Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Humaniora Jurnal Politik Profetik Kajian Jurnalisme
Faruk HT
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
KISAH PENJARA ETIS DAN FILOSOFIS: ANALISIS LINTAS BUDAYA ATAS TEMBOK TIDAK TINGGI KARYA A. SAMAD ISMAIL DAN MEREKA YANG DILUMPUHKAN KARYA PRAMOEDYA ANANTATUR Faruk HT
Humaniora Vol 20, No 2 (2008)
Publisher : Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (59.34 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jh.939

Abstract

Dalam masyarakat pascamodern seperti sekarang paradigma dalam kajian Sastra bandingan perlu diubah, dari usaha untuk menemukan keseragaman ke keanekaragaman. Tulisan ini mencoba melihat perbedaan antara Melayu dengan Indonesia dengan membandingkan novel Pramoedya Anantatur dengan Samad Ismail. Hasilnya, kedua novel tersebut memperlihatkan perbedaan yang tajam dalam usaha memahami dan memaknai kehidupan. Pramoedya memandang penjara secara filosifis, sedangkan Samad Ismail melihatnya secara etis. In a post-modern culture and society, literary comparative studies need to offer a new paradigm. In addition to finding similarities between national literatures, they also need to consider their differences. This paper attempt to investigate some possible differences between Pramoedya Anantatur’s novel entitled Mereka yang Dilumpuhkan and that of Samad Ismail entitled Tembok Tidak Tinggi. The results show that both novels have different perspectives in describing and signifying ‘prison’. The former novel deals with it from a philosophical perspective while the latter from an ethical one.
POLITIK NEGOSISASI DISKURSUS REKONSOLIASI 1965 DAN IMAJI KEINDONESIAAN PASCA-ORDE BARU Narwaya, St.Tri Guntur; HT, Faruk; Budiawan, Budiawan
JPP (Jurnal Politik Profetik) Vol 6 No 1 (2018): June
Publisher : Department of Political Science, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (715.322 KB) | DOI: 10.24252/profetik.v6i1a4

Abstract

During the dynamics of Post New Order Regime, various efforts to initiate the idea of ‘1965 reconciliation’ have emerged. Steps to reconciliation have been smoothly running. Formally, TAP MPR Number 5 Year 2000 and Law Number 26 Year 2000 have noticeably stipulated the issue. Reconciliation is considered one alternative to resolve violation of past crimes. The stipulation of the Law Number 27 Year 2004 on Truth and Reconciliation Commission was expected to reflect a great step to succeed. Nevertheless, this step has been challenged, which led to the abolishment of the Law on Truth and Reconciliation Commission by Constitutional Court (MK). After its abolishment, various efforts have been done in order to renegotiate and to provide new tactics and initiatives. Some initiatives have met and achieved their intended objectives. Some find them as successful efforts, while some others either individuals or members of social and religious organizations, as well as government elites consider those reconciliation initiatives as critical threats to the state. Some negative responses are firmly connected to dominating narratives of phobia or anti-communism, which remain flourishing until nowadays. Some contestations and narrative articulations are frequently related to the discourses of anticommunism, which have in some cases hindered the reconciliation efforts. Indeed, there is a need to deeply deciphering the future narratives of the 1965 reconciliation, particularly in the post New Order development.
Menyoroti Jurnalisme Warga: Lintasan Sejarah, Konflik Kepentingan, dan Keterkaitannya dengan Jurnalisme Profesional Eddyono, Aryo Subarkah; HT, Faruk; Irawanto, Budi
Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Kajian Jurnalisme
Publisher : Journalism Study Program, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (262.888 KB) | DOI: 10.24198/jkj.v3i1.21762

Abstract

Jurnalisme warga, yang praktiknya masih bisa ditemui, adalah proses produksi informasi yang dilakukan warga biasa atas peristiwa yang terjadi di sekitarnya di berbagai media. Meskipun terlihat egaliter dan inklusif, pada kenyataannya praktik jurnalisme warga timpang dan diskriminatif. Artikel ini menunjukkan awal mula perjalanan jurnalisme warga dan hal apa saja yang melatarinya. Tujuannya adalah memberikan alternatif pandangan awal mula kehadiran jurnalisme warga, baik di dunia maupun di Indonesia. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara, observasi, dokumen, serta kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa praktik jurnalisme warga sudah sejak lama ada, bahkan lebih tua dari jurnalisme itu sendiri. Jurnalisme warga muncul karena kritik atas jurnalisme profesional yang partisan dan terlalu berorientasi pada pasar; perkembangan teknologi internet; situasi di mana jurnalisme profesional sejak awal keberadaanya tidak bisa dilepaskan dari warga; dan keinginan mendapatkan keuntungan. Di balik itu semua, kepentingan-kepentingan besar yang membayanginya adalah jurnalisme itu sendiri (jurnalisme profesional), demokrasi (kebebasan berekspresi dan menyampaikan pendapat), serta pasar. Ketiganya saling terkait dalam memotivasi kehadiran jurnalisme warga.
Co-Authors Aryo Subarkah Eddyono Budi Irawanto Budiawan Budiawan Handayani, Suzie Narwaya, St.Tri Guntur Purwani Istiana