Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Comparative analysis of decision tree and random forest classifiers for structured data classification in machine learning Kinasih, Agnes Nola Sekar; Handayani, Anik Nur; Ardiansah, Jevri Tri; Damanhuri, Nor Salwa
Science in Information Technology Letters Vol 5, No 2 (2024): November 2024
Publisher : Association for Scientific Computing Electronics and Engineering (ASCEE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31763/sitech.v5i2.1746

Abstract

This study explores the application of machine learning techniques, specifically classification, to improve data analysis outcomes. The primary objective is to evaluate and compare the performance of Decision Tree and Random Forest classifiers in the context of a structured dataset. Using the Elbow Method for optimal clustering alongside decision tree and random forest for classification algorithms, this research investigates the effectiveness of each method in accurately categorizing data. The study employs K-Means clustering to segment the data and Decision Trees and Random Forests for classification tasks. Dataset used in this research was obtained from Kaggle consisting of 13 attributes and 1048575 rows, all of which are numeric. The key results show that Random Forest outperforms Decision Trees in terms of classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, providing a more robust model for data classification. The performance improvement observed in Random Forest, particularly in handling complex datasets, demonstrates its superiority in generalizing across varied classes. The findings suggest that for applications requiring high accuracy and reliability, Random Forest is preferable to Decision Trees, especially when the dataset exhibits high variability. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of how different machine learning models can be applied to real-world classification problems, offering insights into the selection of the most appropriate model based on specific data characteristics.
Ensemble learning approaches for predicting heart failure outcomes: A comparative analysis of feedforward neural networks, random forest, and XGBoost Ariyanta, Nadindra Dwi; Handayani, Anik Nur; Ardiansah, Jevri Tri; Arai, Kohei
Applied Engineering and Technology Vol 3, No 3 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : ASCEE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31763/aet.v3i3.1750

Abstract

Heart failure is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and early prediction of outcomes is critical for timely intervention and improved patient care. Accurate prediction models can help clinicians identify high-risk patients, optimize treatment strategies, and reduce healthcare costs. In this study, we developed and evaluated machine learning models to predict mortality in patients with heart failure using a medical dataset of 299 patients with 13 clinical variables collected in 2015. Four models were tested, including a Feedforward Neural Network (FNN), Random Forest, XGBoost, and an ensemble model combining all three models. The experimental process included data preprocessing, feature scaling, and stratified cross-validation to ensure robust evaluation. The results showed that the ensemble model achieved the best performance with an ROC-AUC of 0.9134 and an F1 score of 0.7439, outperforming individual models such as Random Forest (ROC-AUC: 0.9117) and XGBoost (ROC-AUC: 0.9130). FNN, despite having the highest accuracy (0.8455), showed lower performance in terms of recall and precision, likely due to its sensitivity to overfitting on small datasets. These results highlight the effectiveness of ensemble learning in medical prediction tasks, especially for handling complex, high-dimensional health data. The proposed ensemble model has the potential to be integrated into clinical decision support systems, enabling real-time risk assessment and personalized treatment plans for heart failure patients. Future research should explore larger, multicenter datasets, incorporate advanced feature engineering techniques, and investigate the integration of deep learning architectures such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) or recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to process sequential data such as ECG signals.
Comparative Analysis of Speech-to-Text APIs for Supporting Communication of the Deaf Community Anik Nur Handayani; Hariyono Hariyono; Ahmad Munjin Nasih; Rochmawati Rochmawati; Imanuel Hitipeuw; Harits Ar Rosyid; Jevri Tri Ardiansah; Rafli Indar Praja; Ahmad Nurdiansyah; Desi Fatkhi Azizah
Indonesian Journal of Data and Science Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Data and Science
Publisher : yocto brain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56705/ijodas.v6i3.327

