Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGARUH MOTIVASI KEDISIPLINAN DAN KEPEMIMPINAN TERHADAP PRESTASI KERJA PETUGAS KEBERSIHAN Afrinaldy Rustam
Sosial Budaya Vol 13, No 2 (2016): Desember 2016
Publisher : Lembaga penelitian dan pengabdian kepada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/sb.v13i2.3536

Abstract

Duty by Institution at duty Market, Hygiene and Gardening is the development of hygiene area and beauty of urban region. this Area development is maximally hence from Environment Ministry will give the appreciation in the form of " Appreciation Adipura". Research On duty Market, Hygiene And Gardening of Kampar representing government organization which obliged to give the service as well as possible to society. Special for the hygiene of Bangkinang required a Hygiene Officer which with quality and delay comprehending its function as hygiene officer reaching of cleanest town so that get the Appreciation of Adipura of hygiene area. In line with formula of is problem of and target of research hence method analyse the data used in this research Doubled Analysis Regretion where Coefficient of regretion variable motivate the (X1) = 0,137 this show the level of the variable influence to labour capacity. Koefisen Regresi of leadership variable (X3) = 0,364. this show the level of the variable influence to labour capacity. For the Coefficient of regresi 0,776 representing constant value showing positive sign with the meaning without existence of variable motivate the, discipline and leadership hence labour capacity will go up equal to 0,776 times.
THE DYNAMICS OF COURT DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL DISPUTE OVER GOLD SALES BETWEEN PT ANTAM TBK AND BUDI SAID AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF CIVIL LAW IN INDONESIA Martha Hasanah Rustam; Duwi Handoko; Afrinaldy Rustam; Muhammad April
Jurnal Saintifik (Multi Science Journal) Vol 23 No 2 (2025): MEI
Publisher : Fakultas Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58222/js.v23i2.439

Abstract

This study examines the litigation trajectory of the gold sales dispute between PT Aneka Tambang Tbk (Antam) and Budi Said across four judicial levels in Indonesia: the Surabaya District Court, the Surabaya High Court, the Supreme Court at the cassation stage, and two rounds of judicial review (Peninjauan Kembali). Employing a normative legal research design, the analysis draws on statutory provisions, court decisions, and scholarly literature to assess the application of tort elements in sale contracts. Findings reveal divergent interpretations of tort elements (unlawful act, loss, causation, and fault) at each judicial tier: the District Court and the Supreme Court (cassation and first judicial review) affirmed the presence of tort, obligating Antam to deliver 1.136 tons of gold or pay compensation; the High Court rejected the claim entirely; and the second judicial review reversed Antam’s obligation based on new criminal findings against Budi Said. These oscillating verdicts generate legal uncertainty, blur the line between breach of contract and tort, and underscore the need for harmonization between civil and criminal proceedings and the standardization of tort evidentiary rules. Recommended measures include issuing consistent Supreme Court jurisprudential guidelines, clarifying corporate authority in contractual engagements, and strengthening internal corporate oversight.