Articles
<![CDATA[SUBSTANSI HUKUM KEKABURAN NORMA PADA PERALIHAN HAK CIPTA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ngurah Indradewi, Anak Agung Sagung]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Vol 8, No 3 (2020): September, Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23887/jpku.v8i3.28603
<![CDATA[Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014tentang Hak Cipta pada pasal 16 ayat 2 huruf f menyatakan Hak Cipta dapat beralih atau dialihkan, baik seluruh maupun sebagian karena sebab lain yang dibenarkan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Makna pada frasa “karena sebab lain’’ tersebut menimbulkan kekaburan norma (vague norm) yang berakibat pada timbulnya ketidakpastian hukum terhadap pengaturan pasal tersebut. Tujuan penelitian untuk memperjelas makna frasa “karena sebab lain’’ pada Pasal 16 huruf f . Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan yaitu penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian yakni bahwa dapat disebut mengandung tafsir suatu norma yang kabur dalam hal ini diperkuat dengan tidak adanya suatu penjelasan yang signifikan dan atau suatu penjelasan yang lugas dan terarah untuk menjelaskan suatu makna “karena sebab lain’’ pada Bab Penjelasan didalam Pasal 16 huruf f Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Bahwa semestinya wajib secara spesifik menjelaskan khususnya pada frasa “karena sebab lain’’ agar tidak menimbulkan kebingungan apa yang dimaksud dengan “karena sebab lain’’ pada pengaturan pasal 16huruf f tersebut. Kesimpulan yakni makna pada frasa “karena sebab lain’’ tersebut dapat menimbulkan kekaburan norma (vague norm) yang berakibat pada timbulnya ketidakpastian hukum terhadap pengaturan pasal 16huruf f tersebut. Rekomendasi maka diperlukannya suatu revisi terhadap pengaturan Pasal 16 huruf f Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta khususnya pada Bab Penjelasan pasal 16 tersebut.]]>
<![CDATA[LEGAL REGULATIONS COPYRIGHT TRANSITION AT PERSPECTIVE IUS CONSTITUENDUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Ngurah Indradewi, Anak Agung Sagung]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Februari, Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23887/jpku.v9i1.32725
<![CDATA[Pencabutan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2002 tentang Hak Cipta atas lahirnya undang-undang hak cipta yang baru yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dengan sendirinya akan membawa perubahan mendasar pada pengaturan hak cipta di Indonesia. Salah satunya dalam ketentuan Pasal 16 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta, disebutkan bahwa Hak Cipta dapat dialihkan atau dialihkan, baik seluruhnya maupun sebagian karena: a. warisan; b. hibah; c. wakaf; d. akan; e. kesepakatan tertulis; atau f. alasan lain yang dibenarkan sesuai dengan ketentuan perundang-undangan. Secara khusus dalam ketentuan Pasal 16 ayat (2) huruf f Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta disebutkan bahwa “alasan lain yang dapat dibenarkan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undanganâ€. Pengertian frasa '' karena alasan lain '' menimbulkan multitafsir asalkan dibenarkan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan, sehingga perlu dipertanyakan peraturan perundang-undangan mana yang dijadikan tolok ukur agar frasa terkait hak cipta dapat menjadi acuan. dialihkan atau dialihkan, baik seluruhnya maupun sebagian karena alasan lain yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Substansi asli pasal 16 ayat (2) huruf f Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta yang menyebutkan hak cipta dapat dialihkan atau dialihkan, baik seluruhnya maupun sebagian karena alasan lain yang dibenarkan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan, dalam hal ini kasus yang menyebabkan norma kabur (vague norm) yang berakibat pada munculnya ketidakpastian hukum tentang regulasi pasal tersebut.]]>
<![CDATA[PENGATURAN PENDAFTARAN PENDIRIAN CV BERDASARKAN KUHD DAN PERATURAN MENTERI HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2018 ]]>
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Kompiang Gede]]>;
<![CDATA[A.A.Sagung Ngurah Indradewi]]>
<![CDATA[ Kerta Dyatmika Vol 18 No (1) (2021): Kerta Dyatmika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dwijendra ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46650/kd.18.(1).1065.56-67
<![CDATA[This research is motivated by the existence of conflicting norms about the registration arrangements for the establishment of Commanditaire Vennotschap (CV). According Article 23 of the Commercial Law Code, the deed of establishment of the Vennotschap Commanditaire (CV) and Article 3 of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 17 of 2018. The problem studied is: (1) How do the registration arrangements for the establishment of a CV be reviewed from the KUHD and Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 of 2018 ?. (2) What are the legal consequences if the provisions of Article 3 of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 17 of 2018 are not implemented in the process of establishing a CV?. The type of research used is normative legal research using a statutory approach and an analytical conceptual