Articles
<![CDATA[Kajian Terhadap Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Terpidana Dikabulkan Atas Dasar Novum Dan Kekhilafan Hakim Atau Kekeliruan Yang Nyata Perkara Penipuan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung 21/Pk/Pid/2015) ]]>
<![CDATA[Adimas Wisnu Hidayat]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rustamaji]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 10, No 2: 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i2.67630
<![CDATA[Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui alasan Peninjauan Kembali Terpidana terhadap putusan Judex Facti Pengadilan Negeri Jambi dalam memutus perkara Penipuan serta pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan permohonan Peninjauan Kembali Terpidana dan mengadili kembali sesuai dengan ketentuan Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder, teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode silogisme dan interpretasi dengan menggunakan pola berpikir deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang penulis lakukan, diketahui bahwa alasan Peninjauan Kembali dari Terpidana dalam kasus Penipuan telah memenuhi syarat formal dan syarat material berupa Judex Facti Pengadilan Negeri Jambi dalam memeriksa dan mengadili perkara telah melakukan kekeliruan yang nyata atau kekhilafan dalam memeriksa serta adanya bukti baru atau novum sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 263 ayat (2) huruf a dan c KUHAP serta dasar pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan permohonan Peninjauan Kembali Terpidana membenarkan alasannya, membatalkan putusan Pengadilan Tingkat Kasasi Nomor 1723 K/PID/2012 dan mengadili kembali menyatakan Terpidana telah terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan perbuatan sebagaimana yang didakwakan oleh Jaksa/Penuntut Umum, tetapi perbuatan itu tidak merupakan suatu tindak pidana dan melepaskan Terpidana dari segala tuntutan hukum.Kata kunci: Judex Facti; Novum; Peninjauan Kembali Abstract: This study aims to determine the reason for the Judicial Review of Judison Judgment of the Jambi District Court Court in deciding the case of Fraud as well as the consideration of the Supreme Court granting the request for the Judicial Review and re- trial in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. The research method used is normative legal research. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, techniques of legal material analysis using the method of syllogism and interpretation by using deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of the research that the authors do, it is known that the reason for review of the criminal in the case of fraud has fulfilled the formal requirements and material requirements of Judex Facti Jambi District Court in examining and adjudicating the case has made a real mistake or mistake in checking and the existence of new or novum evidence in accordance with the provisions of Article 263 paragraph (2) a and c of the Criminal Procedure Code and the basis of consideration of the Supreme Court granting the request for Judicial Review of the Accused justify the reason, to cancel the decision of the Court of Cassation Number 1723 K / PID / 2012 and adjudicate to declare a Terpidana has been proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing acts as prosecuted by the Prosecutor / Prosecutor, but the act is not a criminal act and releases the convicted of any lawsuit.Keywords: Judex Facti; Novum; Reconsideration]]>
<![CDATA[RATIO DECIDENDI MAHKAMAH AGUNG MEMBATALKAN PUTUSAN JUDEX FACTIE DAN MENGADILI SENDIRI DALAM PERKARA NARKOTIKA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ivana Gisela Ardelia]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rustamaji]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 2: 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71497
<![CDATA[This research aims to find out the ratio decidendi of the Supreme Court which annulled the Judex Factie’s decision and made judgment on own authority in a narcotics crime case in accordance with Article 256 jo. 255 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is aimed at examining the application of criminal procedural law to the Supreme Court Decision Number 4043K/Pid.Sus/2020 which in its decision annulled the Judex Factie’s decision and made judgment on own authority in a narcotics crime case. This type of research is normative research that is prescriptive and applied with a case approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials, while the technique of collecting primary and secondary legal materials used is literature study. Based on the results of the discussion, that the ratio decidendi in Supreme Court Decision Number 4043K/Pid.Sus/2020 which annullled the Judex Factie’s decision and made judgment on own authority in accordance with the provisions of Article 256 jo. Article 255 KUHAP. This is because the Defendant was not legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a crime as charged in the first or second indictment of the Public Prosecutor.Keywords: Cassation Defendant; Narcotics; Ratio Decidendi]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS PEMBUKTIAN PENUNTUT UMUM PADA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR : 22/PID.SUS/2022/PN.KRG ]]>
<![CDATA[Silvia Meilani Al Islami]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rustamaji]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 2: 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71533
<![CDATA[This research aims to determine the suitability of the Public Prosecutor's evidentiary construction in proving drug abuse for dealers inVerdictNumber 22/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Krg with the evidentiary law. This research is normative or doctrinal legal research. The nature of this research is perscriptive and applied. The approach used in this study is the case approach. The legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used in this study is a literature study. The legal material analysis technique used is a syllogism method with a deductive mindset, which is based on a major premise and a minor premise which is then drawn conclusions.Based on this research, the results were obtained that the construction of proof of the Public Prosecutor in proving drug abuse for dealers in VerdictNumber 22/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Krg has been in accordance with the evidentiary law.Keywords: Proof; Narcotics;Verdict]]>
