Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat
Sirojuddin Aly
UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Paradigma Pemilihan Kepala Negara di Zaman Khulafa Al-Rasyidin Sirojuddin Aly
Refleksi Vol 7, No 2 (2005): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v7i2.25821

Abstract

Dalam khazanah Ilmu Politik banyak model pemilihan pemimpin sebuah pemerintahan. Ada yang melalui proses pemilihan langsung, ada juga melalui perwakilan. Di dalam Islam model pemilihan juga beragam. Keragaman pemilihan tersebut berlangsung pasca Rasulullah saw. wafat, yaitu sejak masa Khalafa al-Rasyidin. Hal ini terjadi karena di dalam al-Qur’an maupun hadis tidak ada keterangan yang secara tegas dan detail membincangkan proses pemilihan kepala negara. Tulisan ini mengulas paradigma pemilihan pemimpin pada masa Khalafa al-Rasyidin. Ia mencoba mengulas sistem pemilihan terhadap empat khalifah, yaitu Abu Bakar, Umar, Utsman, dan Ali yang menurut penulis memiliki perbedaan satu dengan lainnya. Lebih jauh tulisan ini juga mengupas secara komparatif beberapa sistem politik modern dengan konsepsi yang ditawarkan oleh Islam.
Demokrasi di Negara Muslim: Akomodasi Unsur-unsur Kesamaan Sirojuddin Aly
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 9, No 3 (2007): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v9i3.37533

Abstract

This writing attempts to uncover the common ground between the West and Islam in one concept that each possesses, democracy and shura. Both are different concepts of statehood, as democracy comes from the Western tradition that has become an ideology whose values are relative as it is not based on revelation. The main characteristic of democracy is decisions supported by the majority vote. On the other hand, shura is derived from revelation (the Qur'an and hadith), so its values are absolute (as long as it concerns principles). The common ground between the two lies in their emphasis on consultation in resolving matters that involve the public.
Paradigma Pemilihan Kepala Negara di Zaman Khulafa Al-Rasyidin Sirojuddin Aly
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 7, No 2 (2005): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v7i2.25821

Abstract

In the realm of Political Science, there are various models for selecting leaders of a government. Some involve direct elections, while others rely on representation. Similarly, within Islam, there is diversity in the models of leadership selection. This diversity emerged after the passing of Prophet Muhammad, particularly during the era of the Rashidun Caliphs. This occurred because neither the Quran nor the Hadith provide explicit and detailed instructions regarding the process of selecting a head of state. This article examines the paradigm of leadership selection during the era of the Rashidun Caliphs. It delves into the selection systems for the four caliphs: Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali, each of whom, according to the author, had distinct differences. Furthermore, the article provides a comparative analysis between several modern political systems and the concepts espoused by Islam.
Paradigma Pemilihan Kepala Negara di Zaman Khulafa Al-Rasyidin Aly, Sirojuddin
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 7 No. 2 (2005): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v7i2.25821

Abstract

In the realm of Political Science, there are various models for selecting leaders of a government. Some involve direct elections, while others rely on representation. Similarly, within Islam, there is diversity in the models of leadership selection. This diversity emerged after the passing of Prophet Muhammad, particularly during the era of the Rashidun Caliphs. This occurred because neither the Quran nor the Hadith provide explicit and detailed instructions regarding the process of selecting a head of state. This article examines the paradigm of leadership selection during the era of the Rashidun Caliphs. It delves into the selection systems for the four caliphs: Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali, each of whom, according to the author, had distinct differences. Furthermore, the article provides a comparative analysis between several modern political systems and the concepts espoused by Islam.
Demokrasi di Negara Muslim: Akomodasi Unsur-unsur Kesamaan Aly, Sirojuddin
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 9 No. 3 (2007): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v9i3.37533

Abstract

This writing attempts to uncover the common ground between the West and Islam in one concept that each possesses, democracy and shura. Both are different concepts of statehood, as democracy comes from the Western tradition that has become an ideology whose values are relative as it is not based on revelation. The main characteristic of democracy is decisions supported by the majority vote. On the other hand, shura is derived from revelation (the Qur'an and hadith), so its values are absolute (as long as it concerns principles). The common ground between the two lies in their emphasis on consultation in resolving matters that involve the public.
Konstruksi Tatanan Dasar Politik dalam Islam Aly, Sirojuddin
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 8 No. 1 (2006): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v8i1.37653

Abstract

In societal and governmental life, from ancient times to the present, there has been a need for a set of regulations, whether derived directly from religious teachings or through contemporary decisions based on current needs, whether these regulations have been codified in writing or not, whether they are fundamental (constitutional laws) or developments. With these regulations in place, societal and governmental life becomes orderly and organized. Conversely, without a set of regulations, societal life would undoubtedly become chaotic, disorderly, and would inevitably lead to a law of the jungle. In this context, the author attempts to propose some basic principles for the purpose of governing societal and state life from the perspective of Islamic political thought, including the principles of consultation, equality, freedom, upholding justice, and so forth. These principles are indeed universal values, wherein civilized nations in societal and governmental life also apply these principles, albeit with different interpretations and implementations.
Hastag War on Social Media: Unraveling Framing Strategies in the Duel #2019GantiPresiden Vs. #DiaSibukKerja Nawiruddin; Sirojuddin Aly; Agus Nugraha; Siska Armawati Sufa; M. Wiranata Pratama
RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Linguistik Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jr.10.1.2024.228-247

Abstract

Social media has emerged as the primary avenue for individuals to articulate their political and social stances. Hashtag wars, a prevalent phenomenon, witness divergent groups utilizing hashtags to promote their agendas and express viewpoints. Within the political realm, these hashtag battles often serve as arenas for discourse and mass mobilization. This study aimed to unveil the framing strategies employed in the hashtag war between #2019GantiPresiden and #DiaSibukKerja on social media. Utilizing a content analysis approach, the research scrutinizes hashtag usage, conveyed messages, and user responses. Various framing techniques, including episodic and thematic framing, alongside positive and negative framing, are analyzed. Moreover, the research explores the influence of social media usage and user interactions on the dissemination of political messages during hashtag wars. Findings indicate the dominance of #2019GantiPresiden in the social media hashtag war. The framing strategies and political discourse of both hashtags serve distinct purposes. #2019GantiPresiden utilizes sentiment-driven or provocative language to highlight dissatisfaction with Jokowi's leadership, while #DiaSibukKerja underscores Jokowi's achievements, emphasizing stability and success. In terms of hashtag impact, #2019GantiPresiden effectively influences public opinion and garners widespread support. Conversely, #DiaSibukKerja succeeds in portraying Jokowi's leadership positively. The practical implications of this research can aid stakeholders in politics and social media to comprehend effective framing techniques for disseminating political messages through digital platforms.
Co-Authors Agus Nugraha M. Wiranata Pratama Nawiruddin Siska Armawati Sufa