approach. Based on the results of the study it can be seen that: (1) CV establishment registration arrangements in terms of the KUHD and Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 of 2018 according to norm conflicts between the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 17 of 2018 with the KUHD, it is necessary to review the position of each of these laws and regulations. In a hierarchical regulation, the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 17 of 2018 has a lower position than the KUHD. The legal consequence is that the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 17 Year 2018 cannot rule out the KUHD, so the obligations / arrangements contained in the KUHD for the sake of law must be considered to remain valid. (2). Legal consequences if the CV does not implement the provisions of Article 3 of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 17 of 2018 is that there are no legal consequences in the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 17 of 2018. This can prove that the regulation cannot provide legal certainty for the community.]]>
<![CDATA[Efektifitas Penerapan Sanksi Administrasi Terhadap Warga Negara Asing Yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Visa Di Bali ]]>
<![CDATA[Ngurah Indradewi, Anak Agung Sagung]]>;
<![CDATA[Istri Vera Arifiani, Anak Agung]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2021): Agustus, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23887/jkh.v7i2.38837
<![CDATA[The problem of international migration at this time has become a problem for every country, be it country of origin, country of destination or country of transit. Several government policies related to granting visas to foreign nationals are expected to encourage the number of foreign arrivals to Indonesia. However, the existence of these policies has resulted in an increase in the number of immigration violations in Indonesia. The main problems in research on Immigration administrative sanctions against foreigners in Indonesia in terms of Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration are: How effective is the implementation of administrative sanctions against visa violators by foreign nationals and How are the efforts of immigration officers in preventing visa violations by foreign nationals? foreign nationals in Bali. The research method that the author uses is an empirical type with the aim of the studybeing to see the effectiveness of administrative sanctions against foreign nationals who violate visas in Bali. The theories used are Legal Certainty Theory, Legal Effectiveness Theory, Law Enforcement Theory, Authority Theory, Justice Theory and Benefit Theory. The results of the study indicate that application administrative sanctions for violations of visas inthe  Bali Region have not been effective, it can be seen from the data obtained in the field during the last five years there are still many foreign nationals who have been caught in violation casesand during the last five years the number of cases violations in Bali continue to increase. This shows that administrative sanctions do not provide a deterrent effect for perpetrators and other foreigners. Therefore, the immigration authorities should be firm in bringing cases of violations and misuse of visas to court. Immigration officers' efforts to prevent visa violations in Bali are in the form of preventive and repressive measures, the Immigration Office in Bali coordinates withrelevant agencies or agencies, receives reports and follows up on any reports, takes action against foreign nationals who violate. Obstacles faced by the Immigration Office in preventing the abuse of visa-free visits for foreigners in Bali are internal factors including limited human resources, limited operational budget for immigration control, low expertise of immigration officers in supervising foreigners, and external factors, namely the role of the community that has not been supportive immigration officers in providing correct information regarding the presence and activities of foreign nationals.]]>
<![CDATA[LEGAL REGULATION AUTHORITY TO GRANT PERMITS ON THE VENTURE CAPITAL COMPANY ]]>
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi]]>
<![CDATA[ Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 27 No. 2 (2019): September ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The authority to grant permits to venture capital companies has a dualism of authority. The Financial Services Authority and the Ministry of Finance both have the authority to give licenses to venture capital companies. It can be seen that there are overlaps or conflicts of authority in this case institutional or legal institutions are authorized to give permission to venture capital companies. A norm of conflict over the authority of granting permission to venture capital companies, namely the Minister of Finance Regulation No. 18 / PMK.010 / 2012 concerning Venture Capital Companies (VCC) in Article 11 paragraph (1) VCCs are established in the form of limited liability companies or cooperatives, Article 12 paragraph (1) Legal entities as referred to Article 11 paragraph (1) the which carry out activities as VCC must first obtain a business permit