Idul Rishan
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

Evaluasi Performa Legislasi dalam Pembentukan Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja: Kajian Legisprudensi Idul Rishan
Undang: Jurnal Hukum Vol 5 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/ujh.5.1.43-67

Abstract

Legisprudence is an approach to lawmaking which emphasizes theoretical and practical rationality of legislation. It is used to assess lawmaking by analyzing the accountability of its procedure, openness, and participation. This study is aimed at examining and formulating indicators of legisprudence in the national lawmaking to assess how the the Omnibus Law on Job Creation was made. According to socio-legal study, the indicators are legality, validity, participation, openness, prudence, and acceptability. However, none of them was found during the deliberation of the law. In particular, the omnibus method is not recognized under the prevailing system. It also lacks public participation and accountability. Likewise, proposed changes were approved during the deliberation process. Lastly, the law was unclear and incongruent. In its Verdict Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, the Constitutional Court declared the law conditionally unconstitutional due to procedural flaws in its formation. Based on the assessment, the principles of legisprudence should be followed in the national lawmaking. Abstrak Legisprudensi merupakan sebuah pendekatan pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan yang menitikberatkan pada rasionalitas legislasi secara teori dan praktikal. Cara kerjanya menguji proses pembentukan hukum dengan analisis akuntabilitas prosedur, keterbukaan, dan partisipasi. Artikel ini bermaksud mengkaji dan merumuskan indikator standar legisprudensi dalam pembentukan hukum nasional dan menggunakannya untuk mengevaluasi pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, suatu undang-undang yang dibentuk dengan teknik omnibus law. Dengan studi sosiolegal, artikel ini mengajukan dan menawarkan enam indikator prinsip legisprudensi dalam pembentukan hukum nasional, yaitu legalitas, validitas, partisipasi, keterbukaan, kehati-hatian, dan akseptabilitas. Pada saat digunakan untuk mengevaluasi pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, artikel ini tidak menjumpai satu pun dari keenam indikator tersebut yang terpenuhi. Hal ini antara lain ditunjukkan oleh performa legislasi yang tidak memiliki dasar hukum dalam penggunaan teknik omnibus law, tidak partisipatif dan demokratis, tidak akuntabel, adanya perubahan materi muatan di luar tahapan persetujuan, serta adanya ketidakjelasan dan ketidaksinkronan rumusan. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 yang menyatakan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja sebagai inkonstitusional bersyarat, sesungguhnya telah mengonfirmasi sekaligus menjustifikasi adanya pelanggaran asas dan prosedur dalam pembentukannya. Dengan evaluasi performa legislasi yang demikian itu, maka artikel ini mendorong penting untuk diadaptasi dan digunakannya prinsip legisprudensi dalam pembentukan hukum nasional.
RELEVANSI HAK ANGKET TERHADAP KOMISI NEGARA INDEPENDEN Idul Rishan
Dialogia Iuridica Vol. 10 No. 1 (2018): Volume 10 Nomor 1 November 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (394.619 KB) | DOI: 10.28932/di.v10i1.1031

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji dua hal. Pertama, prinsip checks and balances komisi negara independen. Kedua, relevansi hak angket dengan komisi negara independen. Penelitian ini merupakan normative legal research, dengan pendekatan historis, konseptual, kasus, dan yuridis. Objek studi terhadap komisi negara independen meliputi KY,KPU, dan KPK. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, (1)Tidak ada satupun komisi negara independen yang menegasikan paham konstitusionalisme. Masing-masing komisi negara independen melaksanakan fungsi checks and balances. (2) Tidak terdapat relevansi antara hak angket dengan komisi negara independen (KY-KPU-KPK). Secara historis, konseptual, dan yuridis normatif, membuktikan bahwa komisi negara independen tidak dapat menjadi subjek hak angket.
Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi Idul Rishan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (429.04 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1811

