Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.578
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akta JURNAL MERCATORIA Veteran Law Review Jurnal Hukum Sasana Jurnal Suara Hukum JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Future Academia : The Journal of Multidisciplinary Research on Scientific and Advanced
Beby Suryani Fithri
Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MERCATORIA

 1 
Keamanan Nasional dalam Menghadapi Perubahan Cyber Warfare Putri, Elfirda; Pratama, Gede Aditya; Fithri, Beby Suryani
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL MERCATORIA DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v16i2.9534

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh gambaran tentang cyber warfare dan tantangannya kedepan, strategi cyber security di Indonesia serta penguatan cyber security di Indonesia dalam rangka mewujudkan keamanan nasional. Masalah difokuskan pada bagaimana menjaga keamanan nasional dari ancaman serangan cyber yang mungkin terjadi dan kemungkinan taktik pertahanan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dan deskriptif analitis dengan teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan studi pustaka dari penelitian sebelumnya dan data sekunder.  Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahwa peretas memanfaatkan keresahan masyarakat sebagai celah untuk meluncurkan serangan, mulai dari phishing hingga ransomware, kasus kebocoran data 91 juta pengguna situs belanja online. Kesimpulannya adalah Indonesia dalam keadaan darurat cyber warfare. Strategi yang harus dilakukan adalah Pembentukan undang-undang khusus tentang tindak pidana siber, Peningkatan sumber daya manusia, dan kerjasama stakeholder di dalam negeri dan kerjasama internasional bidang cyber security untuk mewujudkan keamanan nasional.
Comparative Study of Law Enforcement Against Taxation Crimes in Indonesia and Malaysia Mohamed Saniff , Shereeza; Isnaini; Fithri, Beby Suryani; Iswari, S. Salini
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL MERCATORIA JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v17i1.12068

Abstract

This research conducts a comparative study of law enforcement strategies aimed at combatting taxation crimes in Indonesia and Malaysia. The study examines the legal frameworks, enforcement mechanisms, and institutional capacities of tax authorities in both countries. Through an analysis of relevant laws, regulations, and enforcement practices, the research evaluates similarities and differences in approaches to tackling tax evasion, fraud, and non-compliance. Additionally, the study explores the role of collaboration between tax authorities and other government agencies, as well as international cooperation in addressing cross-border tax crimes. By identifying effective strategies and areas for improvement in law enforcement against taxation crimes, the research aims to contribute to the development of more robust and coordinated efforts to combat tax evasion and ensure compliance with tax laws in Indonesia and Malaysia.
Disparity in Judicial Decisions in Narcotics Crimes (A Study of Verdict No. 1192/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Mdn and Verdict No. 1035/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Mdn) Fithri, Beby Suryani
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL MERCATORIA DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v17i2.13145

Abstract

This research aims to analyze inequality in judges' decisions in drug crime cases by studying two court decisions, namely Decision No. 1192/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Mdn and Decision No. 1035/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Mdn. These two decisions involved defendants who were subject to the same sentence despite significant differences in their roles and the amount of evidence found. M. Ramadhan acted as an intermediary with evidence of 0.79 grams of narcotics, while Ari Wibowo was more active in the narcotics network despite only having evidence of 0.04 grams. This research uses a qualitative method with a case study approach to evaluate the factors that influence judges' decisions, such as the role of the defendant and the amount of evidence in sentencing. The results showed that despite differences in the roles and evidence involved, both defendants were sentenced to the same sentence, namely 7 years and 6 months' imprisonment and a fine of Rp 1,000,000,000, with a subsidiary of 1 year's imprisonment. This finding indicates an inconsistency in the sentencing considerations, and suggests the need for stricter standardization in sentencing in drug cases to achieve justice that is more in line with the conditions and facts of each case.
Co-Authors Elfirda Ade Putri Ilham, Arief Mahfud Isnaini Iswari, S. Salini Maswandi Mohamed Saniff , Shereeza Pratama, Gede Aditya Qushaery, Ahmad Rafiqi Serimin Pinem Souad Ahmed Ezzerouali Windy Sri Wahyuni