from the Minister. Whereas the Financial Services Authority (FSA) Regulation No. 34 / POJK.05 / 2015 Concerning Business Licensing and Institutional Venture Capital Companies, in article 3 Paragraph (1) Every party conducting business activities for VCC or Sharia VCC must obtain a business license from the FSA. On the one hand the Ministry of Finance has the authority to issue a Venture Capital Company permit, but on the other hand the Financial Services Authority is also authorized to issue a Venture Capital Company permit. It is understandable that the position of state institutions and / or institutions of the Ministry of Finance with the Financial Services Authority is equal, in this case the same law was born, namely Law Number 39 of 2008 concerning the State Ministry and Law No. 21 of 2011 concerning Institutions Financial Services Authority.]]>
<![CDATA[Aspek De Jure Perlindungan Lagu dan Royalti Pasca Pemberlakuan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 56 Tahun 2021 ]]>
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi]]>;
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu Dewi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p09
<![CDATA[This writing aimed to analyze, identify and elaborate the legal protection of song and music based on the prevailing law concerning Copyrights and the mechanism of collecting and distributing of royalty after the enactment of Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021. This article was normative legal research using statutory approach, conceptual approach and analytical approach. The study indicated that song is one of the objects of copyright which is protected under the provision of Article 40-point d of the Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The enactment of Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021 emphasized that the mechanism for managing royalties for songs and/or music is carried out through the National Collective Management Institutions. To realize a royalty management for songs and/or music, it is necessary to have awareness on the part of the Author, Copyright Holder, and Related Rights owners to carry out the Recording of songs and/or music and there needs to be awareness from parties who use songs and/or music in a form of public service that is commercial in nature to fulfill obligations in the form of royalty payments to Authors, Copyright Holders and/or Related Rights owners through National Collective Management Institutions. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk menganalisis, mengidenfitikasi, dan mengelaborasi perlindungan hukum atas lagu berdasarkan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait hak cipta, dan mekanisme pemungutan dan pengelolaan royalti setelah diberlakukannya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56/2021. Artikel ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep serta pendekatan analisis. Studi menunjukkan bahwa lagu merupakan objek perlindungan hak cipta sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 40 huruf d Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Dengan diberlakukannya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2021 mempertegas bahwa mekanisme pengelolaan royalti atas lagu dan/atau musik dilakukan melalui Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Nasional. Untuk mewujudkan suatu pengelolaan royalti atas lagu dan/atau musik, diperlukan adanya kesadaran dari pihak Pencipta, Pemegang Hak Cipta, dan pemilik Hak Terkait untuk melakukan Pencatatan atas lagu dan/atau musik dan perlu adanya kesadaran dari pihak yang memanfaatkan lagu dan/atau musik dalam bentuk layanan public yang bersifat komersial untuk melakukan pemenuhan kewajiban berupa pembayaran royalti kepada Pencipta, Pemegang Hak Cipta dan/atau pemilik Hak Terkait melalui LMKN.]]>
<![CDATA[SUBSTANSI HUKUM KEKABURAN NORMA PADA PERALIHAN HAK CIPTA ]]>
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): September, Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23887/jpku.v8i3.28603
<![CDATA[Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014tentang Hak Cipta pada pasal 16 ayat 2 huruf f menyatakan Hak Cipta dapat beralih atau dialihkan, baik seluruh maupun sebagian karena sebab lain yang dibenarkan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Makna pada frasa karena sebab lain tersebut menimbulkan kekaburan norma (vague norm) yang berakibat pada timbulnya ketidakpastian hukum terhadap pengaturan pasal tersebut. Tujuan penelitian untuk memperjelas makna frasa karena sebab lain pada Pasal 16 huruf f . Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan yaitu penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian yakni bahwa dapat disebut mengandung tafsir suatu norma yang kabur dalam hal ini diperkuat dengan tidak adanya suatu penjelasan yang signifikan dan atau suatu penjelasan yang lugas dan terarah untuk menjelaskan suatu makna karena sebab lain pada Bab Penjelasan didalam Pasal 16 huruf f Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Bahwa semestinya wajib secara spesifik menjelaskan khususnya pada frasa karena sebab lain agar tidak menimbulkan kebingungan apa yang dimaksud dengan karena sebab lain pada pengaturan pasal 16huruf f tersebut. Kesimpulan yakni makna pada frasa karena sebab lain tersebut dapat menimbulkan kekaburan norma (vague norm) yang berakibat pada timbulnya ketidakpastian hukum terhadap pengaturan pasal 16huruf f tersebut. Rekomendasi maka diperlukannya suatu revisi terhadap pengaturan Pasal 16 huruf f Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta khususnya pada Bab Penjelasan pasal 16 tersebut.]]>
