Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.888
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam
Muntaha Artalim Zaim
International Islamic University Malaysia
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Dawâbit Al-Igtiyâl al-Ma’nawî fi al-Fiqh wa al-Qânûn al-Indûnîsî: Dirâsah Muqâranah Tahlîliyah Imam Sujoko Sujoko; Hossam el-Dien Ibrahim el-Safy; Muntaha Artalim Zaim
AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial Vol. 16 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia IAIN Madura collaboration with The Islamic Law Researcher Association (APHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/al-lhkam.v16i1.5024

Abstract

This study purposes to analyze the issue of character assassination in perspective of Islamic Jurisprudence and Indonesia’s Law. Many people get involved in the criminal case on character assassination. Different ways in understanding and interpretating the meaning of character assassination are main problem in this article. It particularly focuses on the measurement of character assassination in Islamic Jurisprudence and Indonesia’s Law. This study is based on library research referring to books, journal articles, and official sites related to the topic. The data was then described and analyzed with the approach of Islamic Jurisprudence and Indonesia’s Law. The result of the study shows that character assassination should have measurements, as a standard of evident in which any practice of character assassination issue must be referred to. Additionally, there are some exceptional cases in which the practice of character assassination is permissible juridically and legally for Maslahah (advantage).
The Phenomenon of Pregnant Muslim Marriages in Lintau Buo Utara, Tanah Datar, West Sumatra Zulfan Zulfan; Makmur Syarif; Arlis Arlis; Muntaha Artalim Zaim; Arif Taufiq
FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman Vol 8, No 2 (2022): 11 Articles, Pages 189-376
Publisher : IAIN Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/fitrah.v8i2.5529

Abstract

A marriage where the woman is pregnant due to adultery is considered uncommon and taboo in Muslim society. The pregnancy is always kept secret by the prospective married couple and their families. The pregnant Muslim women marriage rate in Lintau Buo Utara is quite high. This study focuses on the case of pregnant women's marriages, specifically how the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) officers may learn about the prospective bride's pregnancy and the family's actions after the prospective bride gives birth. The research was carried out in the form of a field study using the socio-legal research method with interviews conducted with relevant parties in this case. The results concluded that the majority of pregnant marriages at KUA Lintau Buo Utara were predominantly experienced by young couples at elementary and junior high education levels. KUA officials could discover about the future bride's pregnancy by observing the attitude of the prospective partner or their families during the registration process, the answers of the partner throughout the interview session,  and the results of the examination done by the Public Health Center staff. The family's stance towards the pregnant woman's marriage is that the couple will hold a remarriage after the bride gives birth. The new findings in this study are related to the way KUA officers reveal the state of the prospective bride's pregnancy, which was originally kept secret. This is very important to be applicable to KUA officers in other areas.
Islamic Law at the Grassroot; SIGMA Program at Bhasa Radio Situbondo and Its Controversy Nawawi; Muntaha Artalim Zaim; Ahmad Azaim Ibrahimy; Yasid; Abdul Hamid Achak
Al-Ihkam, Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Vol 18 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia IAIN Madura collaboration with The Islamic Law Researcher Association (APHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i1.8332

Abstract

This study explores the controversy of SIGMA (Konsultasi Agama or Religious Consultation) at Bhasa Radio 93.1 FM Situbondo as the representation of how grassroots Muslims perceive Islamic law. SIGMA is an aired interactive forum discussing current issues of Islamic law engaging a host, a speaker, and listeners. However, it sparks controversy particularly because of the stigma of a liberalist. This research, therefore, focuses on the typology of SIGMA perspective through the opinion of its speakers, genealogy beyond their thought, and the controversy that comes along. As a qualitative field study with a socio-philosophical approach, it used interviews with 14 informants consisting of SIGMA speakers and staff as well as listeners from diverse backgrounds. It turns out that; firstly, SIGMA’s perspective indicates a progressive type of thought rather than liberal as stigmatized because of the employment of maqas{id al-syari’ah during discussing the issue and making decisions afterward. Secondly, the thinking model can be traced back historically to NU (Nahdlatul Ulama’) reformists who likely use maqas{id al-syari'ah to examine Islamic law along with a progressive mindset. SIGMA speakers furthermore tend to employ advancement of ijtihad and contextual fiqh like what bahs| al-masa'il forums typically do. Thirdly, the controversy stems mainly from the negative stigma which tends to be loudly and sporadically expressed making sympathetic voices unheard. This implies how grassroots Muslims interact with Islamic law in both textual and contextual realms particularly when coping with the changing situation and dynamic methodologies.
Konseptualisasi Siyāsah dalam Empat Mazhab Sunni: Perdebatan Yurisprudensial Klasik dan Logika Yuridis Fleksibilitas Politik Muhammad Abu Dzar; Muntaha Artalim Zaim; Muhammad Amanullah
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 11 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v11i1.16245

Abstract

This article examines siyasah in classical Sunni fiqh as a form of jurisprudential reasoning, rather than as a theory of state institutions. This study employs a normative qualitative approach using comparative fiqh analysis and contextual jurisprudential interpretation to analyze authoritative classical fiqh texts from the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali schools pertaining to governance, political authority, public policy, and legal discretion. The comparative method is used to identify patterns of similarities and differences across schools in conceptualizing the relationship between law, political authority, and the public interest, while contextual interpretation is applied to situate fiqh arguments within their historical and methodological contexts. The research findings indicate that doctrinal differences regarding political discretion reflect the plurality of legal rationalities operating within a shared normative horizon, namely justice ('adl) and the public interest (maslahah). Political flexibility in this article is conceptualized as the juristic logic of political flexibility, namely an internally structured and ethically bound legal logic, not a value-free space of political power. This article concludes that siyasah syar'iyah is an integral form of bound discretion within the Islamic legal system, offering a historical, contextual-methodological, and non-reductionist framework for contemporary studies of Islamic law and politics.
Co-Authors Abdul Hamid Achak Ahmad Azaim Ibrahimy Arif Taufiq Arlis Arlis Hossam el-Dien Ibrahim el-Safy Imam Sujoko Makmur Syarif Muhammad Abu Dzar Muhammad Amanullah Nawawi Nawawi Yasid Zulfan, Zulfan