Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Hybridity in Transitional Justice: Legacy of The “Khmer Rouge Tribunal” Danijel Apro; Sudarmo Sudarmo
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 30, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (376.781 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.30061

Abstract

AbstractCountries throughout the world practice several forms of transitional justice, hoping to attain peace, democratic stability and reconciliation. They apply different mechanisms to achieve these goals. Thispaper offers a theoretical analysis of foundation, proceedings and legacy of the Extraordinary hambersin the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC). First, the Author examines the notion of the analysis of hybrid courts as a way of overcoming constraints that criminal justice mechanisms in post-conflict societies may face. Second, the Author explores the so-called “Khmer Rouge Tribunal”. Due to the significance and controversies that surround the ECCC, its work attracts great attention. Furthermore, political will is critical, so these hybrid judicial institutions should have more international support in terms of political means, funds, dissemination of results, and complementary mechanisms of transitional justice.IntisariNegara-negara di seluruh dunia mempraktikkan beragam bentuk keadilan transisional, dengan harapan untuk memelihara perdamaian, stabilitas demokrasi, dan rekonsiliasi. Mereka menerapkan mekanisme yang berbeda-beda untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut. Penelitian ini menyajikan analisis teori yang dilakukan terhadap landasan, proses, dan pengaruh Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC). Pertama-tama, penelitian ini meninjau gagasan mengenai analisa terhadap pengadilan hibrida sebagai cara untuk mengatasi kendala yang dihadapi oleh mekanisme pengadilan pidana di masyarakat pascakonflik, dan kedua, mengeksplorasi apa yang disebut “Pengadilan Khmer Rouge”. Karena signifikansi dan kontroversi yang menyelubungi ECCC, karyanya menerima perhatian yang besar. Tekad secara politis sangat penting, sehingga pengadilan hibrida ini dapat memperoleh dukungan internasional lebih banyak dalam hal sarana politik, dana, penyebaran hasil, dan mekanisme untuk melengkapi keadilan transisional.
Reformasi Birokrasi Pelayanan Publik dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Kesehatan di RSUD Dr. Moewardi (Pencanangan Pembangunan Zona Integritas WBK & WBBM) Estining Nur Kartika; Sudarmo Sudarmo
Ministrate: Jurnal Birokrasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah Vol 4, No 2 (2022): Birokrasi dan Pemerintahah di Daerah 8
Publisher : Jurusan Administrasi Publik FISIP UIN SGD Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jbpd.v4i2.17941

Abstract

Bureaucratic reform has the meaning of major changes in Indonesian governance to create good government agencies in providing services to the community. Various government agencies are competing to commit to bureaucratic reform, one of which is regional hospitals which are bureaucratic institutions engaged in health services. Hospitals that work in the medical or health sector bear a double burden because they have to guarantee the quality of health services and also organize their bureaucracy. Therefore, efforts to reform the public service bureaucracy in hospitals are interesting to be studied further. Through qualitative research, this article analyzes the process of reforming the public service bureaucracy at RSUD Dr. Moewardi in improving the quality of health services. Data were obtained from interviews, observations, and document analysis on the direction of changes in bureaucratic reform to improve the quality of public services which were then analyzed using the PDCA cycle (plan, do, check, act). Through this analysis, it can describe the efforts of RSUD Dr. Moewardi in controlling the commitment to bureaucratic reform to improve the quality of public services.
Resolving conflict communication of multinational mining companies: PT Vale Indonesia and the local community Nur Azizah Fitrianti; Andre Noevi Rahmanto; Sudarmo Sudarmo
Jurnal ASPIKOM - Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Vol 9, No 2 (2024): Jurnal ASPIKOM
Publisher : Asosiasi Pendidikan Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi (ASPIKOM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24329/aspikom.v9i2.1546

Abstract

The conflict between PT Vale Indonesia and the Kuari community in East Luwu Regency demonstrates the ongoing clash between the company's legal rights to mining land and the community's dependence on the same land for housing and livelihoods. This research investigates the communication dynamics underlying the conflict through a qualitative case study method, using in-depth interview techniques with 12 informants from the company, local government and community. The results showed that formal meetings held through formal and informal dialog facilitated dialog on land access and use. The shift of some community attitudes from protest to limited engagement demonstrates the effectiveness of the dialog. Although, the core contradiction between state-sanctioned legality and community-based recognition remains. Applying Relational Dialectics Theory, this research shows how unequal discourses shape community and company interactions. The research recommends strengthening inclusive dialogue and recognition of community-based land management to promote more stable and equitable company-community relations.
The All-Seeing Algorithm: Panopticon and Surveillance of the Docudrama “The Social Dilemma” Rahma Dhian Karisma Putri; Andre Noevi Rahmanto; Sudarmo Sudarmo
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE) Vol 6 No 1 (2025): January
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jee.v6i1.1259

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the concept of Michel Foucault’s panopticon in the modern digital context, as depicted in the docudrama The Social Dilemma. The research focuses on understanding the surveillance mechanisms of social media and their psychological impacts on user behavior. Methodology: This research uses a qualitative approach with content analysis as the primary method. The object of study is the docudrama The Social Dilemma on Netflix. Data collection involves observation, documentation studies, and literature reviews from Scopus.com and other websites to identify how digital surveillance is portrayed and its effects on users. Main Findings: The study finds that social media platforms use advanced surveillance algorithms to monitor, influence, and control user behavior. These mechanisms form a digital panopticon where users feel constantly watched, leading to behavioral adjustments. The psychological impacts include anxiety, depression, and addiction, particularly among teenagers, driven by the normalization of constant digital surveillance. Novelty/Originality of this study: This study uniquely applies Foucault’s panopticon theory to analyze the influence of digital surveillance depicted in The Social Dilemma. The novelty of this research lies in its application of Foucault’s panopticon theory to digital platforms, providing new insights into the psychological and behavioral consequences of algorithmic surveillance. However, the study is limited by focusing on a single docudrama, which may not comprehensively represent the full spectrum of digital surveillance practices. Future research should expand on this analysis by examining broader datasets or additional media to validate these findings.