Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.405
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Citizenship: Media Publikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Hukum Novelty Gender Equality: Internasional Journal of Child and Gender Studies Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Abdi Masyarakat International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation (IJEMI) Jurnal Hukum Malahayati Jurnal Jurisprudence
Gatot Sugiharto, Gatot
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Humanities Education Energy Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
The implementation and effectiveness of Indonesian Supreme Court Rule No. 3 of 2017 on women victims of the sexual violence in Yogyakarta Anggraeny, Kurnia Dewi; Kamaludin, Aang; Khakim, Mufti; Sugiharto, Gatot
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILD AND GENDER STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/equality.v9i2.18069

Abstract

PERMA (Supreme Court Rule) No. 3 of 2017 issued by the Supreme Court regulates the attitude guidelines for judges in adjudicating women's cases in conflict with the law, both criminal and civil cases involving women as victims, witnesses, or parties. These regulations can be used as a legal basis by judges in adjudicating cases of women in conflict with the law due to criminal acts of sexual violence. This research aims to determine the effectiveness of implementing PERMA No. 3 of 2017 concerning guidelines for adjudicating cases of women in conflict with the law as a result of victims of sexual violence at the Yogyakarta District Court. The method used in this research is empirical normative, which focuses on collecting information obtained from judges at the Yogyakarta District Court regarding the effectiveness of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 against women as a result of victims of sexual violence. The approach methods that the author uses in this research include the conceptual approach, the statutory approach, and the case approach. The data collection method is through interviews and documentation of judges, and the data analysis used is descriptive-qualitative. This research concludes that PERMA No. 3 of 2017 has been quite effective in accordance with the theory of legal effectiveness, which uses several a quo decisions as samples to determine whether PERMA No. 3 of 2017 has been applied and implemented in the Yogyakarta District Court for women victims of sexual violence.
How is Student Entrepreneurial Motivation at Ahmad Dahlan University? Sugiharto, Gatot; Bhakti, Caraka Putra; Fajri, Choirul; Anwar, Astrid Nabilah; Ariyani, Dian
International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12928/ijemi.v5i1.7861

Abstract

This study aims to describe the entrepreneurial motivation of students who have taken entrepreneurship courses. The technique used in this research is purposive sampling and accidental sampling. This research was conducted at Ahmad Dahlan University, with several respondents of 801 students. The instrument used is an entrepreneurial motivation scale adapted by Nugroho (2017) using the motivational aspects developed by Vanesaar et al. (2006), namely the aspects of ambition for freedom, self-Realisation, and pushing factors. Test this validity by comparing the r count's value with the r table, then by calculating the r count (rxy) for each item using the CORREL formula in excel. Reliability is calculated using the Cronbach alpha formula. It is found that student entrepreneurship motivation is in the high category. The highest aspect is in the Ambition for Freedom aspect, and the lowest is in Self Realisation. The Ambition for Freedom aspect with details strongly agrees with a frequency of 218 (27.22%), and the agree category with a frequency of 518 (64.67%). Aspects of Self Realisation with respondents' answers in the strongly agree category with a frequency of 153 (19.10%), the agree category with a frequency of 357 (44.57%), the category disagrees with a frequency of 291 (36.33%).
Analysis Of Legal Discovery Methods By Judges In Rechterlijk Pardon's Perspective to Solve Criminal Cases Sugiharto, Gatot; Mira Julita Sari; Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny; Fauzan Muhammadi
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 1, June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i1.4397