<![CDATA[KAJIAN PENYIARAN PERSIDANGAN SECARA LIVE DALAM PERLINDUNGAN ANAK DAN PRINSIP PERSIDANGAN TERBUKA UNTUK UMUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Dita Mulyani]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rustamaji]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 2: 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71885
<![CDATA[This article was created to analyze the practice of the live broadcast of the trial. The existence of this practice means that everyone from all ages can participate in witnessing the live broadcast without any restriction, including minors. This article aims to find out the legal principle about the live broadcast of the trial in the child protection concept and the open court principle and to find out the limititations of open court principle on a live broadcast of the trial. This is a normative legal research using conceptual approach. This research shows that the live broadcast of the trials in child protection is carried out by ensuring child protection through the dissemination of useful information and educational materials from the social, cultural, educational, religious, and health aspests and pay attention to child’s importance. The obligations of the television media is to make sure that live broadcast of the trial include on clasification D for audience over the age of 18 years old. The limitation of the live broadcast of the trials is entirely on the role of the judges to determining the open court mechanism by pay attention to the characteristic of the case and to priority the litigants. Meanwhile the interests of broadcasting institution are accesoir after the limitation of the broadcasting law, KPI regulation, and law of criminal procedure.Keywords: Child Protection; Live Broadcast; Open Court principle; Television.]]>
<![CDATA[PEMENUHAN HAK-HAK ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM PADA KASUS RESIDIVIS KLITIH ]]>
<![CDATA[Dominica Shinta]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rustamaji]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 10, No 4: 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i4.72650
<![CDATA[As individuals who are immature both physically and mentally, children are vulnerable human beings. A child has not been able to protect himself because he is not yet considered capable of being held accountable for his actions, considering that he is immature and still growing. The aim of this research is to examine the fulfillment of the rights of children who are in conflict with the law in the case of recidivist klitih in Decision Number 02/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Yyk. Children as perpetrators of crime must receive special protection and protection in accordance with the law, especially in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The results of the research study show that even though the perpetrators of criminal acts in the decision are minors who commit repeated crimes (recidivist), their rights as children who are in conflict with the law must fulfill their rights. This research is intended to provide arguments and serve as a reminder for law enforcers to fulfill the rights of children who are in conflict with the law. Keywords: Children, Children's Rights, Recidivist.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA DI BAWAH MINIMUM KHUSUS PERKARA NARKOTIKA: PUTUSAN NOMOR 215/PID.SUS/2020/PN.JTH ]]>
<![CDATA[Nurul Aulia Fitri]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rustamaji]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 9, No 4: 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72309
<![CDATA[This article aims to analyze the judge's considerations in imposing a sentence below the special minimum for narcotics crime cases by studying the decision of the Jantho District Court Number 215/Pid.Sus/2020/Jth which violates the special minimum criminal provisions in Law No.35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. This research method is a prescriptive normative legal research with a case approach. Based on the research conducted by the author, it was found that in imposing a sentence below the special minimum in the narcotics crime case committed by T. Irfan, the judge made juridical and non-juridical considerations accompanied by the application of combined sentencing theory. This consideration is based on the fulfillment of the elements of the second alternative indictment, the fact that the purpose of possession of narcotics is for self-consumption, the provisions of the SEMA which accommodate the doubts of judges to then be able to commit deviations, and are based on the ability to be responsible, mitigating and aggravating things. The considerations in imposing the sentence are in accordance with legal objectives which are based on legal justice, legal benefits and legal certainty. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the use of articles regarding the possession and control of narcotics is irrelevant because they are always associated with the purpose of use and distribution which are regulated in different provisions so that these provisions seem ambiguous and need to be corrected.Keyword: Judge’s Consideration; Narcotics Crime; Special Minimum Punishment]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBUKTIAN YANG DILAKUKAN PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN DENGAN ANAK ]]>
<![CDATA[Giovanny Andreana Christya]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rustamaji]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 9, No 4: 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72261
