Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Implication of the Globalization on the Pancasila-Based Principles of Local Democracy in Indonesia Seno Wibowo Gumbira; Jamal Wiwoho
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 6, No 2 (2019): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (348.969 KB)

Abstract

Abstract           The liberalism principles have influenced the whole life aspects of the nation and the state of Indonesia. On the political aspect, the principles influence the elections in Indonesia from the lowest (village head election) to the highest (presidential election) levels. The liberal principles are not in accordance with the principles of Pancasila as the national philosophy and the source of law (staatsfundamental norm) of Indonesia.  The liberal democratic principles cause high cost democracy. They create the conditions of ‘free fight’ and ‘homo homini lupus’, as well as many potential corruption practices in villages. In addition, it can lead to the most worrying issue –the damage of values of Pancasila.Implikasi Pengaruh Globalisasi atas Diseminasi Prinsip-Prinsip Demokrasi Liberalisme terhadap Prinsip-Prinsip Demokrasi Lokal (Desa) berdasarkan Pancasila di Indonesia AbstrakPengaruh prinsip-prinsip liberalisme telah mempengaruhi seluruh bidang kehidupan bangsa dan negara Indonesia. Pengaruh dalam bidang politik dapat ditemukan pada pemilihan umum yang dilakukan secara voting baik tingkat pemilihan presiden hingga tingkat pemilihan kepala desa di Indonesia, tentunya hal tersebut tidak sesuai dengan Prinsip Pancasila yang merupakan falsafah bangsa dan sumber hukum (staatsfundamentalnorm) di Indonesia. Dampak diseminasi prinsip demokrasi liberalisme melalui voting menyebabkan demokrasi dengan biaya tinggi (high cost) menciptakan kondisi free fight dan homo homini lupus serta banyaknya potensi praktik korupsi di desa dan hal yang paling mengkhawatirkan adalah terjadinya pengikisan nilai-nilai yang terkandung dalam Pancasila.Kata Kunci: Globalisasi, Pancasila, Prinsip Demokrasi LiberalDOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n2.a8
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PUBLIK DAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Ratna Nurhayati; Seno Wibowo Gumbira
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 6, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.6.1.2017.41-66

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to whether the actions of government (bestuurshandeling) based on its discretion can be classified as a criminal act of corruption or not. The Methodology of this research used juridical doctrinal. The result showed that based on legal frame such as Law of The Administrative Court, Law of ASN, Law of Government Administration and legal doctrines as well as the Decision of the judicial review of the Constitutional Court Number: 25 / PUU-XIV / 2016 responsibility of governmental actions (bestuurshandeling), which comes from discretionary (Freies ermessen) containing elements of abuse of authority resulting state loss but there is no element of corruption such as gratifications, bribe, then it can be accounted for by the administrative sanctions under the Law of Government administration Article 20 (6) and Article 80 paragraph (1) Jo Article 81 paragraph (3) in a balanced and case by case. If there is an element of abuse of authority that resulted in state loss and there are elements of corruption such as gratifications, bribe, then accounted for under the criminal law, especially corruption.Keywords: Public responsibility, corruption, governmental actions (bestuurshandeling), Public discreations (Freies Ermessen)
POLITIK HUKUM PENGUATAN FUNGSI NEGARA UNTUK KESEJAHTERAAN RAKYAT (Studi Tentang Konsep Dan Praktik Negara Kesejahteraan Menurut UUD 1945) Agus Riwanto; Seno Wibowo Gumbira
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 6, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.337-360

Abstract

According to the constitution, the state concept in constitutional practice can be divided into two opposite poles, namely welfare and liberal state. They have different characteristics in which the first concept (welfare state) requires a strong and extensive state functions to regulate an economic justice, on the contrary the second concept (liberal state) relies on the free market economy which state’s role should be marginalized. Sosio-legal research is used in this article. Based on the Article 33 of Indonesian post constitutional amendment of 1945, Indonesia embraced the concept of welfare state. Yet, the practice sociologically tends to embrace a liberal state that is not suitable with the welfare of the people. There are challenges, in the context of liberal state, faced by Indonesia, such as applying the capitalist economic system. We may fight the capitalist economic system by two legal policy, namely: first one, we may re-create the role of state functions as a controller and regulator of the economy. The second one, we may increase the state income through taxes along with the higher social spending to achieve the social welfare and economic justice.Keywords: welfare state, the constitution of 1945, legal policy