Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP WANPRESTASI ROYALTY RAHASIA DAGANG DALAM PERJANJIAN WARALABA Bella Katrinasari; Hernawan Hadi
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 5, No 1 (2017): JANUARI-JUNI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v5i1.19364

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of this article is to review the form of the breach law and the legal protection of trade secrets in franchisor business in Indonesia. Collecting primary and secondary law material through literature review technique. Agreement arranged in III KUHP about engagement. In Komala restaurant franchise agreement there are due to law in case of breach, that is when the franchisee do not pay the royalty fee to the franchisor, so franchisee obliged to pay the royalty fee who have not paid to the franchisor interest expense in payment royalty fee. In an culinary enterprise which is franchised must be have a secret like secret ingredients also the business implementation method. Trade secrets in franchise need to be protected to prevent recipe burglaries and unhealthy business competition. The franchisee must replace the loss of the secret company ownership. The franchise agreement is one of the law protection aspects. It is because agreement can be used as strong legal fundament to enforce legal protection of trade secrets and for both sides.Keywords: Franchise, Trade Secrets, Breach.AbstrakTujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui akibat hukum dari kelalaian dalam perjanjian serta perlindungan hukum rahasia dagang dalam bisnis waralaba kuliner di Indonesia. Dengan mengumpulkan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder melalui teknik studi kepustakaan. Perjanjian diatur dalam buku III KUH Perdata tentang Perikatan. Perjanjian waralaba Komala restaurant terdapat akibat hukum dalam hal terjadi wanprestasi, yaitu apabila pihak penerima waralaba tidak membayar royalty fee yang menjadi hak pihak pemberi waralaba, maka diwajibkan membayar royalty fee yang belum dibayarkan kepada pihak pemberi waralaba/franchisor serta bunga keterlambatan dalam pembayaran royalty fee. Dalam suatu perusahaan kuliner yang diwaralabakan pasti memiliki rahasia perusahaan berupa resep rahasia serta metode pelaksanaan bisnis tersebut. Rahasia dagang perlu dilindungi untuk mencegah pencurian resep dan persaingan usaha yang tidak sehat. Pihak penerima waralaba diwajibkan mengganti kerugian terhadap hak kemilikan rahasia perusahaan. Perjanjian waralaba merupakan salah satu aspek perlindungan hukum. Hal ini dikarenakan perjanjian dapat menjadi dasar hukum yang kuat untuk menegakkan perlindungan hukum rahasia dagang dan bagi para pihak.Kata Kunci: Waralaba, Rahasia Dagang, Wanprestasi.
UPAYA KPPU DALAM MENCEGAH PRAKTIK KARTEL DAGING AYAM BROILER Daud Dionesius; Hernawan Hadi
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 7, No 2 (2019): JULI - DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (796.097 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v7i2.39320

