Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Trias Politika Terhadap Terbentuknya Sistem Politik dan Pemerintahan di Indonesia Ruhenda Ruhenda; Heldi Heldi; Hasan Mustapa; Muhammad Andi Septiadi
Journal of Governance and Social Policy Vol 1, No 2 (2020): DECEMBER 2020
Publisher : Department of Government Studies, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/gaspol.v1i2.18221

Abstract

Penerapan Trias Politika mempunyai beberapa khas tertentu di setiap negara tidak terkecuali Indonesia. Walau tidak secara resmi menyatakan menggunakan konsep-konsep Trias Politika namun apabila dilihat dalam UUD 1945 ternyata Indonesia juga mengacu pada konsep Trias Politika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meninjau konsep Trias Politika menurut John Locke dan Montesquieu terhadap terbentuknya sistem politik di Indonesia. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif serta menggunakan metode Kajian Pustaka, penulis mencari berbagai referensi dari sumber-sumber utama dan menyimpulkan bahwa konsep pembagian kekuasaan yang dilakukan oleh Indonesia cenderung mendekati konsep yang dikemukakan oleh Montesquieu dengan sedikit berbeda pada pemisahan tugas Eksekutif dan Legislatif dimana di Indonesia Presiden dapat mengusulkan rancangan Undang-Undang kepada Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat serta memberlakukan kekuasaan Eksaminatif yaitu kekuasaan mandiri dalam pemeriksaan keuangan negara.The implementation of Trias Politica has certain characteristics in every country, including Indonesia. However, Indonesia does not officially declare to use Trias Politica concepts, but as seen from 1945, Indonesia's Constitution refers to a Trias Politica concept. According to John Lock and Montesquieu, this study aims to review the concept of Trias Politica for the formation of a political system in Indonesia. Using a qualitative approach and using the Literature Review method, the writer seeks various references from major sources and concludes that the concept of power distribution carried out by Indonesia tends to approach the concept put forward by Montesquieu only slightly different in the separation of executive and legislative duties in Indonesia where the president can propose a bill to the House of Representatives and in Indonesia impose an examination power, namely an independent power in the examination of state finances.
From Ancient to Islam: A Political Philosophy Perspective on The Sundanese Triumvirate Mustapa, Hasan; Gozali, Nanang; Naan, Naan
Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam
Publisher : Jurusan Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Universitas Negri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jaqfi.v9i1.33298

Abstract

Political leadership in Sundanese civilisation has existed since the 15th century. Although the mechanics of power transition have evolved ideologically, Tri Tangtu Di Bumi, a philosophical ideal of leadership, is still embedded in Sundanese society's social structure. This knowledge has evolved from the ancient (Sunda Wiwitan) Hindu age to Islam. This study investigates Tri Tangtu di Bumi as a manifestation of Sundanese political philosophy. The method used in this study is a philosophical examination of Sundanese society's triumvirate notions. According to the research findings, Tri Tangtu di Bumi is identical to Trias Politica. This leadership style delegates political power and legitimacy to three individuals: Prabu, Rama, and Resi. Prabu symbolises the government and Rama represents people's voices. Meanwhile, Resi mostly serves as a mediator and judge. Tri Tangtu's spirit can still be found in the lives of the Baduy, Banten, Kampung Naga, Tasikmalaya, and Ciptagelar tribes of Sukabumi today. 
SACRALIZATION OF PANCASILA: IDEOLOGY AND REPRESSION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PANCASILA IDEOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BPIP) AND GUIDELINES FOR THE APPRECIATION AND PRACTICE OF PANCASILA (P4) Mustapa, Hasan; Zulkarnaen, Nanang; Feny Yuniarti, Putri
Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): General Issues
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpi.v9i1.3466

Abstract

Pancasila's role has become an unavoidable topic of dispute. For intellectuals, Pancasila should be an open ideology. The authorities frequently make Pancasila a closed doctrine. Ideology becomes closed when it is officially implemented by the state and interpreted unilaterally to assess incompatibility with societal interpretations. This qualitative study compares New Order government policies to the Guidelines for the Appreciation and Practice of Pancasila (P4) project run by the Pancasila Ideology Development Agency (BPIP). Various journal papers were collected, evaluated, and seen through the lens of ideology and repression. According to the research findings, when Pancasila was institutionalized, such as during the New Order period, it was frequently employed as a beating stick for parties that disagreed with the government's political goals. This potential can also be observed in BPIP during Joko Widodo's tenure, if executed strictly. Pancasila is founded on the principle of openness, which was echoed by the Founding Fathers. Often told behind closed doors using a frozen sacralization procedure.