Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pranata Hukum Cepalo Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Lex Scientia Law Review
Budiyono Budiyono
Universitas Lampung
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
THE AUDIT AUTHORITY THE STATE AUDIT BOARD OF THE VILLAGE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IN SOLOK REGENCY Budiyono Budiyono; Yusdiyanto Yusdiyanto; Irdham Riyanda
Cepalo Vol 7 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2814

Abstract

Village development is one of the government's agendas in the third nawacita listed in the 2020-2014 RPJMN. Nonetheless, the uncertainty of administrative law related to institutional authority and the mechanism for examining village financial management is still a problem. BPK-RI, as the state financial examiner, has not been explicitly mandated in the package of the State Finance Law to conduct audits of the village government and village finances. This research method was carried out through normative juridical and empirical juridical analysis methods to map the inspection model needed by the village government. The analysis was carried out using the theory of state finances and the theory of state financial audits, and the theory of authority. Research suggests that in the future, an adjustment is needed between the package of Laws on State Finance to align with the package of Laws related to Villages. The results of the study concluded that the authority currently owned by BPK-RI in managing village finances has the potential for arbitrary action (willekeur) by BPK-RI and the potential to submit a lawsuit for authority against BPK-RI in the future. Meanwhile, the village government, represented by the Nagari government in Solok Regency, revealed that the audit carried out by the BPK-RI had been beneficial in encouraging improvements in the performance of the Naga government, nonrequired that the BPK-RI could focus on the SPI audit model and the performance of the Nagari government. Therefore, the ideal inspection model can be carried out through integrated auditing.
Dekonstruksi Urusan Pemerintahan Konkuren dalam Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Daerah Budiyono Budiyono; Muhtadi Muhtadi; Ade Arif Firmansyah
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 17, No 3 (2015): Vol. 17, No. 3, (Desember, 2015)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAK: Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah membawa konsekuensi baru terkait pelaksanaan urusan pemerintahan konkuren antar tingkat pemerintahan di daerah. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mendekonstruksi urusan pemerintahan konkuren pemerintah daerah sehingga akan terlihat titik berat otonominya. Penelitian yang dilakukan dengan koridor doctrinal research dan menggunakan statute dan conceptual approach ini menghasilkan temuan sebagai berikut: Perubahan kewenangan konkuren pemerintah daerah yang diatur dalam UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 membawa konsekuensi terjadinya polemik antar pemerintah provinsi dan pemerintah kabupaten/kota serta infleksibilitas, inefektifitas dan inefisiensi dalam pelaksanaan urusan pemerintahan tertentu, seperti pelaksanaan kewenangan di bidang perizinan pertambangan yang akan lebih baik jika dilaksanakan oleh pemerintah kabupaten/kota karena sesuai dengan aspek perpajakan daerahnya. Hal ini menjadikan pembagian urusan pemerintahan konkuren daerah dalam UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 bernuansa the thinnest version rule of law.   Deconstruction of Concurrent Government Affairs Based on Law Number 23 of 2014 on Local Governance ABSTRACT: The enactment of Law No. 23 of 2014 on Local Governance brings new consequences related to the implementation of concurrent government affairs between levels of local government. This study aims to deconstructing the administration of local government concurrent affairs so that it looks the emphasis autonomy. Research conducted by doctrinal research corridors and using the statute and conceptual approach, resulted in the following findings: The changes of local government concurrent authority as stipulated in Law No. 23 of 2014 brought consequences of a polemic between the provincial government and district/city governments as well as inflexibility, ineffectiveness and inefficiency in the implementation of government affairs, such as the exercise of authority in the field of licensing mining would be better if implemented by the district/city governments because in accordance with aspects of taxation area. This makes the distribution of concurrent local government affairs in Law No. 23 of 2014 shades of the thinnest version rule of law.
Curbing Elitist Populism in Indonesia's Lawmaking: A Constitutional Law Perspective Zulkarnain Ridlwan; Budiyono Budiyono; Muhammad Akib; F.X. Sumarja; Ahmad Irzal Fardiansyah
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): November, 2025: Law, Policy, and Governance in Contemporary Socio-Economic Tran
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i2.27909

Abstract

This research addresses the deficiencies in the scholarly exploration of constitutional law in relation to elitist populism within the legislative framework of Indonesia. The article examines the tendency of elitist populism in Indonesian legislative practice and advocates the idea of curbing it by constitutional law. Elitist populism, in the context of this article, refers to a political approach in which leaders claim to represent the common people, while simultaneously engaging in elitist practices. This study uses a normative juridical research method using statutory and conceptual approaches, and analyzes controversial cases with significant legislation impact. The research findings show that elitist populism in legislative practice is manifested in rapid legislation, and the consolidation of power that minimizes participation fails to reflect public aspirations. To limit these tendencies, constitutional law arrangements in institutional design, supervisory mechanisms, as well as spaces for public participation and awareness, need to be stronger. Therefore, it is recommended to strengthen the institutional rules of the constitutional court, revitalize the supervisory function of the house of representatives, encourage lawmaker’s consistency in the application of meaningful participation, and build public awareness.
PROTECTION OF FOOD GROWING LAND IN LAND ACQUISITION FOR PUBLIC INTEREST Ade Arif Firmansyah; Malicia Evendia; Budiyono Budiyono
PRANATA HUKUM Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Law Faculty of Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/pranatahukum.v21i1.436

Abstract

Infrastructure development has resulted in a decline in rice paddy area, rice production, and rice yields. The harvested rice area in 2024 decreased by 167.57 thousand hectares compared to 2023. This resulted in a decline in rice production in 2024, which amounted to 838.27 thousand tons compared to 2023. This shrinking agricultural land requires model protection of sustainable food agricultural land within the legal framework of land acquisition for public interest. This paper aims to offer a model protection of sustainable food agricultural land in land acquisition law for public interestso it is hoped that it will be able to guarantee protection sustainable food agricultural land and supports the achievement of food security and sovereignty. Using the doctrinal writing method with a conceptual approach and statutory regulations, it was found that: model Protection of sustainable food agricultural land in land acquisition law for public interest is composed of two important aspects, namely planning and institutional coordination. Where these two aspects are things that must be accommodated in change of Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest.
Co-Authors F.X. Sumarja Fardiansyah, Ahmad Irzal Firmansyah, Ade Arif Irdham Riyanda Malicia Evendia Muhammad Akib Muhtadi Muhtadi Yusdiyanto Zulkarnain Ridlwan