Idul Rishan
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

Batas Konstitusional Penggunaan Hak Angket terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Rishan, Idul
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (521.759 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1639

Abstract

Pasca dikeluarkannya Putusan MK Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017, penggunaan hak angket mengalami gejala ekstensifikasi subjek maupun objek. Riset ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh dua hal. Pertama, implikasi Putusan MK Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 terhadap penggunaan hak angket. Kedua, melimitasi penggunaan hak angket terhadap KPK dengan memberikan batas konstitusional. Metode riset merupakan penelitian hukum doktriner dengan basis data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan; (1) terdapat tiga implikasi penggunaan hak angket pasca Putusan MK Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017. Pertama, perubahan paradigma konseptual terhadap hak angket, kedua, perluasan pola hubungan kelembagaan, ketiga, ancaman stabilitas pemerintahan. (2) Perihal batas konstitusional penggunaan angket terhadap KPK, penulis melimitasi penggunaan angket terhadap dua bentuk. Pertama melimitasi kriteria penggunaan hak angket dan kedua, melimitasi objek penyelidikan hak angket.After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 36/PUU-XV/2017, the use of inquiry rights undergo subject and object extensification. This study focus into two discussions. First, the implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 36/PUU-XV/ 2017 towards the use of inquiry rights. Second, to give limitation of the use of inquiry rights towards the Corruption Eradication Commision (KPK). This research study is normative law research.  The results show that (1) There are three implications of the use of inquiry rights; firstly, the changing of conceptual paradigm for the inquiry rights, secondly, the extensification of the institusional relations pattern, thirdly, the threat of governance stability. (2) Regarding the constitutional limits on the use of inquiry rights, the author sets the limitation in two forms: limiting the criteria and limiting the objects of the inquiry rights.
Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi Idul Rishan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 18, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (429.04 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1811

Abstract

This study focuses on the concept of judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. There are two research objectives to be obtained. First, the reasons for the need for judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. Second, to offer the concept of judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. This doctrinal legal research uses secondary data. The results of this research show that there were three factual reasons for the need for judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. First, related to the reasons for the conception of the review. Second, the development of democracy. Third, the need for praxis. The results of this research refute the perception that judicial review of the legislative process does not have an obvious coordinate point under the constitution. Using the Rubenfeld approach, the constitution also accommodates the protection of the citizens’ constitutional rights in the due process of law-making.
Batas Konstitusional Penggunaan Hak Angket terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Idul Rishan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (521.759 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1639

Abstract

Pasca dikeluarkannya Putusan MK Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017, penggunaan hak angket mengalami gejala ekstensifikasi subjek maupun objek. Riset ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh dua hal. Pertama, implikasi Putusan MK Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 terhadap penggunaan hak angket. Kedua, melimitasi penggunaan hak angket terhadap KPK dengan memberikan batas konstitusional. Metode riset merupakan penelitian hukum doktriner dengan basis data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan; (1) terdapat tiga implikasi penggunaan hak angket pasca Putusan MK Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017. Pertama, perubahan paradigma konseptual terhadap hak angket, kedua, perluasan pola hubungan kelembagaan, ketiga, ancaman stabilitas pemerintahan. (2) Perihal batas konstitusional penggunaan angket terhadap KPK, penulis melimitasi penggunaan angket terhadap dua bentuk. Pertama melimitasi kriteria penggunaan hak angket dan kedua, melimitasi objek penyelidikan hak angket.After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 36/PUU-XV/2017, the use of inquiry rights undergo subject and object extensification. This study focus into two discussions. First, the implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 36/PUU-XV/ 2017 towards the use of inquiry rights. Second, to give limitation of the use of inquiry rights towards the Corruption Eradication Commision (KPK). This research study is normative law research.  The results show that (1) There are three implications of the use of inquiry rights; firstly, the changing of conceptual paradigm for the inquiry rights, secondly, the extensification of the institusional relations pattern, thirdly, the threat of governance stability. (2) Regarding the constitutional limits on the use of inquiry rights, the author sets the limitation in two forms: limiting the criteria and limiting the objects of the inquiry rights.
Konstitusionalitas Pembatasan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Idul Rishan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 18, No 3 (2021)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (669.558 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1833