Abstract

AbstractThis article describes the suggestion and also efforts made by KPPU in preventing the occurrence of cartel poultry practice in Indonesia. The duties and authorities of KPPU in preventing and avoiding monopolistic practices and unfair business competition conducted by business actors is by giving advice to the government (case study of cartel practice of broiler chicken in Indonesia). This article uses normative legal research methods with prescriptive research properties. The research approach uses legal approach and legal source using primary legal material where the main legal material comes from legislation, secondary law material obtained from legal literature materials, as well as non-legal legal materials that have relevance to the research topic. Based on the research of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 Year 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices (Law No. 5/1999) and Unfair Business Competition was formed to overcome Unhealthy Competition among business actors, one of the Cartel. Indonesia’s poultry industry is due to the impact of cartel allegations that occurred in2015 by some manufacturers. This is done by doing an early rejection of 2 million parent stock, so that broiler chickens circulating in society / consumers to be limited. As a result, the price of broiler chicken meat in the market can rise due to the decrease in the number of offer from the producers. In order to prove the violation and Article 11 (cartel) of Law Number 5 Year 1999, Article 11 requires fulfillment of the agreement element. Nevertheless it has become the duty and authority of KPPU in giving advice to the government and efforts in order to prevent cartel practices especially in the field of poultry happen again. So writer interested to discuss about suggestion and effort of KPPU in preventing poultry cartel.Keywords: Cartel; KPPU; Broiler ChickenAbstrakArtikel ini menjabarkan tentang saran dan juga upaya yang dilakukan KPPU dalam mencegah terjadinya praktik kartel perunggasan di indonesia. Tugas dan kewenangan KPPU dalam mencegah dan menghindari praktik monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat yang dilakukan oleh para pelaku usaha adalah dengan memberikan saran kepada pemerintah (studi kasus praktik kartel daging ayam broiler di indonesia). Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan sifat penelitian preskriptif. Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan sumber hukum menggunakan bahan hukum primer dimana bahan hukum utama berasal dari perundang-undangan, bahan hukum sekunder yang diperoleh dari bahan kepustakaan hukum, serta bahan hukum non-hukum yang mempunyai relevansi dengan topik penelitian. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli (UU No 5/1999) dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat dibentuk untuk mengatasi Persaingan tidak sehat diantara pelaku usaha, salahsatunya Kartel. Industri perunggasan Indonesia tekena dampak dari dugaan kartel yang terjadi pada tahun 2015 oleh beberapa produsen . Hal ini dilakukan dengan cara melakukan afkir dini terhadap 2 juta parent stock, sehingga ayam broiler yang beredar di masyarakat/konsumen menjadi terbatas. Mengakibatkan, harga daging ayam broiler di pasaran bisa naik karena berkurangnya jumlah peawaran dari produsen. Dalam rangka membuktikan terjadinya pelanggaran dan Pasal 11 (kartel) Undnag- Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999, pasal 11 mensyaratkan pemenuhan unsur perjanjian. Namun demikian sudah menjadi tugas dan kewenangan KPPU dalam memberikan saran kepada pemerintah serta upaya dalam rangka mencegah praktik kartel khususnya dibidang perunggasan terjadi kembali. Maka penulis tertarik untuk membahas mengenaisaran serta upaya KPPU dalam mencegah kartel unggas.Kata kunci : Kartel; KPPU; Daging Ayam Broiler
ANALISIS KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PANITIA TENDER DALAM KASUS PERSEKONGKOLAN TENDER DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG- UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG LARANGAN PRAKTIK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT Andryan Dwi Prabawa; Hernawan Hadi
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 6, No 2 (2018): JULI-DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (848.11 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v6i2.24762

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to determine about status tender committe and law enforcement on the tender committe in the case of bid rigging in Indonesia. The research methods is normative descriptive law with the legislation (statue approach) to the regulations relating to The Article 22 of The Act Anti Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition.The kind of data which was used was secondary data which was obtained by using literature review data collecting technique, the next was analyzed by doing law interpretation systematically . The results of the study,  the status tender committe in bid rigging cases in Indonesia according to the elements of The Article 22 of The Act Anti Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition is categorized as the other parties elements vertically. Law enforcement on the tender committee can not be implemented by KPPU because the limited authority of KPPU in enforcing the law against the tender committee.Keyword: Business Competition; Bid Rigging; Tender CommitteeAbstrakKajian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang kedudukan hukum panitia tender dan penegakan hukum terhadap panitia tender dalam kasus persekongkolan tender di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan terhadap peraturan yang berkaitan dengan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Anti Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Jenis data yang digunakan berupa data sekunder yang diperoleh dengan teknik pengumpulan data berdasarkan studi kepustakaan yang selanjutnya dianalisis dengan melaksanakan penafsiran hukum secara sistematis. Adapun hasil kajian yaitu kedudukan hukum panitia tender dalam kasus persekongkolan tender di Indonesia menurut unsur yang terkandung dalam Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Anti  Monopoli  dan  Persaingan  Usaha Tidak  Sehat  dikategorikan  sebagai  unsur  pihak  lain secara vertikal. Penegakan hukum terhadap panitia tender tidak dapat dilaksanakan oleh KPPU karena terbatasnya kewenangan KPPU dalam penegakan hukum terhadap panitia tender.Kata Kunci: Persaingan Usaha; Persekongkolan Tender; Panitia Tender
Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Pstore Glow dan MS GLOW Menurut Asas First To File Clements Laso Jati; Hernawan Hadi
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Maret : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/perkara.v2i1.1779

