Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

The Effect of Business Level Differentiation, Integrated Level Strategy and Corporate Level Strategy on Competitive Advantage is Mediated by Internal Innovation at Indonesian Army Hospitals Akbar Akbar; Bahtiar Usman; Sarfilianty Anggiani
Journal of Social Science Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of business level differentiation strategies (Business Level Strategy Differentiation), Integrated Level Strategy (Integrated Level Strategy), and Corporate Level Strategy (Corporate Level Strategy) on Competitive Advantage in military hospitals. In addition, this study also explores the role of internal innovation as a mediating variable in the relationship between business strategy and competitive advantage. Taking into account the unique challenges faced by TNI AD hospitals, this research contributes to understanding how business strategies can increase competitiveness through internal innovation. This research was carried out quantitatively using a sampling method using the total sampling technique, where the number of samples used was 162 leaders of TNI AD class C hospitals. Data processing was carried out using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method with SmartPLS Ver 4 software to analyze the relationship between exogenous and endogenous variables and test the mediating role of internal innovation in the model. The results of the study show that from several hypotheses tested, business level strategies (Business Level Differentiation) do not have a direct influence on competitive advantage or internal innovation. However, the Integrated Level Strategy and the Corporate Level Strategy have a positive effect on competitive advantage and internal innovation. In addition, internal innovation has been shown to mediate the influence of integration-level strategies on competitive advantage, but it does not mediate the relationship between business-level strategies and corporate-level strategies on competitive advantage. The theoretical implications of this study confirm that an integrated organization-level strategy can improve competitiveness through operational efficiency and innovation. Managerially, these findings indicate that military hospitals need to strengthen their culture of innovation and optimize integration strategies so that internal innovation can contribute more significantly to competitive advantage. The limitation of this study lies in the scope of the sample that only involves TNI AD class C hospitals, so the results cannot necessarily be generalized to hospitals with different levels or ownership. This research has a novelty in applying the concept of corporate strategy in the context of non-profit public service organizations, especially military hospitals. The study also combines three types of business strategies in one integrative model, providing a holistic perspective on how different strategies can complement each other in improving hospital competitiveness.
The Role Of Ambidextrous Leadership Moderates The Effect Of Supply Chain Network Risk Drivers On Financial Performance Arya Irawan Putra Palguna; Bahtiar Usman; Henny Setyo Lestari
Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan Vol. 13 No. 5 (2025): JIMKES Edisi September 2025
Publisher : LPPM Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37641/jimkes.v13i5.3866

Abstract

This study aims to examine the influence of supply chain network risk drivers on supply chain exploration and exploitation practices and their implications for financial performance. This research uses a quantitative approach with descriptive and verification methods. The observational units consisted of 92 executives from manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The findings reveal that supply chain network risk negatively impacts exploration and exploitation practices, with implications for company financial performance. Exploitation has a positive and significant impact on financial performance, whereas exploration does not exhibit a significant effect. Although the direct effect of network risk on financial performance is insignificant, ambidextrous leadership has been shown to positively and significantly moderate this relationship. The managerial implication of this study is that strengthening exploitation practices is key to maintaining financial performance when facing supply chain risks. Ambidextrous leadership plays a crucial role in transforming the impact of risks into opportunities by emphasizing the need for adaptive leadership in uncertain situations. This research is original in its study of the moderating role of ambidextrous leadership in the risk-performance relationship, a study that is still limited in operations management and supply chain studies.   Keywords: Supply Chain Network Risk Drivers, Supply Chain Exploration & Exploitation practices, Ambidextrous Leadership and Firm Financial Performance.