Abstract

This research try to disscus the Constitutional Court’s interpretation of Article 28J paragraph (2) of the constitution 1945; and the reasons used by constitutional court in declaring an human right limitation unconstitutional. This research is a normative legal research conducted on 19 decisions of constitutional court which contain unconstitutional human right limitation. This research conclude 4 reasons that cause unconstitutional human right limitation, there are; a) To violate the principle of human rights respectation; b) To contain element of discrimination; c) To violate the principle of legal certain; d) Not based on the strong, valid, rational, and proportional reason, and being exessif. Those reasons are alternative, which means that constitutional court can declare an human rights limitation on legislation as the unconstitutional norm only by one from that reasons.
Autocratic Legalism: the Making of Indonesian Omnibus Law Zainal Arifin Mochtar; Idul Rishan
Yustisia Vol 11, No 1: April 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v11i1.59296

Abstract

The Indonesian House of Representatives’ approval of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation marks a significant enhancement of the business climate and a step forward for labor market flexibility, which should, over time, improve the country’s international competitiveness. But, the Constitutional Court delivered shocking news by declaring that the omnibus Job Creation Law, is partly unconstitutional on November 2021. This study aims to reveal two things. First, procedural injustice in the making of Indonesian Omnibus Law on Job Creation. Second, the root of autocratic legalism and its prevention. The study is a doctrinal legal research with qualitative analysis. It has identified that (1) five violations of procedural justice in the making of the omnibus law reflect autocratic legalism in Indonesia; and (2) three factors contribute to the phenomenon. The three contributing factors are (i) the co-optation of the ruling party in the parliament, (ii) the violations of the law and constitution, and (iii) the undermined judicial independence. Indeed, the cartelization in political parties should be ended. Therefore, citizens need to conduct strengthened collective control. In addition, the independence of the Constitutional Court should be preserved.
Redesain Sistem Pengangkatan dan Pemberhentian Hakim di Indonesia Idul Rishan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 23 No. 2: APRIL 2016
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss2.art1

Abstract

This study reviews the redesign of the appointment and dismissal of judges in Indonesia. This is a prescriptive-normative judicial research conducted using the legislation approach, historical approach, and conceptual approach. The study concluded that the redesign of the judge appointment and dismissal system can be formulated with a variety of formulations. First, it is by organizing a constitutional basis to realign the will of judicial independence and by acknowledging the existence of an independent state organ in the constitution to rearrange the complicated power relations of the Supreme Court, the Judicial Commission and the Constitutional Court. Second, it is by carrying out the merit in the judge appointment system to maintain the constellation of the checks and balances principle. After reforming the mechanism of judge appointment, then the third one is by initiating the course of judge impeachment in an integrative manner as a form of accountability of the judiciary power in the non-judicial realm.
Model dan Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial: Komparasi dengan Bulgaria, Argentina, Afrika Selatan, dan Mongolia Idul Rishan; Abel Putra
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 24 No. 3: JULI 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss3.art1

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji perbandingan model dan kewenangan judicial council di Bulgaria, Argentina, Afrika Selatan, dan Mongolia serta analisisnya terhadap Komisi Yudisial (KY) di Indonesia. Jenis penelitian ini yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan ialah pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, Pertama berdasarkan hasil komparisi di empat negara (Bulgaria, Afrika Selatan, Argentina dan Mongolia), KY di Indonesia lahir atas kecenderungan yang sama.Titik persamaan itu dapat dilihat dari adanya jaminan independensi peradilan dalam konstitusinya, pengaturan judicial council di dalam level konstitusi, faktor pendorong kelahiran yang sama, kemiripan corak kewenangan, dan kemiripan model kelembagaan serta komposisi keanggotaan yang bersifat partisan. Kedua, analisis perbandingan berhasil memetakan titik perbedaan model dan kewenangan KY dengan judicial council di empat negara. Pembedaan itu dapat diidentifikasi dari segi jumlah dan model keterwakilan golongan dalam komposisi keanggotaan KY. Selain itu, daya jelajah kewenangan KY relatif sangat kecil dan terbatas jika dibandingkan dengan judicial council yang menjadi sumber komparasi. 
Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Reformasi Peradilan Terhadap Pengelolaan Jabatan Hakim Setelah Perubahan Undang Undang Dasar 1945 Idul Rishan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 2: MEI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art3