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze whether the evidence by the public prosecutor in the criminal case of sexual intercourse with a child based on Decision Number 37/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Krg is in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is included in normative or doctrinal legal research that is prescriptive and applied. This study uses a case approach. In order to collect legal materials in this study, literature study techniques were used by collecting written information from legal materials, which consisted of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. After obtaining the legal material, an analysis is carried out using the deductive syllogism method. The results of this study indicate that the evidence carried out by the public prosecutor is in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code because it has submitted valid evidence according to law, namely witness statements, letters, statements of the defendant accompanied by supporting evidence to prove that the defendant is guilty of committing the crime of sexual intercourse with a child . This study aims to analyze whether the evidence by the public prosecutor in the criminal case of sexual intercourse with a child based on Decision Number 37/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Krg is in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is included in normative or doctrinal legal research that is prescriptive and applied. This study uses a case approach. In order to collect legal materials in this study, literature study techniques were used by collecting written information from legal materials, which consisted of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. After obtaining the legal material, an analysis is carried out using the deductive syllogism method. The results of this study indicate that the evidence carried out by the public prosecutor is in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code because it has submitted valid evidence according to law, namely witness statements, letters, statements of the defendant accompanied by supporting evidence to prove that the defendant is guilty of committing the crime of sexual intercourse with a child.Keywords: evidence, child intercourse]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERSIDANGAN TINDAK PIDANA ELEKTRONIK ]]>
<![CDATA[Hizkia Andhitya Wijaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rustamaji]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 3: 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73615
<![CDATA[This article analyzes the urgency of the evidentiary process in electronic criminal trials. This study aims to determine the importance of the evidentiary process in an electronic crime trial where in an electronic crime the evidence submitted is not only tangible but intangible evidence. This research is a normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. The legal material collection technique used in this study is the document study technique or library study technique. The collection of legal materials is carried out through document studies and literature studies. Based on the results of the research, it shows that proof in electronic crime is the main thing, because in the proof what is sought is material truth, that a crime has occurred and it is the defendant who is guilty of committing it. The court is bound by a rule or methods or provisions of evidence as stipulated in the law. Legitimate evidence must be carried out in court in accordance with the procedures or methods that apply in the law of evidence.Keywords: Evidence, Electronic Crime, Criminal Procedure law]]>
<![CDATA[NILAI DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU ]]>
<![CDATA[Daniel Milano Tarigan]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rustamaji]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 3: 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73452
<![CDATA[There has been a lot of research on obscenity, but the discussion on the use of testimonium de auditu in obscenity cases is of interest to the author. This thesis aims to examine the value and strength of the evidence of the testimonium de auditu and the testimony suitability of witnesses from the testimony of de auditu in cases of sexual abuse of children under the provisions of criminal procedural law. The type of this research is normative legal research which is prescriptive and applied. This legal research uses a case approach. The legal materials used on this research consist of primary and secondary legal materials. The collection of legal material used in this research use library research. The legal material analysis technique used in this law research is the syllogism method with deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the value and strength of evidence in criminal procedural law are all of free value to the judge, as well as the testimony of the testimonium de auditu. Keywords: Testimonium De Auditu; Value and strength of evidence; Witness testimony]]>
<![CDATA[RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Joel Christofel Hinsa Tambun]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rustamaji]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.75165
<![CDATA[This study aims to find out how restorative justice as an alternative dispute resolution in Indonesia and the benefits obtained when compared to conventional criminal justice processes. The type of research used is normative legal research which is prescriptive and applied. This legal research approach uses a case approach. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used is library research. The legal material analysis technique used in writing this paper is the syllogism method with deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of research and discussion it can be seen that the settlement with restorative justice as an alternative settlement of criminal cases focuses on restoring the original conditions between victims, perpetrators and society. Besides that, restorative justice settlement is the answer to the accumulation of files in court.Keywords: alternative dispute resolution; crimes; restorative justice]]>
