religion and beliefs.
Edukasi Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penyandang Disabilitas di Kecamatan Sewon Kabupaten Bantul Suparman Marzuki; despan heryansyah
Jurnal Abdimas Madani dan Lestari (JAMALI) Volume 01, Issue 01, Maret 2019
Publisher : UII

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jamali.vol1.iss1.art5

Abstract

The poor public servants of persons with disabilities are caused by many things, ranging from the educational background of village government officials, to the culture that has lived and developed in the community that people with disabilities cannot be equated with other normal people. However, efforts to create public services that are equal and friendly to persons with disabilities must continue, this is not only in order to protect the human rights of every citizen but also in carrying out the mandate of the constitution. Facing this condition, the Indonesian Government then issued Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities. This law is the basis and reference for the government in providing services to persons with disabilities with a basic concept of respect for human dignity. The basis of service for persons with disabilities is at least related to two things, the main focus of which is on removing barriers. First, the availability of facilities and facilities available to reach persons with disabilities. Second, the paradigm of the government or government apparatus for persons with disabilities in providing public services. Sewon Subdistrict was used as an object of service because it considered quite a lot of disability operators. Indeed, until now, there is no definite number of persons with disabilities in Sewon sub-district, because the government itself does not conduct the database. Admittedly, this is one of the weaknesses that have occurred so far, let alone responsiveness and response to a number of problems they face, even the data collection on the number of the local government does not have it
PERSPEKTIF MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA Suparman Marzuki
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 6, No 3 (2013): PERTARUNGAN ANTARA KUASA DAN TAFSIR
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v6i3.98

Abstract

ABSTRAKPerspektif Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Hak Asasi Manusia yang dapat dibaca melalui tiga putusannya, yaitu: Putusan Nomor 065/PUU-II/2004; Putusan Nomor 102/PUU-VII/2009 dan Putusan Nomor 140/PUU-VII/2009 menunjukkan bahwa Mahkamah Konstitusi tidak secara konsisten menggunakan satu perspektif dalam mempertimbangkan dan memutus kedudukan suatu undang-undang. Pada satu putusan menggunakan perspektif universal, tetapi pada putusan lain menggunakan perspektif partikular. Perspektif universal menyatakan HAM berlaku universal untuk semua orang di manapun dan bahwa hak asasi manusia adalah hak yang dimiliki manusia karena ia adalah manusia. Setiap manusia memiliki hak asasi yang tidak boleh diingkari dan dicabut kecuali dengan keputusan hukum yang adil. Sebaliknya perspektif partikular menyatakan HAM tidaklah universal, tetapi kontekstual bahwa tiap-tiap bangsa memiliki keunikan sendiri-sendiri yang mengakibatkan nilai universal sebagai suatu kebohongan, yang ada hanyalah bersifat kewilayahan dan ketaksengajaan (contingent). Dalam putusan-putusan tersebut ketidakkonsistenan ini terjadi lebih karena dipengaruhi oleh sensitivitas sosial politik dari materi undang-undang yang diuji dan bukan karena objek dari hak yang diuji.Kata kunci: hak asasi manusia, perspektif universal, perspektif partikular.ABSTRACTThe perspectives of the Constitutional Court about human rights are shown in its decisions, among others: Decision Number 065/PUU-II/2004, Decision Number 102/PUU-VII/2009, and Decision Number 140/PUU-VII/2009. In the three decisions, the Constitutional Court seems inconsistently using one perspective in considering a decision and ruling the law. In one decision the Constitutional Court viewed with universal perspective, while on the other ruling employed the particular perspective. The universal perspective perceives that human rights are universal to anyone and anywhere, and those human rights are the basics for every human being. Human rights are undeniable and deprivable, unless by a just court decision. Contrariwise, the particular perspective asserts that human rights are not universal, but contextual that each nation has its own uniqueness that sees universal value as a distorted truth, rather territorial and contingent. In these decisions, inconsistencies occur as the influence of socio-political sensitivity of the legal material reviewed, not because of the object of the rights reviewed.Keywords: human right, universal perspective, particular perspective.
Masalah Kejahatan di Perkotaan Suparman Marzuki
Unisia No. 9: Tahun XI Triwulan III 1991
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/unisia.v0i9.5156

Abstract

-
Hukum Bukanlah Idealisasi Moral Masyarakat Suparman Marzuki
Unisia No. 47: Tahun XXVI Triwulan I 2003
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/unisia.vol26.iss47.art6

Abstract

The incompatibility of Indonesian legal system with the effort for creation of Justice and economic welfare, closely links to the conceptual ground and integralistic state framework which strongly leads to give more power for the state, and not for the society. The solution needed is to push the law to further move from repressive law system toward autonomous law or responsive law.
Menumbuhkan Budaya Malu dalam Memerangi Korupsi Suparman Marzuki
Unisia No. 22: Tahun XIV Triwulan II 1994
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/unisia.v0i22.5392

Abstract

-
Kekerasan dan Ketakutan pada Kekerasan Suparman Marzuki
Unisia No. 61: Tahun XXIX Triwulan III 2006
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/unisia.vol29.iss61.art7

Abstract

The social violence phenomenon can not be explained and related to the structural domains only, but it is also involved and influenced by social, political, law and that of politician and leaders behavior. In Western societies is not so urgent to relate the politician and the leaders behavior, but for Indonesian nation that of behavior is involved because social relation between leaders and their community sometimes supported and directed by social trust, instead that of spiritual. This relation has psychological dimension which can be stabilization and anarchy factors. In this respect, the role of law, law enforcement, the institution of law should be first priority to control, minimize violence, and fear of violence.
Hukum Sebagai Kerangka Landasan Pembangunan Suparman Marzuki
Unisia No. 13: Tahun XIII Triwulan 2 1992
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/unisia.v0i13.5517

Abstract

-
Mengungkap Kebenaran Pelanggaran HAM Masa Lalu di Era Transisi Demokrasi Suparman Marzuki
Unisia No 55/XXVIII/I/2005
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/unisia.vol28.iss55.art5

Abstract

The problem of state responsibility toward gross violation of human rights that con ducted by past regime denotes and becomes a crucial and complex problem Including the gross violation of human rights that happening in Indonesia. In term of this, for instances the cases of Tanjung Priok, Komando Jihad, Aceh, Talang Sari Lampung and so on. Because of the fall of New Order Regime, pro democracy powers as like South Africa, East Europe, The Latin America and Asia countries force to settle tha cases of human rights as prerequisite of democracy consolidation. According to author of the article that the responsibility of gross violation of human rights by past regime denotes an agenda for each transitional government because there are rights to know the truth, rights of justice, and rights to human dignity. The task of the regime is preparing the mechanism how to responsible for old regime.
Co-Authors Despan Heryansyah Despan Heryansyah Despan Heryansyah, Despan Hadi, Sahid M. Syafi’ie Sahid Hadi