Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK E-SOSPOL Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik JIPAGS (Journal of Indonesian Public Administration and Governance Studies) Creative Research Journal Bandung Conference Series: Economics Studies JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
Pius Suratman Kartasasmita
Jurusan Ilmu Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK

 1 
EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Pius Suratman Kartasasmita
Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol. 1 No. 1 (2002): Jurnal Administrasi Publik, Tahun 1, Nomor 1, Agustus 2002, ISSN 1412 - 7040
Publisher : Centre for Public Policy and Management Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (183.442 KB)

Abstract

Tulisan ini mencoba menggali gagasan mengenai apa dan bagaimana revitalisasi sistem pendidikan dan pelatihan yang didasarkan pada landasan teoritis dan pengalaman empiris dalam kaitannya dengan administrasi publik dalam menghadapi otonomi daerah dan perubahan global yang tidak bisa dihindari. Administrasi publik sebagai suatu ilmu, seni dan juga suatu profesi akan memberikan pengaruh dalam memilih dan mendidik pegawai negeri. Oleh karena itu pendidikan untuk administrator publik harus diarahkan pada kemampuan untuk dapat memahami kerangka konseptual administrasi publik, politik, konstitusional, kultural dan perubahan lingkungan yang sedang berlangsung.
Decentralization and Community Welfare : Lesson Learnt From Indonesia and The Case of Special Autonomy of Papua Pius Suratman Kartasasmita
Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol. 11 No. 1 (2014): Jurnal Administrasi Publik, Volume 11, Nomor 1, April 2014, ISSN 1412 - 7040
Publisher : Centre for Public Policy and Management Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (501.093 KB)

Abstract

Decentralization refers to a commonly accepted meanings of reversing the concentration of administration at a single center and conferring powers of local government. Therefore, it is regarded as a political phenomenon capturing delegation of power to lower level of government. The main objective of decentralization is to create the most efficient and accountable form of government possible. Three forms of decentralization are recognised, deconsentration, delegation and devolution. The claims of this article, first of all, is to advocate social accounts at explainning the level of community welfare across communities. Having discussed theoretical as well as empirical accounts on the relationship between decentralization policy and community welfare, it is concluded that such relationship is inconclusive and ambigue. The case of Special Autonomy of Papua demonstrate an extreme case of paradoxical decentralization policy aimed to foster welfare for local people in particular the welfare of indigenoeous Papuans.Despite the fact of inclusive results and ambiguity, it also reveals that many studies strongly indicated that dicentralization policy predict improvement of community welfare at least through four mechanism, such as fiscal capacity, administrative capacity, institutional design of policies and the role of local political leadership. Given that all, this article finally comes to five recommendations. Firstly, tohave a closer and serious attention on social accounts that works at mediating any technical organization including decentralization policy. Secondly, to take rigorous measures on local community welfare both objective as well as subjective measures. Thirdly, to articulate the need for rigorous measure on performance of local government using both an official local government performance measurement system such as EKPPD, EDOB and EKPOD as well as an internationally accepted measures such as ISO, CAF and the like. Fourtly, to continue applying community development strategy as well as enforcing greater roles of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs). Finally, to recommend the need for more systematic research agenda and rigorous assesment on both theoretical ground type of research as well as applied policy type of research that employs both quantitative and qualitative approach as well as comparative study and case study in order to make decentralization works for improving welfare across communities.Keywords: decentralization, social accounts, community welfare, stuctural mediation, Papua. 
Revitalisasi Konsep Publik Dalam Pemikiran dan Praktek Pembangunan Kota Bandung Lestari Pius Suratman Kartasasmita
Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015): Jurnal Administrasi Publik, Volume 12, Nomor 1, April 2015, ISSN 1412 - 7040
Publisher : Centre for Public Policy and Management Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (396.306 KB)

Abstract

Sustainable development is defined as the ability to ensure the fulfillment of the needs of the present without sacrificing the ability of future generations to meet their needs. The concept of sustainable urban development is crucial because at the beginning of the 21st century, more than half of the world's population live in urban areas. By using the concept of sustainable development and comparing the empirical facts about the reputation of the city of Bandung with other cities in Indonesia, this paper aims to a hypothesis stating that the realization of becoming a champion city of Bandung, as politically announced by its mayor, remains a tremendous challenge. Four critical issues need to be addressed, both by city government of Bandung as well as by its citizens, in order to promote sustainable urban development. These are, firstly, how to meet the considerable needs of the entire population of Bandung as the fight against poverty through employment and adequate public services. Secondly, how to establish a political system that guarantees the participation of the population Bandung effectively in the decision making process and ensure the application of greater democracy in both national and international levels. Thirdly, how to control the number of population and to promote lifestyle changes, both the manager and the people. Fourthly, how to build political will at encouraging all of them can be realized. At the end, this article concludes that the revitalization of publicness as central concept in sustainable development has now met its momentum, yet it needs the tireless efforts.
Co-Authors Diana, Muthya Firdaus, Rasya Gandhi Pawitan Inten Safitri Kuswandy Jeffri Yosep Simanjorang Neng Dewi Himayasari Tutik Rachmawati Yohanes Andika Tjitrajaya