Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.399
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) The Southeast Asia Law Journal International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Pancasila and Law Review Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS (INJOSER) Asian Journal of Social and Humanities International Journal of Law and Society JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Lilik Mulyadi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Energy Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Perlindungan Hukum Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organized Crime di Indonesia Masa Mendatang Mulyadi, Lilik
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (743.191 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakTulisan ini mengkaji lebih detail model ideal perlindungan hukum Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam upaya penanggulangan organized crime di Indonesia untuk masa yang akan datang (ius constituendum). Model ideal perlindungan hukum bagi Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator ini harus berorientasi kepada model hak-hak prosedural, partisipasi langsung, atau aktif. Model ideal ini juga berbentuk model pelayanan atau model partisipasi tidak langsung atau model pastif (the service model), model persuasif atau partisipasi, model perlindungan komprehensif, model penjatuhan pidana bersyarat dan model perlindungan melalui teleconference.Kata kunci: justice collaborator, perlindungan hukum, organized crime, whistleblower, hak-hak prosedural. Legal Protection of Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator to Eradicate Organized Crime in IndonesiaAbstractThis paper examines the ideal model of legal protection of Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator to eradicate organized crime in the future Indonesia (ius constituendum). The proposed ideal models shall refer to procedural rights model, direct or active participation model. The other ideal models are: services model; persuasive or participatory model; comprehensive protection model; criminal punishment model; and teleconference based model.Keywords: justice collaborator, legal protections, organized crime, whistleblower, procedural rights.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n3.a9
Perlindungan Hukum Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organized Crime di Indonesia Masa Mendatang Lilik Mulyadi
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (743.191 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakTulisan ini mengkaji lebih detail model ideal perlindungan hukum Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam upaya penanggulangan organized crime di Indonesia untuk masa yang akan datang (ius constituendum). Model ideal perlindungan hukum bagi Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator ini harus berorientasi kepada model hak-hak prosedural, partisipasi langsung, atau aktif. Model ideal ini juga berbentuk model pelayanan atau model partisipasi tidak langsung atau model pastif (the service model), model persuasif atau partisipasi, model perlindungan komprehensif, model penjatuhan pidana bersyarat dan model perlindungan melalui teleconference.Kata kunci: justice collaborator, perlindungan hukum, organized crime, whistleblower, hak-hak prosedural. Legal Protection of Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator to Eradicate Organized Crime in IndonesiaAbstractThis paper examines the ideal model of legal protection of Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator to eradicate organized crime in the future Indonesia (ius constituendum). The proposed ideal models shall refer to procedural rights model, direct or active participation model. The other ideal models are: services model; persuasive or participatory model; comprehensive protection model; criminal punishment model; and teleconference based model.Keywords: justice collaborator, legal protections, organized crime, whistleblower, procedural rights.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n3.a9
The Shifting of Burden of Proof on Corruption Offences in Indonesia After The Ratification of United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003 Lilik Mulyadi; . Ismail
The Southeast Asia Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Postgraduate of Jayabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (558.527 KB) | DOI: 10.31479/salj.v2i1.77

Abstract

This article describes the result  of a research  regarding  the shifting of burden  of proof  on corrup-  tion offenses in the Indonesia after the ratification of United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003. T he article uses normative research which regulation, conceptual, case and compar- ative approach. Such research emphasizes interpretation and legal construction to obtain some legal norms, conception, regulation list and its implementation in concerto cases. Regulation  and concep-  tual approach to used how to know, existences, consistency and harmonization regarding the shifting of burden of proof upon corruption offenses in legislation body. The cases approach uses comparative law regarding the reversal burden of proof upon corruption offender between Indonesia and the other countries. This research shows that the shifting of burden of proof has never yet applied for in the corruption cases Indonesia. The Indonesian corruption regulation policy, especially  article 12B, 37, 37A, 38B apparently it’s not cleaq and disharmony to norm of sudden charge of fortune the shifting of burden of proof formulation in connection with United Nations Convention Against Corruption 2003 (KAK 2003). So, necessary (needs) of modification sudden charge of fortune shifting of burden of proof formulation which preventive, represive and restorative characteristic.Keywords: Corruption; The Shifting of Burden of Proof; Balanced Probability of Principles         
PELAKSANAAN REHABILITASI TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA JENIS BARU DI POLDA DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA Endang Sulistyandini; Lilik Mulyadi; JS Murdomo
Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Janabadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (551.191 KB) | DOI: 10.37159/jmih.v2i1.578