Abstract

In most countries undergoing a political transition phase, judicial reform is one of the strategic agendas in amending the constitution. In the amendment to the Indonesian Constitution of 1945, the idea of judicial reform in the management of judges gave birth to two patterns. The first pattern guarantees judicial independency while the second pattern refers to the institutionalisation of the Judicial Commission. Each of these ideas was followed by a number of other legal policies, including the one-roof system. This study is focused on the implementation of judicial reform in the management of the magistracy after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution. It aims to provide a prescription for the implementation of the judicial reform policies. This is a normative juridical research that uses the historical, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The results conclude that the implementation of judicial reform policies are still looking for the definitive form. The significance of this phase in which interests are being pushed and pulled for nearly two decades has caused judicial reform policies tend to deviate and operate without patterns.
Risiko Koalisi Gemuk Dalam Sistem Presidensial Di Indonesia Idul Rishan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 27 No. 2: MEI 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art1

Abstract

This study focuses on the risk of a fat coalition in the presidential system in Indonesia. This research aims to obtain three things. First, the reasons for the emergence of fat coalitions in the presidential system. Second, the risks that fat coalitions pose to presidential systems. Third, offer a concept to restore executive and legislative relations. The research method is a doctrinal legal research with a secondary database. The results of the study concluded: first, three things were the reasons for the formation of the fat coalition. 1) The results of amendments to the Constitution that are inconsistent with the strengthening of the presidential system. 2) Due to extreme multiparty system. 3) Due to the weak ideological basis of the party. Second, the risks posed include, among other things, compromise, unstable, and close to authoritarian temptation. Third, this study offers the purification of the presidential system through changes to the Constitution and simplification of political parties.
Inkompatibilitas Metode Omnibus Law Dalam Penyederhanaan Regulasi Idul Rishan; Imroatun Nika
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 29 No. 1: JANUARI 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss1.art8

Abstract

This study focuses on the application of the omnibus law method in the simplification of regulations. This study aims to analyze two things. First, the application of the omnibus law method in the simplification of regulations in Indonesia. Second, formulating the reasons from which the omnibus method is not compatible in the simplification of regulations. The method used is a doctrinal legal research based on secondary data. The results of the study conclude that: (1) there are 11 regulatory clusters in the Job Creation Law with 81 affected laws and 2 repealed laws. By the time this study was completed, the omnibus law method had produced 47 Government Regulations and 4 Presidential Regulations. (2) there is no correlation between the usefulness of the omnibus law method and the efforts to simplify regulations. There are three reasons behind it, which includes: (a) the absence of regulatory normality threshold indicators (b) the omnibus method is more compatible to be used as a technique for simplifying regulations and (c) the omnibus law method creates the need for complex regulatory synchronization and has the potential to increase the volume of regulation.Key Words: Omnibus law; simplification of regulations; job creationAbstrakStudi ini difokuskan pada penerapan metode omnibus law dalam penyederhanaan regulasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dua hal. Pertama, penerapan metode omnibus law dalam penyederhanaan regulasi di Indonesia. Kedua, merumuskan alasan bahwa metode omnibus tidak kompatibel dalam menyederhanakan regulasi. Metode penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum doktriner dengan basis data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan: (1) terdapat 11 klaster pengaturan dalam UU CK dengan 81 undang-undang terdampak dan 2 undang-undang yang dicabut. Sampai dengan studi ini diselesaikan, metode omnibus law telah melahirkan 47 PP dan 4 Perpres. (2) tidak ada korelasi antara kegunaan metode omnibus dengan upaya penyederhanaan regulasi. Tiga alasan yang melatarbelakangi antara lain: (a) ketiadaan indikator ambang batas kenormalan regulasi (b) metode omnibus lebih kompatibel digunakan sebagai teknik penyederhanaan legislasi dan (c) metode omnibus law melahirkan kebutuhan sinkronisasi regulasi yang kompleks dan potensial menambah volume regulasi.Kata-kata Kunci: Omnibus law; penyederhanaan regulasi; cipta kerja