Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Yustisia

THE IMPLICATIONS OF EXPANDING THE AUTHORITY OF THE PRETRIAL POST-VERDICT JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN DECIDING WHETHER IT IS A VALID DETERMINATION OF THE SUSPECT AGAINST LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE SUSPECT Seno Wibowo Gumbira; Ratna Nurhayati; Purwaningdyah Murti Wahyuni
Yustisia Vol 7, No 1: April 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i1.19014

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are implications of expanding the authority of the pretrial post-verdict judicial review of Constitutional Court in deciding whether it is a valid determination of the suspect against law enforcement and the protection of the rights of the suspect. This research belongs to normative research. The results of this study explain that the interpretation method used in pretrial decision  No:04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jak.Sel is the method of discovery of analogy interpretation law (argumentum per analogiam) is wrong, while the legal interpretation method used in the judicial review judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 is the historical interpretation method (historiche intepretatie) the problem namely, the Constitutional Court has exceeded its original function that is negative legislator became positive legislators form or add a new norm. So that raises the problem that is contrary to the principles of the criminal justice system that is the principle of quick and simple and low budget justice and the principle of litis finiri oportet also inhibits the process of law enforcement settlement.
THE IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TRANSACTIONS LAW AGAINST CYBER BULLYING BY SUBSQUENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION RELATED TO THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH Seno Wibowo Gumbira; Daryono .Daryono; Ratna Nurhayati
Yustisia Vol 6, No 2: August 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v6i2.12298

Abstract

This article aimed to observe the criminal provisions both in the Formulation of the EIT ACT 2008 along with the verdict of the judicial review of the Constitutional Court Number 50/PUU-VI/2008 as well as the EIT ACT  2016 especially in strictly contained in article 27 along with the norm of the criminal sanctions contained in Article 45 can still be said to be a ”Rubber Articles”, so it requires linguist and religious leaders in order to get a description or explanation of a remark or action in conflict with religious values and modesty as well as decency in public life. The Guarantee Of Freedom Of Speech. Then when viewed from the highest norm of the 1945 Constitution to the level of the law that is Article "Number 9 of 1998 and Article Number 39 of 1999 there is a harmony of norms and limits of freedom of speech that is the norms and values of religion, morality, public order, public interest and the integrity of the State, the concept of punishment against the actions of cyberbullying in social media in the future require an integral approach and the concept approach is criminal on parole and penal mediation with the terms limitedly and imperative.Â