Abstract

This article discusses the dispute resolution undertaken by Shandy Purnamasari and Putra Siregar related to their Brand disputes, namely MS GLOW and PSGlow which will be reviewed based on the principle of fisrt to File and Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. This type of legal research is perscriptive normative legal research with secondary data types including primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is carried out with literature, then used The analysis technique used is the deductive method. This study produces the author's views on dispute resolution which is reviewed on the principle of First to File.
Legal Consequences If A Debtor Using A Permanent Employee Appointment Decree As Collateral Resigns From Their Workplace Ayu Saraswati, Nandhina; Hadi, Hernawan
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 5 No. 5 (2024): October 2024 ( Indonesia - Uzbekistan )
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v5i5.877

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal consequences if the debtor who uses the guarantee of the Decree of Permanent Employee Appointment resigns from their workplace. This study is normative prescriptive, with a legal approach based on regulations (statute approach) and a conceptual approach. The types and sources of data used are laws and regulations, books on law, scientific journals, scientific articles, and interviews. Data collection through literature studies and the analysis used is description, construction, argumentation, and systematization. The results of this study indicate that debtors who use the guarantee of the Decree of Permanent Employee Appointment resign from their workplace, which results in the guarantee no longer being valid, then online and on-site collection will be conducted until blacklisting in the Financial Services Authority system.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Pstore Glow dan MS GLOW Menurut Asas First To File Clements Laso Jati; Hernawan Hadi
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Maret : Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/perkara.v2i1.1779

Abstract

This article discusses the dispute resolution undertaken by Shandy Purnamasari and Putra Siregar related to their Brand disputes, namely MS GLOW and PSGlow which will be reviewed based on the principle of fisrt to File and Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. This type of legal research is perscriptive normative legal research with secondary data types including primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is carried out with literature, then used The analysis technique used is the deductive method. This study produces the author's views on dispute resolution which is reviewed on the principle of First to File.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK SIAR EKSKLUSIF LIGA INGGRIS: SCM GROUP MENINDAK TEGAS PELAKU PUBLIC VIEWING ILEGAL Anggit Maynurohmah; Hernawan Hadi
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 10 No. 11 (2025): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v10i11.11480

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji terkait dengan perlindungan hukum hak siar SCM Group sebagai pemegang hak siar Liga Inggris Musim 2022-2025. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dengan menggunakan data hukum sekunder dan menggunakan teknik analisis bahan studi kepustakaan (library research). Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa masih banyak venue yang melakukan public viewing ilegal untuk tujuan komersial dengan berbagai macam modus operandi yang dilakukan oleh para pelaku. Berbagai dampak ditimbulkan dari adanya tindakan ilegal tersebut sehingga menyebabkan pihak SCM Group menempuh jalur penyelesaian litigasi dan non-litigasi untuk mendapatkan perlindungan hukum.
Validity Of Notary Deeds And Land Deed Officials Made Electronically Bagaskara Aji, Ilham; Suwandi, Pujiyono; Hadi, Hernawan
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): June 2025 ( Indonesia - Nigeria - Uzbekistan - Philippines )
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v6i2.974

Abstract

This study discusses Government Regulation Number 81 of 2021 which allows deeds to be made electronically which is linked to related laws and regulations in order to review whether electronic deeds are included in authentic deeds or not. This study aims to determine the legal basis for electronic deeds as authentic deeds and to determine the legal problems that will arise if notaries and PPATs make deeds electronically. This type of research is doctrinal normative research with a statutory approach using progressive legal theory. The findings of this study are that electronic deeds with the development of an advanced era like this can become authentic deeds with the note that there must be several regulations that must be changed to recognize electronic deeds as authentic deeds. The conclusion of this study is that electronic deeds produced by an Electronic Information system that has been legalized or guaranteed by authorized professionals in this case a notary and a land deed official are authentic deeds and there are still problems if electronic deeds are implemented, namely: Inconsistency with laws and regulations, There is no definite recognition of electronic deeds as authentic deeds, Validity and authenticity of electronic deeds, No digital evidence and forensics, Lack of infrastructure and readiness of implementers, No implementation guidelines.