Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dimensi Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal HAM Jurnal Hukum Respublica Ensiklopedia of Journal Menara Ilmu Ensiklopedia Social Review Jurnal Trias Politika Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Jurnal Sosio-komunika Riau Law Journal Jurnal Saintifik JURNAL RUANG HUKUM Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia El Dusturie: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-undangan Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Duwi Handoko
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Persada Bunda, Pekanbaru
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
PERBANDINGAN ANTARA MAHKAMAH AGUNG DAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI PELAKU KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA HANDOKO, DUWI
Menara Ilmu Vol 11, No 74 (2017): Vol. XI Jilid 1 No. 74, Januari 2017
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/mi.v11i74.72

Abstract

The 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 confirms that Indonesia is a country of law. The one important principle of state of law is the guarantee of the implementation of independent judicial power, free from the influence of other powers to organize judiciary to enforce the law and justice. This study is based on the curiosity of investigators in uncovering the scope and existence of judicial power in Indonesia. The scope and existence were restricted to two state institutions in the field of the judiciary, the Supreme Court (SC) and the Constitutional Court (CC). Therefore, this study aims to identify and analyze the comparison (similarities and differences) between the authority of the SC and the CC. This study views of its kind is a normative legal research. While the views of nature, descriptive study. SC and the CC have the same authority to be a court decision that is both first and last. SC and the CC provides access to people who can not afford as the recipient of legal aid to be able to act. SC have jurisdiction in the enforcement of the criminal law, while the CC, does not have jurisdiction in the enforcement of the criminal law, but the CC decision related to the decriminalization of significant influence in the enforcement of criminal law. SC and the CC differ in their patterns and the supervision of the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court. SC and the CC different in terms of a court decision is final and binding. The SC decision, are not the first and last because is final and binding and there is also not final but is already binding. There are differences of transparency in the legislation review in the SC and the CC. Keywords: The Rule of Law, Attribution Power, Judicial Power, Justice.
PERBANDINGAN ANTARA MAHKAMAH AGUNG DAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI PELAKU KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA HANDOKO, DUWI
Menara Ilmu : Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Ilmiah Vol 11, No 74 (2017): Vol. XI Jilid 1 No. 74, Januari 2017
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/mi.v11i74.72

Abstract

The 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 confirms that Indonesia is a country of law. The one important principle of state of law is the guarantee of the implementation of independent judicial power, free from the influence of other powers to organize judiciary to enforce the law and justice. This study is based on the curiosity of investigators in uncovering the scope and existence of judicial power in Indonesia. The scope and existence were restricted to two state institutions in the field of the judiciary, the Supreme Court (SC) and the Constitutional Court (CC). Therefore, this study aims to identify and analyze the comparison (similarities and differences) between the authority of the SC and the CC. This study views of its kind is a normative legal research. While the views of nature, descriptive study. SC and the CC have the same authority to be a court decision that is both first and last. SC and the CC provides access to people who can not afford as the recipient of legal aid to be able to act. SC have jurisdiction in the enforcement of the criminal law, while the CC, does not have jurisdiction in the enforcement of the criminal law, but the CC decision related to the decriminalization of significant influence in the enforcement of criminal law. SC and the CC differ in their patterns and the supervision of the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court. SC and the CC different in terms of a court decision is final and binding. The SC decision, are not the first and last because is final and binding and there is also not final but is already binding. There are differences of transparency in the legislation review in the SC and the CC. Keywords: The Rule of Law, Attribution Power, Judicial Power, Justice.
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM TENTANG REGULASI KEJAHATAN TANPA KORBAN DI KAWASAN ASIA Handoko, Duwi; Sukri, Beni
Ensiklopedia Sosial Review Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Volume 1 No 1 Februari 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v1i1.281

Abstract

Victimless crime is an important thing to know, both in terms of aspects related to crime patterns and imposition of sanctions against violator. The reason is that it is not appropriate to punish someone who does not harm others.In a discussion that the author does, it is not appropriate if someone is punished for having the potential to become a "criminal". An illustration of this can be read in this research. This research was conducted to reveal the comparison of the legal system (similarities and differences between Civil Law, Common Law, and Islamic Law) related to crime without victims in the Asian region. To achieve these objectives, the research method applied is normative legal research with the nature of descriptive research. The equation of the Civil Law, Common Law, and Islamic Law systems related to the regulation of crime without victims in the Asian region is only an aspect of prohibiting illegal drug users. Whereas the differences are: In the context of gambling players: Indonesia, which implements Civil Law and Saudi Arabia that apply Islamic Law, expressly prohibits every citizen to play gambling, both in the real world and in cyberspace. Whereas in Malaysia, which applies a dual legal system (Islamic Law and Common Law), gambling is a limited legal act. What is that? And how is the comparison in the context of prostitution and narcotics users? The answer can be known from the results of this research.
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM TENTANG REGULASI KEJAHATAN TANPA KORBAN DI KAWASAN ASIA Duwi Handoko; Beni Sukri
Ensiklopedia Social Review Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Volume 1 No 1 Februari 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v1i1.281

