Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Ipso Jure

Islamic Perspective On Land Law In Indonesia Aisyah Aisyah
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 7 (2024): Ipso Jure-August
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/xy00ww64

Abstract

This writing has an Islamic view of land ownership in Indonesia, the discussion of which is not only the view of positive Indonesian law, but the view of Islamic Law. The aim is that it can be used as a legal comparison to broaden insight into the concept of land ownership. By comparing legal systems, we can find similarities or differences, so we can find out which one is better. The final conclusion of the writing is that there are several things, namely, First, that the concept of land ownership in positive law in Indonesia, including the Republic of Indonesia, in various applications/rules seeks to regulate the utilization, allocation and use of land for the benefit of humanity in Indonesia, and hereinafter known Ownership rules have a religious communalistic element, referring to the rule of collective rights of members of the customary law community over land, which in the customary law literature is called Ulayat Rights. The rules/concept of land ownership in customary law are: there are Ulayat rights, then the subject is the customary law community, then the object includes all land belonging to the customary law community. The rules/concept of land ownership from the perspective of Islamic law is that everything belongs to Allah Almighty, which is empowered to servants/humans, as humans we must use Allah's law, implement individual and public property rights in a balanced manner, finally there is no system of ownership/landlords. Especially for land rights related to community development, the principle of Community Based Resources Management, namely the principle of structuring natural resources of land and plantations based on the local community, should be expected. In this way, the Land Law will provide guarantees for the development of the ummah, which in turn creates a State that is bandatum toyyibatum wa Rabbun Ghafur, and spreads Rahmad for nature and all the ummah around it.
Therapeutic Agreement Between Doctor and Patient: Juridical Analysis in Civil Law Aisyah Aisyah; Arya Tjipta Prananda; Guslihan Dasatjipta; Afrita Afrita
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): Ipso Jure - June
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/8fnqed72

Abstract

The relationship between doctor and patient is not only ethical and professional, but also has a strong legal dimension, particularly in the form of therapeutic agreements. This agreement forms the basis for initiating medical proceedings and creates a binding legal relationship based on the principles of civil law. This study aims to analyze juridically the existence and validity of therapeutic agreements within the framework of civil law, examine the forms of legal liability arising from violations, and evaluate evidentiary instruments in medical disputes. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative approach, supported by an analysis of legal literature and jurisprudence studies. The results of the study show that although therapeutic agreements are often not stated in writing, their existence is still valid and binding if they meet the legal requirements of the agreement as stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Informed consent serves as proof of the implementation of the agreement and as the basis for legal defense in disputes. Civil liability can be imposed both on doctors personally and hospitals as institutions through the doctrine of vicarious liability, and forms of compensation include material and immaterial losses. Dispute resolution through non-litigation channels such as mediation and the role of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI) also have an important contribution in maintaining a balance between patient protection and medical professional accountability.