Eka Julianti
Universitas Terbuka

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : global science journal of information technology and computer science

Bridging the Language of Cybersecurity: A Semantic Comparison Between NIST and ISO/IEC 27000 Terminologies Eka Julianti; Dewi Andriyanti; Aji Nurrohman; Rudolf Sinaga
Global Science: Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): June: Global Science: Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/globalscience.v2i2.203

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Inconsistent terminology across cybersecurity frameworks undermines global governance and interoperability. The National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF 2.0) and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 share similar objectives but diverge semantically in defining risk, control, and resilience. This semantic gap causes difficulties in compliance mapping and automated policy translation. Research Objectives: This study aims to analyze the semantic similarity and divergence between NIST and ISO/IEC 27000 terminologies, identify conceptual structures influencing interoperability, and propose an AI-assisted foundation for harmonizing cybersecurity language globally. Methodology: A mixed-method semantic comparative design integrates Natural Language Processing (NLP) and ontology mapping. Using the nist_glossary.csv dataset and ISO vocabularies, terms were normalized and analyzed via cosine similarity using sentence-transformer embeddings. Ontological alignment was visualized through the Semantic Threat Graph (STG) and validated by certified experts using Cohen’s Kappa reliability tests. Results: From 672 term pairs, results show 40.9% high semantic equivalence, 38.8% partial overlap, and 20.3% semantic divergence. Strongest alignment appears in “Protect” and “Identify” domains, while divergences occur in governance and recovery-related terms. Ontology mapping revealed three conceptual clusters—Risk Governance, Technical Safeguards, and Organizational Readiness. Conclusions: Findings confirm a 79.7% total semantic alignment, indicating strong potential for harmonizing global cybersecurity standards. The study contributes an empirical model combining computational linguistics and AI-based ontology mapping to establish semantic interoperability, enabling unified cybersecurity governance and AI-driven compliance automation. Keywords: Semantic Interoperability; Ontology Mapping; Cybersecurity Frameworks; NIST; ISO/IEC 27000 Terminology
Data-Driven Analysis of Healthcare Service Efficiency Using Temporal and Process Mining Approaches Eka Julianti; Renny Afriany; Samsinar
Global Science: Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): September: Global Science: Journal of Information Technology and Computer Scien
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/globalscience.v2i3.227

Abstract

Background: Healthcare service efficiency has become a critical concern due to increasing patient demand and limited resources, where prolonged waiting time is a key indicator of inefficiency and reduced service quality. However, existing studies predominantly focus on prediction or aggregate analysis without integrating temporal characteristics and process-oriented perspectives to explicitly identify bottlenecks and patient heterogeneity. Objective:This study aims to evaluate healthcare service efficiency through a data-driven framework that integrates temporal analysis, bottleneck identification, and clustering techniques. Methods: The study utilizes 3,335 patient records and analyzes waiting time and service time using descriptive statistics, distribution analysis, rule-based bottleneck classification, and K-Means clustering with data normalization. Results: The results show a significant imbalance between waiting time (mean = 40.03 minutes; max = 1428; Standard Deviation (SD) = 103.01) and service time (mean = 4.45 minutes; max = 59; SD = 7.88), indicating high variability and extreme delays. Bottleneck analysis reveals that 79.7% of cases are dominated by waiting time, while only 20.3% are related to service processes. Clustering identifies three distinct patterns: efficient service (19.34 min waiting), queue bottleneck (505.25 min waiting), and complex service (29.70 min service time). Conclusions & Implications: This study contributes by providing an integrated analytical framework that uncovers both structural inefficiencies and heterogeneous patient patterns. In conclusion, inefficiency is predominantly driven by queue-related delays, highlighting the importance of optimizing patient flow management rather than solely improving clinical capacity.