Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.048
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JPAP (Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik) (e-Journal) Unram Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Jurnal Ketahanan Pangan Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Notaire Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Dinamika
Benny Krestian Heriawanto
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Tanggung Jawab Yang Lahir Dari Kewajiban Atas Kesehatan Masyarakat Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Dalam Perspektif HAM (Hak Asasi Manusia) Nurika Falah Ilmania; Benny Krestian Heriawanto; Pinastika Prajna Paramita
Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/yur.v5i1.14078

Abstract

Covid-19 is a crucial health issue, as a right that must be fulfilled because it is one of human rights and the state has responsibility for public health in the form of promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative activities, especially in the era of covid 19. knowing the position of public health as part of human rights and the responsibility of the State for the fulfillment of health during the Covid-19 period based on the perspective of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights jo. Health Law Number 36 Year 2009 concerning Health. This research is a normative juridical research, with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach using legal materials in the form of legislation and some relevant literature. The technique of collecting legal materials is carried out by literature study activities using legal materials analysis techniques in the form of grammatical, systematic, and teleological. Interpretations.
Pelanggaran Itikad Baik dalam Subrogasi dan Novasi Subjektif Aktif Sebagian pada Concursus Creditorium Permohonan Pailit Shihaf Ismi Salman Najib; Ahmad Syaifudin; Benny Krestian Heriawanto
Notaire Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v8i2.72212

Abstract

Abstract This research is motivated by the fact that the minimum requirement of two creditors in a bankruptcy petition can be achieved in a way that violates the principle of good faith by using subrogation and partially active subjective novation. This research aims to describe the criteria and legal remedies for violating the principle of good faith by using subrogation and partial active subjective novation to fulfill concursus creditorium in bankruptcy petitions as a form of tort. This research is normative legal research. The result of the research is that active subjective novation cannot be used for partial transfer of receivables. Meanwhile, partial subrogation may be used to transfer receivables. The criteria for violation of the principle of good faith are, 1. The receivables transferred from the old creditor to the third party are not paid in full, are due, and are collectible and 2. The time span between the transfer of receivables from the creditor to the third party and the filing of the bankruptcy petition is less than one year. But not absolute. There are still other indicators. The debtor's legal remedies are filing a cassation to the Supreme Court, tort claims, criminal acts of fraud and/or forgery of letters committed by creditors, and judicial review. Keywords: Good Faith; Subrogation; Active Subjective Novation; Bankruptcy. Abstrak Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi syarat minimal dua kreditor dalam permohonan pailit dapat diraih dengan cara yang diduga melanggar asas itikad baik yakni dengan menggunakan subrogasi dan novasi subjektif aktif sebagian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kriteria dan upaya hukum pelanggaran asas itikad baik penggunaan subrogasi dan novasi subjektif aktif sebagian untuk memenuhi concursus creditorium dalam permohonan pailit sebagai bentuk perbuatan melawan hukum. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian bahwa novasi subjektif aktif tidak dapat digunakan untuk pengalihan piutang sebagian. Sedangkan subrogasi sebagian dimungkinkan digunakan sebagai sarana pengalihan piutang. Kriteria pelanggaran asas itikad baik adalah, 1. Piutang yang dialihkan dari kreditor lama ke pihak ketiga adalah piutang tidak dibayar lunas, sudah jatuh tempo, dan dapat ditagih dan 2. Rentang waktu antara peralihan piutang dari kreditor terhadap pihak ketiga dengan pengajuan permohonan pailit kurang dari satu tahun. Namun tidak mutlak. Masih terdapat indikator lainnya. Upaya hukum debitor adalah mengajukan kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung, gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum, tindak pidana penipuan dan/atau pemalsuan surat yang dilakukan oleh kreditor, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Kata Kunci: Itikad Baik; Subrogasi; Novasi Subjektif Aktif; Pailit.
Penyelesaian Permohonan Pailit Melalui Instrumen Insolvency Test Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Terkait Dalam Kepailitan Muhammad Dito Zakharia; Ahmad Syaifudin; Benny Krestian Heriawanto
Unram Law Review Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Unram Law Review (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v9i2.397

Abstract

Indonesian law has undergone several revisions. Still, with the various revisions, according to the author, it has not provided maximum legal protection and legal certainty to the parties involve in bankruptcy law itself, on the other hand, the Indonesian bankruptcy law regulation is more likely to favor the interests of creditors, can prove this that the bankruptcy law regulation in Indonesia does not require a minimum amount of receivables and does not regulate insolvency requirements. Regarding the lack of regulation of insolvency requirements in bankruptcy applications, this harms debtors who are still solvent as they can be filed for bankruptcy. There is a need for an insolvency test to determine whether the debtor is solvent or insolvent. With the implementation of the insolvency test the bankruptcy legal regime is appropriate because, under it only debtors who are genuinely unable to pay debts can be terminated by bankruptcy given the principle of insolvency. Therefore, implementing the insolvency test in bankruptcy law in Indonesian will provide legal certainty for debtors and protection to solvent debtors. In conducting this legal research, a normative juridical methodology was employed, drawing on statutory conceptual, and comparative approaches.
Co-Authors Ahmad Syaifudin DWI SURYANTO Isdiyana Kusuma Ayu Langgeng Rachmatullah Putra Muhammad Dito Zakharia Pinastika Prajna Paramita Retno Wulan Sekarsari Shihaf Ismi Salman Najib Taufiq Rahman Ilyas