Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search
Journal : Verstek

AKIBAT HUKUM DALAM PENETAPAN PENGAMPUAN PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DI PENGADILAN Muhammad Nur Fahmi; Muhammad Rustamaji
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.76141

Abstract

Every human being according to law has the same rights and obligations, but not all of them are capable of carrying out legal actions. For persons with disabilities in carrying out legal actions they are under the protection of this article. The research method was carried out using a descriptive normative approach. Legal materials in the form of documents from library studies, court decisions. Analysis by examining the legal consequences arising from the judge's decision No. 53/Pdt. P/2020/PN Slw Tegal. The results of the study show that the legal consequence of determining the granting of disability by the court is in the form of giving the guardian authority to take legal action. Persons with disabilities are no longer able to carry out legal actions and in carrying out legal activities are carried out by supervisors. The custodian has the responsibility to carry out the mandate to protect those who are assisted in carrying out legal actions.Keywords: Judge's Consideration; Determination of Amnesty; Disabilities
ANALISIS DISPARITAS DALAM PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA “MAIN HAKIM SENDIRI” (EIGENRICHTING). Adhinda Ratih Nuriana; Muhammad Rustamaji
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.73825

Abstract

This study aims to explain the legal considerations of judges in imposing criminal penalties on perpetrators of "eigenrichting" and to analyze the disparities contained in Decision Number 235/Pid.B/2017/PN.Brb and Decision Number 84/Pid.B/2017/PN .snt. This research is a normative legal research with a prescriptive nature of research and uses a case approach. This research shows that the basis of the judge's legal considerations in the two decisions both considered the elements in Article 170 paragraph (2) 3 of the Criminal Code, all of the defendants have been proven to fulfill the elements of the article. However, in legal considerations, the judge considers juridical aspects such as the indictment, elements of the articles charged, charges and pledoi, as well as non-juridical aspects such as the facts found in the trial. Apart from that, based on the judge's legal argument, what gave rise to the disparity in the two decisions was found in the judge's considerations, namely: 1. The aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the defendant; 2. The background of the defendant's actions; 3. As a result of the defendant's actions; and 4. Purpose of sentencing. Apart from that, other factors that cause disparity are the forgiveness of Decision Number 84/Pid.B/2017/PN.Snt and the provision of condolence money to the victim's family.Keywords : Disparity, Legal Considerations