Abstract

Victimless crime is an important thing to know, both in terms of aspects related to crime patterns and imposition of sanctions against violator. The reason is that it is not appropriate to punish someone who does not harm others.In a discussion that the author does, it is not appropriate if someone is punished for having the potential to become a "criminal". An illustration of this can be read in this research. This research was conducted to reveal the comparison of the legal system (similarities and differences between Civil Law, Common Law, and Islamic Law) related to crime without victims in the Asian region. To achieve these objectives, the research method applied is normative legal research with the nature of descriptive research. The equation of the Civil Law, Common Law, and Islamic Law systems related to the regulation of crime without victims in the Asian region is only an aspect of prohibiting illegal drug users. Whereas the differences are: In the context of gambling players: Indonesia, which implements Civil Law and Saudi Arabia that apply Islamic Law, expressly prohibits every citizen to play gambling, both in the real world and in cyberspace. Whereas in Malaysia, which applies a dual legal system (Islamic Law and Common Law), gambling is a limited legal act. What is that? And how is the comparison in the context of prostitution and narcotics users? The answer can be known from the results of this research.
Kajian Terhadap Hak atas Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan serta Hak atas Pekerjaan Duwi Handoko
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v3i1.987

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the freedom to embrace religion and belief and fulfill the right to work in Indonesia. This type of research is normative legal research specifically discussing human rights in the field of religion and work. Regulation on the role and sanction for the government in the context of guaranteeing religious freedom, especially for Muslims, is very important. One form of legal vacuum in the regulation of religious freedom in Indonesia is in the context of the release of someone from Islam who aims to save humanity (of course also for other religions in Indonesia) and embrace other religions of his own free will. Regulations regarding the role and sanctions for the government in the context of guaranteed rights to obtain decent jobs, especially at productive age, are very important. Technically, it is clearly impossible for employers to recruit workers if there are no jobs in accordance with the capacity of the company's needs. From this, it can be said that the fulfillment of the right to work has a correlation with other types of rights so that a worker can have competence. The amount of unemployment that cannot be reduced by the Indonesian government and discriminatory treatment is a form of violation of the right to work.
SEJARAH PEMBENTUKAN DAN KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA Rustam Rustam; Tat Marlina; Duwi Handoko
JURNAL DIMENSI Vol 11, No 2 (2022): JURNAL DIMENSI (JULI 2022)
Publisher : Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33373/dms.v11i2.3973

Abstract

Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui ide constitutional review untuk pertama kalinya, tokoh yang berperan terhadap ide judicial review, dan format constitutional review di Indonesia pada saat ini. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang khusus membahas tentang politik hukum judicial review di Indonesia. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan secara sistematis berdasarkan rumusan masalah dan diuraikan secara kualitatif. Ide constitutional review (dalam format judicial review) untuk pertama kali diterapkan di Amerika Serikat. Tokoh yang berperan terhadap ide judicial review adalah Hans Kelsen, pakar hukum asal Austria.  Format constitutional review di Indonesia saat ini adalah tunggal, yaitu menjadi kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam bentuk judicial review.  
PERKEMBANGAN POLITIK HUKUM PRAPERADILAN DI INDONESIA Duwi Handoko; Rustam Rustam; Tat Marlina
JURNAL TRIAS POLITIKA Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Oktober 2021, Jurnal Trias Politika
Publisher : Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33373/jtp.v5i2.3577

Abstract

Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui perkembangan kewenangan lembaga praperadilan di Indonesia dan organ negara manakah yang berperan dominan dalam menetapkan perubahan terhadap kewenangan lembaga praperadilan di Indonesia pada saat ini. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang khusus membahas tentang politik hukum praperadilan di Indonesia. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan secara sistematis berdasarkan rumusan masalah dan diuraikan secara kualitatif. Perkembangan kewenangan lembaga praperadilan di Indonesia diawali dengan menambah kewenangan praperadilan sampai dengan kewenangan penyidik untuk bisa menetapkan kembali subjek hukum (orang dan/atau badan hukum) sebagai tersangka dengan alat bukti yang sama. Selanjutnya, organ negara yang berperan dominan dalam menetapkan perubahan terhadap kewenangan lembaga praperadilan di Indonesia pada saat ini adalah Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) yang ditinjau dari aspek kekuasaan organ negara berada pada cabang kekuasaan yudikatif (bukan eksekutif bahkan legislatif). Hanya saja, produk hukum yang ditetapkan oleh MK tersebut lebih bersifat membentuk peraturan perundang-undangan yang merupakan kewenangan dari organ negara legislatif dan eksekutif.
Klasifikasi Dekriminalisasi dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Duwi Handoko
Jurnal HAM Vol 10, No 2 (2019): Edisi Desember
Publisher : Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (550.058 KB) | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2019.10.145-160

