Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.989
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA DE JURE Yustisia Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurnal Konstitusi Constitutional Review Varia Justicia Undang: Jurnal Hukum Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Jurnal Konstitusi Mimbar Hukum Jurnal Jurisprudence South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance Dialogia Iuridica
Idul Rishan
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Relevansi Studi Politik Hukum Mahfud MD dalam Perkembangan dan Kontekstualisasinya Pasca Reformasi Rishan, Idul; Mochtar, Zainal Arifin
Mimbar Hukum Vol 37 No 1 (2025): Mimbar Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/mh.v37i1.20145

Abstract

Setelah Mahfud menyelesaikan disertasinya pada tahun 1993, studi politik hukum berkembang cukup pesat pada kurikulum pendidikan tinggi hukum. Pada jenjang magister dan doktor studi Mahfud mampu memberikan kontribusi yang signifikan dalam memahami relasi hukum dan politik. Studi ini bertujuan memperolah dua hal. Pertama, melihat batasan dan ruang lingkup studi politik hukum Mahfud. Kedua, menelaah relevansi studi politik hukum Mahfud MD pada pasca demokratisasi politik. Studi ini menggunakan jenis penelitian sosio legal dengan data sekunder dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil studi menunjukan (1) temuan studi ini menegaskan kembali bahwa secara metodologis studi Mahfud MD memiliki keterbatasan ruang lingkup pada wilayah hukum publik, terutama yang mengatur kepentingan pemerintah. Bahwa temuan konfigurasi politik akan berpengaruh pada karakter produk hukum, terbukti tidak berpengaruh pada wilayah hukum privat. (2) mengingat studi Mahfud diselesaikan pada tahun 1993, tentu akan berdampak pada kemampuan teori ini beradaptasi dengan kondisi sosio, hukum dan politik yang jauh berbeda pasca reformasi. Hasil temuan studi ini juga menunjukkan bahwa studi politik hukum Mahfud MD tentu masih relevan dalam konteks pedagogik. Meskipun, dalam konteks politik praktis dan bekerjanya hukum di masyarakat, studi politik hukum Mahfud MD akan nampak keterbatasannya.
The Politicizing of Judicial Independence: Cases and Controversy in Indonesian Constitutional Court’s Idul Rishan
South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance (SEAJ-ALGov) Vol 1 No 2 (2024): Public Law and The Risk of Democration Regression
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/seajalgov.v1i2.15535

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has been the target of several political attacks over the past three years, each with its tactics and goals. The politicization of the court by the government poses the greatest danger to its independence. This study combines qualitative analysis with socio-legal study methodology. According to this study, the court gets politicized in two ways. The first type is extrajudicial, which indicates that political actors acting outside the court system constitute. The second type is intra-judicial, which involves the major actors in the legal system. In this case, the major actors are the judges of the Constitutional Court. This study also elucidates the way certain components with a legal component and others with a socio-political component resulted in the politicization of the independence of the constitutional court.
Doubting the Impartiality: Constitutional Court Judges and Conflict of Interest Rishan, Idul
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 1, June 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1058

Abstract

The Constitutional Court ruling on the third amendment to the Law on the Constitutional Court is worth discussing. In the judicial review, the justices judged a case in which they have interests. The interests are related to a requirement for being a Constitutional Court justice, term of office for Constitutional Court justices, and term of office for the chief justice and deputy chief justice. Can they be impartial? This study is aimed at three things. First, analyzing their interpretation through legal annotation. Second, identifying impacts the ruling has on the Constitutional Court. Third, providing a road map for judicial review related to Constitutional Court judges. This is mixed legal research using primary and secondary data. This study has found that the judges are not impartial due to conflict of interest. They have compromised universal principles of the judiciary. For the sake of impartiality, they should not be judges in their own cause. Instead, the Supreme Court should have the authority to review legislation on them.
The Politicizing of Judicial Independence: Cases and Controversy in Indonesian Constitutional Court’s Idul Rishan
South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance (SEAJ-ALGov) Vol 1 No 2 (2024): Public Law and The Risk of Democration Regression
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/seajalgov.v1i2.15535