Abstract

This study focuses on the concept of judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. There are two research objectives to be obtained. First, the reasons for the need for judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. Second, to offer the concept of judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. This doctrinal legal research uses secondary data. The results of this research show that there were three factual reasons for the need for judicial review of the legislative process in the Constitutional Court. First, related to the reasons for the conception of the review. Second, the development of democracy. Third, the need for praxis. The results of this research refute the perception that judicial review of the legislative process does not have an obvious coordinate point under the constitution. Using the Rubenfeld approach, the constitution also accommodates the protection of the citizens’ constitutional rights in the due process of law-making.
Amendment to Term of Office of Constitutional Court Judges in Indonesia: Reasons, Implications, and Improvement Idul Rishan; Sri Hastuti Puspitasari; Siti Ruhama Mardhatillah
Varia Justicia Vol 18 No 2 (2022): Vol 18 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/variajusticia.v18i2.7236

Abstract

After the amendment to the Constitutional Court Law, constitutional court judges would be dismissed honorably when they attain the age of 70 (seventy) years old. Problem arises, where the transitional provisions of the third amendment to the Constitutional Court Law are not applicable prospectively but retroactively. Hence, the implementation of the amendment to the term of office of constitutional court judges also brings an impact on the incumbent constitutional judges in the Constitutional Court. This study had three objectives. First, to identify the underlying reasons (ratio-legis) for the amendment to the term of office of constitutional court judges to the maximum age limit of 70 years. Second, to analyze the implications of arranging a maximum age limit of 70 years for the position of constitutional court judges. Third, to recommend alternative arrangements for the term of office of constitutional court judges in Indonesia. This was a legal doctrinal research with a qualitative analysis. The results showed that (1) the reasons for the amendment to the term of office of constitutional court judges are due to the open legal policy, globalization and efforts to build the pro-majoritarian power in the Constitutional Court. (2) This amendment brings implications, i.e., the distortion of judicial independence, conflicts of interest and a declined public trust. (3) Improvements can be made by revising the transitional provisions and trying other alternatives by arranging the term of office of the judges through the constitution.
Indonesian Judicial Commission in Appointment Ad Hoc Judges: In Search of Constitutional Modality Zainal Arifin Mochtar; Idul Rishan; Ayu Atika Dewi
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 14, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v14i2.17843

Abstract

In Indonesian Constitution, Judicial Commission had the authority to nominate the candidate Supreme Court Justice. This study aims to find the constitutional model for the authority of the Judicial Commission to propose the appointment of the Supreme Court ad hoc judges. It is doctrinal legal research using the qualitative analysis. The constitutional model was analyzed using the approach of six modalities of constitutional argument suggested by Philipp Bobbit. This study has found that, despite no explicit authority stipulated in the Indonesian Constitution, Bobbit's interpretation methods offer a constitutional perspective that from the textual, historical, doctrinal, structural, prudential, and ethical arguments, the Judicial Commission has the constitutional legitimacy of proposing the candidates for the Supreme Court ad hoc judges.
Guarding the Political Assembly : The Reasons and Assesing Impeachment Clause in Indonesia Idul Rishan; Dian Kus Pratiwi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i01.p04

Abstract

In deliberative democracy, a constitution provides formal procedures for discharging the president and/or vice president during his/her term of office This research aims to reveal two things. First, the reasons why discharging the president or vice president during his/her term of office is more political than legal. Second, assessment of provisions on discharging the president and/or vice president during his/her term of office. This is a doctrinal legal research using secondary data, and analyzed by the method of statutory approach, historical method, and conceptual method. This study has found that the political forum in MPR cannnot be separated from the presidential system, characterized by political and government stability. Therefore, bipartisan decision making in MPR needs strengthening. However, DPR has unwittingly acted as prosecutors as well as justices at the MPR level. In addition, the provisions of Articles 7A-8 of the constitution should be stipulated further.
Indonesian Judicial Commission in Appointment Ad Hoc Judges: In Search of Constitutional Modality Zainal Arifin Mochtar; Idul Rishan; Ayu Atika Dewi
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 14, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Shariah Faculty UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v14i2.17843

