Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

p-Index From 2021 - 2026

0.882

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Journal of Development Research JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW LEGAL BRIEF

Audyna Mayasari Muin

universitas hasanuddin

Author-ID : 3072326

Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

The Role of Granting Expert Information By The Indonesian Financial Examiner's Loss on the Judge's Decision In Proof of Criminal Offense Sultan Sa'aduddin Akib; Andi Muhammad Sofyan; Audyna Mayasari Muin
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (759.376 KB)

The study aims to analyze the role of expertory by the Indonesian finance ministry on assessing the state's losses to the judges decision on alleged criminal corruption and the obstacles it faced by the finance ministry's giving expert testimony in judicial proceedings. The type of research used by the writer is the type of empirical law study. The study is conducted at the finance ministry of the Indonesian Republic of Sulawesi representative and the makassar district court. The legal material used is the primary law ingredient, the data obtained directly from interviews and secondary law materials, data through literature, books, journals, and legislation studies. The material of the law is qualitatively analyzed and presented in descriptive terms. The results of the research, concluded that, (1) The role of giving expert information by BPK is important but evidence is not binding on the judge to render a ruling. So that the judge has the right and freedom to make an appraisal of his perfection and truthfulness, and the judge can either accept, regard and make into consideration the giving of expert information by the body of the financial examiner or not. (2) In general, there are 2 (two) obstacles to proving a link to the criminal corruption, which is a drawback to the country's limited human resources, time for checkups and budgets. And also obstacles during the process of giving expert explanations that include, psychological obstacles, communication barriers, inappropriate congregation schedules, impaired professional health, and lack of material mastery by the expert.

Law Enforcement Of The Crime Of Illegal Fishing In The Waters Area Of Pangkajene Regency And The Islands Muhammad Fauzi Ramadhan; Abd. Asis; Audyna Mayasari Muin
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 3 (2022): August: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Law enforcement of illegal fishing in the waters of Pangkajene and the islands has not been effective. This research is an empirical normative research, combining the normative legal approach to legislation with empirical elements in the form of interviews. The results of the study show that law enforcement of criminal acts in the field of fisheries in the Pangkajene and archipelagic waters has not been effective, this is due to a conflict of norms between one regulation and another related to the marine and fisheries sector, which causes law enforcement officers to find it difficult to implement which rules to enforce. In addition, the existence of an ego-sectoral relationship between law enforcement officers causes law enforcement to still not go hand in hand with each other and the ability of prosecutors and judges to complete the mighty crime of illegal fishing in the Pangkajene and Kepualuan districts.

Analysis of Evidence for the Crime of Money Laundering That Does Not Require Preliminary Proof of the Predicate Crime Musdayanti; Abd. Asis; Audyna Mayasari Muin
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 5 (2022): Desember: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

This study aims to analyze the the Legislative Ratio Article 69 UURI No. 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering that Does Not Require Proof of Excess Preliminary Crime in the Crime of Money Laundering. The research was conducted using a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the process of handling money laundering cases is essentially very dependent on the original crime as contained in the provisions of Article 2 UURI No. 8 of 2010 which is an element in the crime of money laundering must come from a criminal act. In line with the above basis, Article 69 has been formulated which reads “In order to be able to carry out investigations, prosecutions, examinations in court proceedings against the crime of money laundering, it is not necessary to first prove the original crime”. Where the crime of money laundering can be investigated, prosecuted, and brought to court without having to first prove the original crime and not having to wait for the verdict of the predicate crime which has permanent legal force (inkracht).

Co-Authors Abd Asis Aminuddin Ilmar Andi Muhammad Sofyan Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana Muhammad Fauzi Ramadhan Musdayanti Ratu Indra Kasih Pratiwi Sultan Sa'aduddin Akib Yustika Mahdania

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search Journal : LEGAL BRIEF

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : LEGAL BRIEF