Abstract

Penelitian ini memfokuskan kajian mengenai periodisasi dan klasifikasi dekriminalisasi terhadap pasal-pasal dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dengan teknik pengumpulan data secara studi kepustakaan. Jenis data yang digunakan di dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang disajikan secara kualitatif. Dekriminalisasi terhadap delik-delik dalam KUHP pada periode setelah reformasi memiliki perbedaan yang sangat signifikan dengan dekriminalisasi pada periode sebelum reformasi. Setelah reformasi, dibentuk lembaga yang berwenang melakukan dekriminalisasi terhadap delik, baik delik yang terdapat di dalam KUHP maupun delik yang terdapat di luar KUHP. Terdapat empat klasifikasi dekriminalisasi dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia, yaitu dekriminalisasi bukan murni, dekriminalisasi murni, dekriminalisasi murni sebahagian, dan dekriminalisasi bersyarat. Bukan murni berarti suatu delik masih tetap berlaku dan memiliki kekuatan hukum (legal). Murni berarti suatu delik sudah tidak berlaku dan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum (tidak legal atau tidak sah). Murni sebahagian berarti suatu delik masih tetap berlaku dan tetap memiliki kekuatan hukum (legal atau sah) terhadap unsur perbuatan pidana yang masih berlaku. Bersyarat berarti menegaskan syarat tertentu dalam hal berlakunya suatu delik secara legal
Hudud Terhadap Pencurian dan Penodongan atau Perampokan Dibandingkan Dengan Ketentuan Hukum Pidana Positif Indonesia Duwi Handoko
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019): Oktober
Publisher : Prodi Siyasah (Hukum Tata Negara) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (440.29 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2019.9.2.338-359

Abstract

Allah exaggerated the threat of punishment for the perpetrators of the hijab above the threat of punishment for the perpetrators of murder or theft. This threat applies not only if the acts of hirabah are committed to Muslims, but also if they are carried out to other religious people who live under Islamic rule. Allah has mentioned the forms of punishment for the perpetrators of hirabah crimes, namely being killed (if they are only human lives without robbery), killed by crucifixion (if killing and seizing the victim's property), crossing their arms and legs crossed (those who only seizing property and not killing the victim), disposed of (if only the perpetrator commits terror or scares the victim by threatening). The threat of punishment for violent theft according to Article 365 of the Criminal Code is: Article 365 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code (imprisonment for a maximum of nine years), Article 365 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code (imprisonment for a maximum of twelve years), Article 365 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code (jail sentence of fifteen years at the most). Article 365 paragraph (4) of the Criminal Code (capital punishment or life imprisonment or for a certain period of twenty years at the most).
TINDAK PIDANA TANPA KORBAN DI INDONESIA PENGATURAN DAN PROBLEMATIKANYA Duwi Handoko
Menara Ilmu Vol 12, No 3 (2018): Vol. XII No. 3 April 2018
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/mi.v12i3.707

Abstract

The term of victimless crime in positive criminal law in Indonesia is contained in only one law, namelyLaw Number 11 Year 2012 on the Criminal Justice System of the Child. Although in the law, the term"criminal act" without a victim is found, but there is no definition about that. Some of the behaviorscategorized as victimless crime are drunks, vagrants, gambling, prostitution, and drug use.Related to the pattern of setting up the crime without victims in Indonesia, the following conclusions areobtained: abortion, homosexuality and gambling are regulated in and outside the Criminal Code, vagrantsare only regulated in the Criminal Code, drug dependence is only regulated outside the Criminal Code, andnot rules for perpetrators and prostitution services, whether administered within or outside the CriminalCode.The problem of law enforcement on non-victim crimes in Indonesia is: abortion is not just about legalmatters. Therefore, international human rights bodies seek to avoid the issue of abortion. The prohibition ofmuddle life is a matter unrelated to the obligation of the state to care for the poor and neglected children.The problem of drug dependence is caused by the existence of "double standard" in the framework of lawenforcement which clearly and firmly arranged in Article 121 and Article 127 of Law Number 35 Year 2009about Narcotics. The problematic of prostitution is that there is no negative impact (punishment) forperpetrators and users of prostitution services. The problem of gambling is that the Criminal Code does notprohibit gambling activities. So, it is true that he is called a crime, but not forbidden, and instead givenpermission.Keywords: Victimless Crime, Prostitution, Abortion, Gambling
Co-Authors Afrinaldy Rustam Alamsyah, Rahmad ASRIL, FERRY Beni Sukri Beni Sukri Ferry Asril Hamler Hamler Hulaimi HULAIMI Irfan Ardiansyah Irfan Ardiansyah Khairul Azwar Anas Laia, Lewiaro Lewiaro Laia Lewiaro Laila Marlina, Tat Martha Hasanah Rustam Meidizon Muhammad April Rahmad Alamsyah Rahmad Alamsyah Reza Azurma Riadi Asra Rahmad Rustam Rustam Rustam Rustam Sukri, Beni Tat Marlina Tat Marlina Tat Marlina Tat Marlina Turisnur, Iva