Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

HORTATORY AND ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION ANALYSIS ON STUDENT’S WRITING Ratu Dea Mada; Eva Fachriyah; Arifiatul Hasanah
Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature (JELTL) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature
Publisher : FKIP, Universitas Banten Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47080/jeltl.v5i1.1779

Abstract

This research aims to identify how students at second semester in University of Serang Raya can differentiate between hortatory and Analytical Expositions. The method used is descriptive study. The sample of this research are 7 classes of second semester in University of Serang Raya. The tool for data collecting was a written text that students wrote in two kinds of text, Hortatory and Analytical Exposition in a side by side form (2 columns) and a quiz in a google forms. It is hope that by analysing the students’ writing, they are able to comprehend and differentiate the structure and the content of Hortatory and Analytical Exposition
The Effects of Teaching Technique and Reading Habit towards Student’s Writing Skill at Junior High School in Serang Arifiatul Hasanah
Journal of English Language Studies Vol 2, No 2 (2017): Available online in September 2017
Publisher : English Department - University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (326.028 KB) | DOI: 10.30870/jels.v2i2.2242

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to know the interactive effects of teaching technique, peer evaluation and reading habit towards student’s writing skill at Junior High School in Serang. In this research, the researcher used KTSP as the curriculum of the eighth grade of Junior High School in Serang. The research methodology is experiment. The writer got the data by giving questionnaire, treatment, and test. According to ANOVA table, teaching technique got Sig. 0.000 < 0.05. It means that hypothesis null (Ho) is denied and hypothesis alternative (H1) is accepted. So, there is a significant effect of teaching technique towards student’s writing skill. And for reading habit result got Sig. 0.000 < 0.05. It means that hypothesis null (Ho) is denied and hypothesis alternative (H1) is accepted. So, there is a significant effect of reading habit towards student’s writing skill. While for the interactive effects of teaching technique and reading habit got Sig. is 0.607 > 0.05, it means that hypothesis null (Ho) is accepted and hypothesis alternative (H1) is denied. So, there are not any significant interactive effects of teaching technique and reading habit towards student’s writing skill.Keywords : Conventional; Peer Evaluation; Reading Habit; and Writing Skill