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This research aims to ascertain the legal discovery process that judges use to assess whether to grant rechtlijk pardon in order to resolve criminal cases, as well as the challenges judges encounter while attempting to do so. Methodology: Normative legal research was used in this paper. Normative legal research, which is carried out in the literature review in the form of pertinent legal regulations and norms, is a scientific research technique grounded in the logic of jurisprudence (doctrine) to seek truth from a normative perspective. Results: The study's findings lead to the following conclusions: firstly, judges can perform rechvorming through the use of the construction legal discovery method, which takes the form of legal narrowing or legal refining, while determining rechterlijk pardon. Secondly, in carrying out the revision, the court employed the process of finding construction law based on restorative justice. Applications of this study: The study gives a more comprehensive understanding analysis, given that the current criminal law formulation policy does not embrace the value of genuine forgiveness by judges. However, judges retain very particular authority in cases where the defendant has been legally and convincingly established to have committed a criminal conduct, but the judge may grant forgiveness without imposing a sentence. Novelty/Originality of this study: A concrete decision that has become jurisprudence as an implementation of Rechvorming with the discovery of construction law in the form of legal refinement (narrowing of the law) by judges in the perspective of Rechterlijk Pardon is the North-East Jakarta District Court Number 46/Pid/78/UT/Wanita and the North-East Jakarta District Court Decision Number 90/PID/1976/TIM. The Panel of Judges takes into account the seriousness of the offense, the offender's personal circumstances, or the circumstances surrounding the crime at the time it was committed when awarding a rechterlijk pardon. The existence of peace between the parties, justice, and humanity may also be taken into consideration by the judicial panel while deciding whether to prosecute or take no action of parties as an extra option for deciphering rechterlijk pardon. Keywords: Legal Discovery, Judge, Rechtlijk Pardon   ABSTRAK  Tujuan Penelitian: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses penemuan hukum yang digunakan hakim dalam menilai apakah akan memberikan pengampunan hukum (rechtlijk pardon) untuk menyelesaikan kasus pidana serta tantangan yang dihadapi hakim dalam melakukannya. Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian hukum normatif yang dilakukan dalam bentuk kajian literatur berupa peraturan hukum dan norma yang relevan adalah teknik penelitian ilmiah yang didasarkan pada logika yurisprudensi (doktrin) untuk mencari kebenaran dari perspektif normatif. Hasil Penelitian: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan beberapa kesimpulan berikut: Pertama, hakim dapat melakukan pembentukan hukum melalui metode penemuan hukum konstruksi yang berupa penyempitan hukum atau pemurnian hukum dalam menentukan rechterlijk pardon. Kedua, dalam melakukan revisi, pengadilan menggunakan proses penemuan hukum konstruksi berdasarkan keadilan restoratif. Aplikasi Penelitian: Penelitian ini memberikan pemahaman dan analisis yang lebih komprehensif mengingat kebijakan formulasi hukum pidana saat ini tidak mengadopsi nilai pengampunan sejati oleh hakim. Namun, hakim tetap memiliki kewenangan khusus dalam kasus di mana terdakwa secara sah dan meyakinkan terbukti melakukan tindakan pidana tetapi hakim dapat memberikan pengampunan tanpa menjatuhkan hukuman. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas Penelitian: Keputusan konkret yang telah menjadi yurisprudensi sebagai implementasi Rechvorming dengan penemuan hukum konstruksi dalam bentuk pemurnian hukum (penyempitan hukum) oleh hakim dalam perspektif Rechterlijk Pardon adalah Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor 46/Pid/78/UT/Wanita dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor 90/PID/1976/TIM. Majelis Hakim mempertimbangkan keseriusan pelanggaran, keadaan pribadi pelaku, atau keadaan di sekitar kejahatan pada saat itu dilakukan saat memberikan rechterlijk pardon. Keberadaan perdamaian antara pihak-pihak, keadilan, dan kemanusiaan juga dapat dipertimbangkan oleh majelis hakim saat memutuskan untuk menuntut atau tidak melakukan tindakan terhadap pihak-pihak sebagai opsi tambahan untuk menafsirkan rechterlijk pardon.  Kata Kunci: Penemuan Hukum, Hakim, Rechtlijk Pardon
Co-Authors Adit Arief Firmanto Aditia Arief Firmanto Adrianto, Surya Aniza Amelia Anwar, Astrid Nabilah Ariyani, Dian Caraka Putra Bhakti Chandra Muliawan Choirul Fajri Elda Octivia, Annisa Emilia Oktaviani Farsida, Farsida Fauzan Muhammadi Firdaus, Muhammad Yusron Fithriatus Shalihah Handayani, Tutwuri harlyana, cyntya Insyiera, Nayla Kamaludin, Aang Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny Martinouva, Rissa Afni Mira Julita Sari Mufti Khakim, Mufti Nurlis Effendi Rahma Ayu Larasati Rodhiyya, Zaenab Amatillah Surya Adrianto Tubagus Muahammad Nasarudin