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has been the target of several political attacks over the past three years, each with its tactics and goals. The politicization of the court by the government poses the greatest danger to its independence. This study combines qualitative analysis with socio-legal study methodology. According to this study, the court gets politicized in two ways. The first type is extrajudicial, which indicates that political actors acting outside the court system constitute. The second type is intra-judicial, which involves the major actors in the legal system. In this case, the major actors are the judges of the Constitutional Court. This study also elucidates the way certain components with a legal component and others with a socio-political component resulted in the politicization of the independence of the constitutional court.
RELEVANSI HAK ANGKET TERHADAP KOMISI NEGARA INDEPENDEN Idul Rishan
Dialogia Iuridica Vol. 10 No. 1 (2018): Volume 10 Nomor 1 November 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28932/di.v10i1.1031

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji dua hal. Pertama, prinsip checks and balances komisi negara independen. Kedua, relevansi hak angket dengan komisi negara independen. Penelitian ini merupakan normative legal research, dengan pendekatan historis, konseptual, kasus, dan yuridis. Objek studi terhadap komisi negara independen meliputi KY,KPU, dan KPK. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, (1)Tidak ada satupun komisi negara independen yang menegasikan paham konstitusionalisme. Masing-masing komisi negara independen melaksanakan fungsi checks and balances. (2) Tidak terdapat relevansi antara hak angket dengan komisi negara independen (KY-KPU-KPK). Secara historis, konseptual, dan yuridis normatif, membuktikan bahwa komisi negara independen tidak dapat menjadi subjek hak angket.
Fast-Track Legislation: The Transformation of Law-Making Under Joko Widodo’s Administration Huda, Ni’matul; Rishan, Idul; Pratiwi, Dian Kus
Yustisia Vol 13, No 1: April 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v13i1.71061

Abstract

Since the end of 2019, the President and the House of Representatives had performed different legislative functions. Since the Law on the Commission Eradication Commission was amended, legislation had dramatically been transformed.  Several laws have been passed and amended quickly. This study discusses three legal issues. First, the conceptual limitation of fast-track legislation in Indonesia. Second, the rationale behind fast-track legislation under Joko Widodo's administration. Third, the impact of fast-track legislation under Joko Widodo's administration. In this socio-legal study, a qualitative analysis is conducted. This study has identified that (1) fast-track legislation in Indonesia can only be adopted through Perpu with all its exemptions and exceptions; (2) the transformation of law-making under Joko Widodo's administration is associated with political pragmatism, political personalization, the elimination of the opposition, and cartel parties; and (3) the transformation of law-making under Joko Widodo's administration is detrimental to the future of Indonesia's democracy. The transformation has degraded the quality of deliberation in law-making. Besides, it does not adhere to law-making procedures, resulting in elitist and conservative laws.
Autocratic Legalism: the Making of Indonesian Omnibus Law Mochtar, Zainal Arifin; Rishan, Idul
Yustisia Vol 11, No 1: April 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v11i1.59296

Abstract

The Indonesian House of Representatives’ approval of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation marks a significant enhancement of the business climate and a step forward for labor market flexibility, which should, over time, improve the country’s international competitiveness. But, the Constitutional Court delivered shocking news by declaring that the omnibus Job Creation Law, is partly unconstitutional on November 2021. This study aims to reveal two things. First, procedural injustice in the making of Indonesian Omnibus Law on Job Creation. Second, the root of autocratic legalism and its prevention. The study is a doctrinal legal research with qualitative analysis. It has identified that (1) five violations of procedural justice in the making of the omnibus law reflect autocratic legalism in Indonesia; and (2) three factors contribute to the phenomenon. The three contributing factors are (i) the co-optation of the ruling party in the parliament, (ii) the violations of the law and constitution, and (iii) the undermined judicial independence. Indeed, the cartelization in political parties should be ended. Therefore, citizens need to conduct strengthened collective control. In addition, the independence of the Constitutional Court should be preserved.
Co-Authors Abel Putra Ayu Atika Dewi Dian Kus Pratiwi Fahreza, Zumali Huda, Ni’matul Imroatun Nika Kahar, Sarifa Amina Novita Sari Pratiwi, Dian Kus Siti Ruhama Mardhatillah Sri Hastuti Puspitasari Zainal Arifin Mochtar Zainal Arifin Mochtar