Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Ethics and Liability of Business Actors in Providing Discounts in E-Commerce Transactions Virginnia Melya Iskandar; P. Lindawaty S. Sewu; Daniel Hendrawan
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6336

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the ethics and liability of business actors in providing discounts in e-commerce transactions. E-commerce involves various types of businesses, ranging from small online shops to large companies. With the sophistication of today's technology, it opens up opportunities to cheat for personal gain. Providing fake discounts is one of the concerns of E-Commerce users. The ethics and liability of business actors in providing discounts are the main points demanded by consumers. This research uses normative juridical approach through legislation and assessment of norms and rules applicable in Indonesia. The result of this research is that Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 58 of 2001 concerning the Development and Supervision of the Implementation of Consumer Protection that the Government is responsible for fostering the implementation of consumer protection that ensures the acquisition of consumer and business rights and the implementation of consumer and business obligations. If it is found that business actors violate ethics, the sanctions received can be in the form of social sanctions such as damaging the reputation or good name of the company, reducing the trust of consumers and the public in the related company. The settlement of consumer disputes can be pursued through the court or out of court based on the voluntary choice of the parties to the dispute. Consumers can sue business actors in public courts individually or in groups (class action).
Juridical Analysis of Responsibility of Importers of Used Goods Prohibited from Importing to Buyers of Used Goods Pramono, Inez Putri; Hendrawan, Daniel
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3877

Abstract

The rise in buying and selling of imported second-hand clothing is caused by the government's lack of firmness in imposing sanctions on businesses importing second-hand goods. The purpose of this research is to determine the responsibility of importers which must be followed up by the government and not harm consumers in a normative legal manner. The government should follow up on import activities of used goods which are prohibited according to law by imposing sanctions on importers, including sanctions that apply in Law No. 8 of 1999 and Law No. 7 of 2014.
CORPORATE CIVIL LIABILITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN CIVIL LAW Trianto; Hendrawan, Daniel; Rahmat, Diding
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), February 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Environmental pollution caused by corporations has serious impacts on communities and ecosystems. Civil lawsuits are one of the legal mechanisms used to hold corporations accountable and obtain compensation for the losses caused. This study examines how the mechanisms of evidence and compensation are applied in civil cases against corporations responsible for environmental pollution in Indonesia. Proving environmental cases is not always straightforward, as it requires complex scientific evidence and the involvement of experts. Therefore, the principle of strict liability or absolute liability under Law No. 32 of 2009 on the Protection and Management of the Environment serves as an important legal basis for enforcing environmental justice. Compensation is not only intended to compensate victims for their losses but also as an effort to restore the environment. This study emphasizes the importance of strengthening the capacity of law enforcement officials, enhancing the role of the community, and optimizing environmental courts to ensure that civil litigation mechanisms operate effectively and fairly.
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 5 TAHUN 2018 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME Adzi Rizki; Daniel Hendrawan
LEX LAGUENS: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): LEX LAGUENS: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan (Agustus)
Publisher : YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN DAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RAHMAT HUSADA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.08221/lexlaguens.v3i2.245

Abstract

All studies discuss the crime of terrorism, particularly in the context of judges' decisions and use court decisions as the main object, namely the decision of the district court in East Jakarta. The problems in this study are 1) The legal regulatory mechanism in examining and deciding cases of terrorism crimes? and 2) How is the law enforcement against terrorism cases in Indonesia? This research method uses normative legal research with secondary data. The approaches used are the statutory approach, conceptual and case approach. The analysis used is qualitative. The results of this study indicate that the legal regulatory mechanism in examining and deciding cases of terrorism crimes has carried out legal considerations by paying attention to the juridical, factual, and philosophical aspects in cases of terrorism crimes. The judge carefully examined the criminal elements in the indictment, particularly regarding the defendant's involvement in a banned organization and participation in semi-military military training that leads to terror goals. The application of the principle of legal certainty in Decision Number 812/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Jkt.Tim has been applied by the panel of judges by explicitly referring to the relevant statutory provisions, namely Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism.