Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.556
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu dan Industri Peternakan JURNAL GALUNG TROPIKA Sinergitas Multidisiplin Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi (SMIPT) Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat REKASATWA : Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Jurnal Dedikasi Journal AK-99 Economos : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Jurnal Gallus Gallus
Fitriani Fitriani
Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
ANALISIS KESESUAIAN PENERAPAN BIOSECURITY PADA PETERNAKAN AYAM BROILER SISTEM CLOSED HOUSE DAN OPEN HOUSE BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN (Studi Kasus Desa Abbumpungeng Kecamatan Cina Kabupaten Bone) Fitriani Fitriani; Irmayani Irmayani; Nur Hapsa; Nurul Amin
Journal Gallus Gallus Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Gallus Gallus (2026)
Publisher : Jurusan Peternakan, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Pangkajene Kepulauan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51978/gallusgallus.v4i1.727

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the level of compliance in the implementation of biosecurity based on legislative regulations in broiler chicken farms using closed house and open house systems in Abbumbungeng Village, Cina District, Bone Regency. The research was conducted through observation, interviews, and documentation. The variables observed included closed house housing, open house housing, external biosecurity, and internal biosecurity.The results showed that the implementation of external biosecurity in the closed house system was categorized as very good, with a percentage of 89.0%, and internal biosecurity also reached 89.0%. Meanwhile, in the open house system, the implementation of external biosecurity was 40.1% and internal biosecurity was 60.0%. Based on the overall results, the implementation of biosecurity in the closed house system is better than in the open house system. However, both systems still require improvements in the implementation of biosecurity, both external and internal. Keywords: Closed House, Open House, Internal Biosecurity, External Biosecurity
Co-Authors Akbar Akbar Aldiansyah Aldiansyah Alpian Mardin Ananda Anugrah Ramadhan Andi Wafiah Andi Yusrianti Khadijah Arifin Arifin Asty Nurzamzani Samad Ayu Dwi Putri Rusman Emilia Irviani Giul Erviana Erviana I.D. Novieta Ikhwanul Mu’min Indarti R Intan Dwi Novieta Intan Dwi Novieta, Intan Dwi Irmayani Irmayani Juliawati Rauf Juliawati Rauf Jurhana Jurhana M. Ajir M. Ajir Muh Rijal Muh. Syahril R Muhammad Akbar Muhammad Hatta Nur Hapsa Nur Wildayanti B Nurainun Nurainun Nurhaedah Nurhaedah Nurhapsa Nurmili Nurmili Nurul Amin Rahmawati Semaun Rani Laela Anggraeni Rasbawati, Rasbawati Rio Andioko Suhardin Suhardin Syahrani Nurul Aprilia Wisti Mutiara Yasri Tarawiru