Abstract

PELAKSANAAN REHABILITASI TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA JENIS BARU DI POLDA DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA
ASAS STRICT LIABILITY DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA Fajar Yudi Ariyanto; Lilik Mulyadi; Sigit Setyadi
Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Janabadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (540.882 KB) | DOI: 10.37159/jmih.v2i1.568

Abstract

The study aims to examine and analyze: the strict liability principle in the criminal justice system in Indonesia and the ideal concept of strict liability principle in the Criminal Justice System. This type of research is normative research. This study uses secondary data. Data collection was done by document study and interview. Data analysis in this research is qualitative. Based on the result of the research, it is concluded that, Arrangement of strict liability principle in Criminal Justice System in Indonesia one of them can be seen in KUHP and outside KUHP. The Criminal Code does not explicitly mention the system of criminal liability held. Several articles of the Criminal Code only mention errors of intent or negligence. Outside of the Indonesian Criminal Code, the setting of strict liability principles in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System can be seen among others in the Environmental Law and Narcotics Act and the ideal concept of strict liability principle in the Criminal Justice System is explicitly affirmed in positive law, as defined in Article 35 Paragraph 2 The new Draft Penal Code, whose formula is: For certain criminal acts, the law may determine that a person may be criminally solely because of the fulfillment of the elements of the crime without regard to any errors. 
ILLICIT ENRICHMENT AND PANCASILA: SYNERGY FOR A JUST CRIMINAL LAW REFORM Eldi Nasali; Muhammad Mustofa; Lilik Mulyadi
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS Vol. 2 No. 8 (2024): AUGUST
Publisher : Adisam Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Corruption has been proven to weaken democracy, hinder access to justice, and undermine fairness and equality in society. Despite efforts to combat corruption, the global Corruption Perception Index (CPI) remains concerningly low, with Indonesia's CPI score stagnating at 34. A significant challenge in Indonesia's fight against corruption is the lack of criminalization of specific corrupt practices, such as illicit enrichment. Illicit enrichment, defined under Article 20 of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), involves the significant increase in the assets of a public official that cannot be reasonably explained by lawful income. This research explores the harmonization of Pancasila principles with the formulation of illicit enrichment offenses to strengthen Indonesia's anti-corruption framework. This research utilizes normative legal methods by adopting statutory, conceptual, comparative, approaches. The nature of this research is descriptive-prescriptive. The data that has been collected is analyzed using the content analysis method. The analysis reveals that Indonesia's stagnation in the CPI score reflects deep-rooted systemic issues, including inadequate enforcement of anti-corruption laws and lack of transparency. The absence of specific legal provisions targeting illicit enrichment allows corrupt officials to amass unexplained wealth without facing legal repercussions. Aligning anti-corruption measures with Pancasila principles, such as justice, humanity, unity, democracy, and social justice, is essential. These principles support the need for stringent asset declaration regulations, transparency, and accountability. Criminalizing illicit enrichment would enhance legal frameworks, close loopholes, and promote integrity in public service. By integrating Pancasila values into anti-corruption legislation, Indonesia can create a more just, transparent, and equitable society.
Reflecting Pancasila in Environmental Crimes Enforcement: Diffusing Values to Indonesia’s Laws Arief, Syamsul; Hasibuan, Fauzie Yusuf; Mulyadi, Lilik
Pancasila and Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/plr.v5i1.3457

Abstract

Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution play crucial roles in shaping Indonesia's governance, societal values, and legal framework, particularly in safeguarding the right to a clean and healthy environment. However, environmental destruction persists due to inadequate corporate accountability enforcement and systemic flaws. Hence, the article examines Indonesia's regulatory approach to holding corporations accountable for environmental crimes through the lens of Pancasila. It explores how Pancasila's principles influence environmental regulations, emphasizing nature harmony, fair treatment, and social justice. Effective enforcement aligned with these principles can promote sustainable development and environmental protection. Challenges like regulatory gaps and corruption need addressing. Building an optimal framework entails integrating Pancasila values into preventive and punitive measures, ensuring transparency, community participation, and fair enforcement. Success hinges on robust legal structures and public involvement, with initiatives like corporate collaboration, transparency, and strict liability enforcement. Implementation requires the establishment of mechanisms such as an Environmental Court and community oversight for victim recovery. This article uses a normative approach elaborated through a conceptual and statute approach.
Integration of Legal Certainty and Restorative Justice in the Phases of General Criminal Investigation : An Examination of Law Enforcement by the Indonesian National Police Johan Rofi; Fauzie Yusuf Hasibuan; Lilik Mulyadi
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i2.346

