Yudi Widagdo Harimurti
Faculty Of Law Universitas Trunojoyo

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

ANALISIS KRITIS UU NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2006 TENTANG DEWAN PERTIMBANGAN PRESIDEN Yudi Widagdo Harimurti
Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 27, No 1 (2014): Pebruari 2014
Publisher : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (51.125 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jppkn.v27i1.5516

Abstract

President as the state organizer can establish a state institution which can give the president advice, although the institution is not in the state government. The amendment of Constitution of 1945 has eliminated Supreme Advisory Council, which was the permanent state institution. In the state governance practice there is Presidential Advisory Council. This institution is not set in the Constitution of 1945 (called as non-permanent state institution). The existence of this institutionbecome problematic. It is due to the fact that non-permanent institution is the same as the permanent one.
Institutional Reconstruction of The Indonesian Ulama Council Within The Indonesian Government System Yudi Widagdo Harimurti; Safitri Safitri; Ansori Asnori
UNISKA LAW REVIEW Vol 4 No 1 (2023): Uniska Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Kadiri Islamic University (UNISKA) Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/ulr.v4i1.3468

Abstract

The Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) is an institution that houses Muslim scholars and intellectuals throughout Indonesia. Whether it is requested or not, one of the functions of The Indonesian Ulama Council is to give a legal opinion (fatwa) towards Muslims and the government. MUI fatwas provide a significant role for society and the government, it is proven by the use of the MUI fatwa as a guideline for the community in responding to daily problems related to religion. Many fatwa materials are implemented in several laws and regulations including sharia issues, narcotics, banking, waqf, pornography, and others. However, MUI Fatwas do not have the binding force of law because of its MUI position as a social organization, not a state institution. Therefore, this research was conducted to explain further the existence of MUI in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia and how MUI should be arranged in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia. This research employed a normative research method. The approach used was the statute approach and the historical approach. The results of this study indicate that MUI has an important role in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia. It is proven by the issuance MUI fatwa stated that MUI Fatwa becomes part of the legal basis for the state and becomes a referral source for the government in making decisions. Thus, a better arrangement of MUI in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia must be carried out to maintain the legal force of the MUI Fatwa involvement in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia.
PENUNDAAN PEMILIHAN UMUM DALAM PERSPEKTIF DEMOKRASI Yudi Widagdo Harimurti
RechtIdee Vol 17, No 1 (2022): June
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v17i1.14298

Abstract

In the implementation of a democratic state, the implementation of what is commonly called a General Election is needed, especially in representative government. This is because the government’s authority is only obtained with the approval of the governed (the people). Democratic elections are not just simbols, the are competitive, periodic, inclusive and definitive elections. The legality of people’s involvement in the success of democratic parties in Indonesia, as regulated by Article 22 E of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic Indonesia. This research is a normative research, using statute approach and historical approach and analysis using the deductive method. The result of this research is that general elections in Indonesia should be held regularly, continuously and temporarily, especially in a presedential system of government. The consequence is that there is no postponement of the election, considering that the country is not in state of emergency (staatsnoodrecht or noodstaatsrecht). It means that the purpose of this research is to hold elections to fill public positions, namely the President and Vice President, the People’s Representative Council (DPR) and the Regional Representative Council (DPD).
THE URGENCY OF AN EXTERNAL OVERSIGHT INSTITUTION ON THE LEGAL PRODUCTS OF THE PEOPLE'S CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY (MPR) Rofila; Yudi Widagdo Harimurti; Nurus Zaman
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v9i1a3p1r669

Abstract

The People's Consultative Assembly is a State Institution regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, has the authority to determine and amend the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, appoint and dismiss the President and Vice President, is a very large authority in running the wheels of government, there is a decree of the People's Consultative Assembly No. MPR No XI / MPR / 1998 concerning State Administrators who are clean and free from Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism, this decree invites public polemic because it contains efforts to eradicate KKN must be firmly against anyone who is wrong including President Soeharto while still paying attention to the principle of presumption of innocence and human rights, so that a conflict of interest arises in it, until now there is no external supervisory institution but an Internal supervisor, especially in legal products issued by the MPR, while great power tends to abuse power, the purpose of this study 1) to determine the position of the People's Consultative Assembly in the administration of the State in Indonesia 2) to determine the formulation of an external supervisory institution in the legal products of the People's Consultative Assembly People's Consultative Assembly, the research method used in this research is a type of normative research (Normative Legal Research), with a conceptual approach (conceptual approach), and a statute approach (statute approach), the results of this research are : 1) The position of the People's Consultative Assembly in the Indonesian constitutional system is equal to other state institutions such as the DPR, DPD, KY, MA, MK, and so on, the difference lies in the scope of power or authority held by the People's Consultative Assembly and state institutions whose members consist of the DPR and DPD which should be supervised. 2) The urgency of an External Supervisory Institution to the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) There are several fundamental reasons: The authority held by the MPR can change and determine the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, can appoint and dismiss the President and Vice President, and there has been a conflict of interest in the MPR Decree Number XI/MPR/1998 concerning State Administrators who are clean and free from Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism, so the formulation of the MPR State institution is that the Constitutional Court is the right institution to carry out external supervision of the MPR's legal products by conducting a Judicial Review because the MPR's strictness is certain regarding the provisions for changing and determining the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The purpose of this reformulation is to minimize the occurrence of abuse of authority, conflict of interest, which can harm the community and as a form of responsibility for the authority held by the MPR.