Abstract

Hearing impairment can have a profound impact on the mental and emotional state of sufferers, as well as hinder communication and delay in accessing information directly that relies on interpreters. Advances in assistive technology, especially speech recognition systems that are able to convert spoken language into written text (speech-to-text). However, its implementation faces various challenges related to the level of accuracy of each speech-to-text Application Programming Interface (API), thus requiring an appropriate deep learning model. This study serves to analyze and compare the performance of speech-to-text API services (Deepgram API, Google API and Whisper AI) based on Word Error Rate (WER) and Words Per Minute (WPM), to determine the most optimal API in a web-based real-time transcription system using the JavaScript programming language and Glitch.com. The three API services were tested by calculating their error rates and transcription speeds, then evaluated to see how low the error accuracy rate was and how high the transcription speed was. On average, Whisper AI had a WER of 0% across all word categories, but its speed was lower than the other two APIs. Deepgram API displayed the best balance between accuracy and speed, with an average WER of 13.78% and 67 WPM. Google API performed stably, but its WER value was slightly higher than Deepgram API. In conclusion, based on the results, Deepgram API was deemed the most optimal for live transcription, as it is capable of producing fast and error-free transcriptions, significantly increasing the accessibility of information for the deaf community.
Performance Comparison of Ensemble Learning Models for Brain Tumor Detection on Augmented MRI Datasets Titaley, Gilberth Valentino; Rismayanti, Nurul; Handayani, Anik Nur; Ardiansah, Jevri Tri
ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah Vol 17, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Prodi Teknik Informatika FIK Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/ilkom.v17i2.2523.86-97

Abstract

Brain tumors are highly fatal diseases, making early detection a critical factor in improving patient survival rates. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become a primary tool in brain tumor diagnosis; however, manual analysis processes are often time-consuming and prone to subjective errors. This study employs a machine learning-based classification model to detect four categories of brain tumors—glioma, meningioma, pituitary, and healthy—with high accuracy. The methods include image segmentation using the U-Net model, which excels in medical image analysis due to its encoder-decoder architecture with skip connections, allowing efficient integration of spatial and contextual information. Features are extracted using HuMoments, known for their invariance to rotation, translation, and scale, ensuring robust spatial pattern representation. Data normalization is conducted using Robust Scaling and L2 Normalization to address outliers and harmonize feature scales, enhancing model performance. The MRI dataset, originally comprising 7,023 images, was augmented to 8,000 images using techniques such as rotation, flipping, and contrast adjustments to improve class balance and minimize overfitting. Three ensemble algorithms—Random Forest, XGBoost, and Stacking—were employed to train the models, with performance evaluation based on accuracy, ROC-AUC, F1-score, and confusion matrix. The results demonstrate that Random Forest achieved the best performance with an accuracy of 72% and an ROC-AUC of 0.91. This study illustrates the potential of machine learning approaches for automated brain tumor diagnosis, with further improvement possible through model optimization and the use of more diverse datasets.
Incremental Effects of Augmentation Strategies on Pre-Augmented Biomedical Waste Detection Using YOLOv11n Jevri Tri Ardiansah; Ahmad Kholish Fauzan Shobiry; Anik Nur Handayani; Mohammad Muzayyin Amrulloh; Taiga Haruta
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026): Article Research July 2026
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v10i3.16531

Abstract

Biomedical waste carries infectious and hazardous risk that makes accurate automated sorting valuable, and object detection offers a path toward automation, yet published studies rarely measure how much online data augmentation contributes once training images carry offline augmentation and mean Average Precision alone can conceal how augmentation shifts the balance between missed detections and false alarms.This study measures the incremental effect of Mosaic, MixUp, and Copy-Paste augmentation on YOLOv11n trained for biomedical waste detection, and verifies whether each augmentation executes as configured. We designed a 2×2×2 factorial ablation across eight configurations, trained YOLOv11n three times per configuration with different random seeds on a 14-class biomedical waste dataset and evaluated each run's best checkpoint on a held-out test set using mean Average Precision, precision, recall, and a corrected confusion matrix retaining the background class. We verified framework behavior through prediction-level identity, loss-level comparison, and instrumented tracing. Configurations combining Mosaic and MixUp raised mean Average Precision by 0.0053 over baseline, MixUp alone raised recall from 0.8950 to 0.9071, and Mosaic with MixUp raised precision to 0.9650. False negatives outnumbered false positives three to one across every configuration, identifying class-versus-background rather than inter-class confusion as the dominant failure mode. Copy-Paste showed zero measurable effect once verified, consistent with its restriction to segmentation tasks in the underlying framework. Online augmentation produces modest but distinguishable, metric-specific gains on pre-augmented biomedical waste data, and verifying framework behavior before attributing results to an augmentation strategy is necessary for reliable reporting.