Abstract

In Indonesian Constitution, Judicial Commission had the authority to nominate the candidate Supreme Court Justice. This study aims to find the constitutional model for the authority of the Judicial Commission to propose the appointment of the Supreme Court ad hoc judges. It is doctrinal legal research using the qualitative analysis. The constitutional model was analyzed using the approach of six modalities of constitutional argument suggested by Philipp Bobbit. This study has found that, despite no explicit authority stipulated in the Indonesian Constitution, Bobbit's interpretation methods offer a constitutional perspective that from the textual, historical, doctrinal, structural, prudential, and ethical arguments, the Judicial Commission has the constitutional legitimacy of proposing the candidates for the Supreme Court ad hoc judges.
Fast-Track Legislation: The Transformation of Law-Making Under Joko Widodo’s Administration Ni’matul Huda; Idul Rishan; Dian Kus Pratiwi
Yustisia Vol 13, No 1: April 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v13i1.71061

Abstract

Since the end of 2019, the President and the House of Representatives had performed different legislative functions. Since the Law on the Commission Eradication Commission was amended, legislation had dramatically been transformed.  Several laws have been passed and amended quickly. This study discusses three legal issues. First, the conceptual limitation of fast-track legislation in Indonesia. Second, the rationale behind fast-track legislation under Joko Widodo's administration. Third, the impact of fast-track legislation under Joko Widodo's administration. In this socio-legal study, a qualitative analysis is conducted. This study has identified that (1) fast-track legislation in Indonesia can only be adopted through Perpu with all its exemptions and exceptions; (2) the transformation of law-making under Joko Widodo's administration is associated with political pragmatism, political personalization, the elimination of the opposition, and cartel parties; and (3) the transformation of law-making under Joko Widodo's administration is detrimental to the future of Indonesia's democracy. The transformation has degraded the quality of deliberation in law-making. Besides, it does not adhere to law-making procedures, resulting in elitist and conservative laws.
Constitutional Court Regression in Post- Democratic Transition: A Comparison of Court Packing in Hungary, Poland, and Indonesia Idul Rishan
Constitutional Review Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/consrev1026

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the constitutional court established in the post-democratic transition has begun to face regression. The Constitutional Courts in Hungary, Poland, and Indonesia have evidence, carried out intensively through court packing. This article investigates the regime’s undermining of the constitutional court against constitutional judges in selected countries. In addition, this article will also describe the regime’s motives and objectives in undermining the independence of the constitutional court. This study argues that regression of the constitutional court occurs through several patterns, such as increasing and decreasing the number of constitutional judges, politicizing the appointment and dismissal of constitutional judges, and rearranging the requirements and selection procedures of constitutional judges. The regime uses court packing to place judges who are loyal or have the same political preferences as the regime to provide control over their independence.
Legal Review of the Use of Smart Contracts in Cyber Notary Services with Blockchain Security Based on the Perspective of UUJN and UU ITE Sari, Novita; Kahar, Sarifa Amina; Fahreza, Zumali; Rishan, Idul
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 6, No 4 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Program Studi Master of Notary Law (S2), Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.v6i4.42417

Abstract

This study examines the application of smart contracts in cyber notary services in Indonesia that use blockchain security and then conducts an in-depth analysis of regulations that accommodate their relationship with UUJN and UU ITE. The concept of smart contracts is based on the need for fast, cheap, objective, real-time and online exchange of goods and services, so that it is widely used in electronic transactions. Basically, electronic contracts are the same as contracts in general, the only difference is that electronic contracts are made through an electronic system while conventional contracts are made directly in oral or written form, as well as smart contracts that are present through an electronic program in the field of contracts based on the principle of freedom of contract regulated in the third book of the Civil Code, and Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions or the ITE Law, in addition to its implementation regulated in Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions or PP PSTE and Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 concerning Trade through electronic systems hereinafter referred to as PP PMSE. Smart Contract technology with blockchain security is undeniably used in the notary profession, where the notary's authority is stated in Article 15 of the Notary Law that the notary is authorized to make authentic deeds, but there are problems in implementing smart contracts in making authentic deeds with blockchain security, namely in the legal certainty regarding the validity and strength of the authentic deed. So that regulations are needed that regulate the application of smart contracts in making authentic deeds with blockchain security in cyber notary services and adequate technology and regulations are needed to support this smart contract service.