Abstract

This research aims to elucidate the significance of restorative justice during the investigative phase and the legal assurance for investigators who apply restorative justice in cases of party noncompliance with the agreement. The author employs normative legal research, which involves the collection and analysis of legal documents pertinent to the subject at hand. This legal research employs the statute and case approaches. This writing employs primary and secondary legal materials. This article conducts prescriptive research. The findings of this research indicate that, initially, the concept of restorative justice during the investigative phase prioritizes substantive justice over procedural justice. We seek to establish substantive justice as the cornerstone of our rule of law, as it presents a promising opportunity for enhancing national well-being. The rule of law in Indonesia ought to foster the well-being of its citizens, and for this purpose, the notion of restorative justice, synonymous with substantive justice, is selected. Secondly, investigators lack legal clarity while implementing restorative justice if the participating parties violate the agreement. It may evolve into a complex issue when investigators seek to address broad criminal charges via restorative justice. The restorative justice concept is not acknowledged in general criminal offenses, although being governed by the Police Chief Regulation. Nonetheless, it is perceived that it still fails to offer legal certainty to investigators in the event of a future breach of contract or if the reported party defaults on their commitment or repeats their conduct.
Corporate Criminal Liability Formulation in Criminal Acts in the Field of Taxation to Realize Legal Certainty Rekso Wibowo, Basuki; Handoyo Lugito, Hendrik; Mulyadi, Lilik
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v3i1.435

Abstract

Problems in the enforcement of tax criminal law involve normative vagueness related to corporate criminal liability in the context of tax crimes. Currently, criminal liability is directed only to individuals who are stewards or controllers of the corporation personally. This results in the main perpetrator in tax crimes are individual taxpayers, even though these crimes actually occur within the scope of operations of a corporation. In addition, the corporation itself cannot be criminally liable, nor can its shareholders. In the context of tax crimes that generally occur in a corporative environment and involve tax officials, there are normative obstacles in law enforcement against business entities involved in tax crimes. The research method used in this study is normative juridical with research specifications, namely descriptive analytical, techniques for collecting legal materials with library research using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, analytical techniques used qualitative normative by combining induction and deduction reasoning. The results of this Dissertation research show that criminal liability for corporations in tax crimes regulated in Law No. 16 of 2009 concerning General Provisions and Tax Procedures which has been amended by Law No. 7 of 2021 concerning Harmonization of Tax Regulations, has not directly regulated criminal liability for corporations. Currently, criminal liability is only given to the management or controller of the corporation personally.
Reconstruction of Intersection the Customary Court and State Criminal Court for Indigenous Communities in Papua Suhariyanto, Budi; Mulyadi, Lilik; Afandi, Fachrizal; Muhammad S.R.P., Sri Gilang
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Reforming Legal Frameworks: Justice, Rights, and Innovation in Indonesia and Be
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v9i2.19155

Abstract

The Law on Special Autonomy for Papua Province grants the Customary Court the authority to adjudicate criminal cases involving indigenous Papuans. Parties dissatisfied with the decisions of the Customary Court may appeal to the State Court. However, conflicts arise when the formal criminal justice system intervenes before the customary resolution process is completed, creating jurisdictional clashes. This raises the question of how to harmonize the relationship between these two judicial systems in a manner that fosters accommodation rather than resistance. This study employs both document analysis and field research, including interviews with law enforcement officials, judges, academics, and traditional leaders in Jayapura and Manokwari. The findings reveal that the intersection between the Customary Court and the State Court is inevitable, as the subject matter, object, and principles of criminal responsibility overlap between the two systems. To mitigate conflicts, a reconstruction of the interaction between Customary Courts and State Courts is essential, particularly in the adjudication of criminal cases involving customary law communities. Key strategies include fostering synergy and aligning perceptions between the apparatus of the Customary and State Courts. Additionally, the development of comprehensive guidelines for handling customary crime cases is crucial. Such guidelines would provide judges operating within Papua’s jurisdiction with a clear framework for considering customary law, thereby promoting integration and mutual respect between the two judicial systems. This approach aims to ensure that both customary and state legal traditions coexist harmoniously within the context of Papua’s special autonomy.
Co-Authors Arief, Syamsul Baktiana, Nur Sari Budi Suhariyanto, Budi Eldi Nasali Endang Sulistyandini Fachrizal Afandi Fajar Yudi Ariyanto Fauzie Yusuf Hasibuan Handoyo Lugito, Hendrik Hasibuan, Fauzie Yusuf Hasibuan, Fauzie Yususf Ismail Ismail Jeremia Sipahutar Johan Rofi JS Murdomo Matdung, Chandra Muhammad Mustofa Muhammad S.R.P., Sri Gilang Prija Djatmika Rekso Wibowo, Basuki Sigit Setyadi