<![CDATA[LEGAL REGULATIONS COPYRIGHT TRANSITION AT PERSPECTIVE IUS CONSTITUENDUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Februari, Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23887/jpku.v9i1.32725
<![CDATA[Pencabutan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2002 tentang Hak Cipta atas lahirnya undang-undang hak cipta yang baru yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dengan sendirinya akan membawa perubahan mendasar pada pengaturan hak cipta di Indonesia. Salah satunya dalam ketentuan Pasal 16 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta, disebutkan bahwa Hak Cipta dapat dialihkan atau dialihkan, baik seluruhnya maupun sebagian karena: a. warisan; b. hibah; c. wakaf; d. akan; e. kesepakatan tertulis; atau f. alasan lain yang dibenarkan sesuai dengan ketentuan perundang-undangan. Secara khusus dalam ketentuan Pasal 16 ayat (2) huruf f Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta disebutkan bahwa “alasan lain yang dapat dibenarkan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan”. Pengertian frasa '' karena alasan lain '' menimbulkan multitafsir asalkan dibenarkan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan, sehingga perlu dipertanyakan peraturan perundang-undangan mana yang dijadikan tolok ukur agar frasa terkait hak cipta dapat menjadi acuan. dialihkan atau dialihkan, baik seluruhnya maupun sebagian karena alasan lain yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Substansi asli pasal 16 ayat (2) huruf f Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta yang menyebutkan hak cipta dapat dialihkan atau dialihkan, baik seluruhnya maupun sebagian karena alasan lain yang dibenarkan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan, dalam hal ini kasus yang menyebabkan norma kabur (vague norm) yang berakibat pada munculnya ketidakpastian hukum tentang regulasi pasal tersebut.]]>
<![CDATA[Pergeseran Fungsi Pura di Bali: Dari Ritual ke Pertemuan Politik ]]>
<![CDATA[A.A Sagung Ngurah Indradewi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies) Vol 6 No 2 (2016): RUANG IMAJINER DAN RUANG PUBLIK DI BALI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Kajian Bali Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (317.278 KB)
<![CDATA[This article tries to assert the focus of discussion on the function of temples in Bali that shifts to sociological and political functions. The external pressure sociological and political dimensions are assumed to be able to shift or to complete the function of the temple as a place of worship for Hindus in Bali. The sociological function of temple is as a means of reunion for Hindus who live far from their family and the political function is the temple can be used as a place to hold political meetings by political leaders who will participate in local elections. Can the temple functions be shifted? Six informants who are considered being the most competent to answer this question stated “not” because it is due to a political meeting included giving donation for the temple maintenance and helping to finance such a big scale ceremony of Hindus in Bali.]]>
<![CDATA[Kedudukan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Modal Ventura Asing ]]>
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Aktual Justice Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Aktual Justice ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Hukum Pascasarjana Univeristas Ngurah Rai ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i2.536
<![CDATA[The juridical basis for supervision of foreign venture capital companies is contained in the provisions of Capital Law No. 21 of 2008 concerning the Financial Services Authority (OJK), Presidential Regulation No. 9 of 2009 concerning Financing Institutions and Minister of Finance Regulation No. 18 / PMK.010 / 2012 concerning Venture Capital Companies. Foreign venture capital companies that invest directly in Indonesia are a form of foreign investment. This is inseparable from the wide scope of foreign capital, which is defined as capital owned by foreign countries, individual foreign citizens, foreign business entities, foreign legal entities, and / or Indonesian legal entities whose capital is partly or wholly owned by foreign parties. Supervision of foreign investment is carried out by the Investment Coordinating Board in accordance with the provisions of Law No. 25 of 2007 concerning Investment. In accordance with the provisions in Permenkeu No. 18 / PMK / 0.10 / 2012 explained that the scope of supervision of venture capital carried out by the OJK is only limited to PMV Indonesia (Cooperatives or Limited Liability Companies). The implication is that OJK cannot supervise foreign PMVs that carry out direct financing. Because financing activities by foreign venture capital companies have intersecting rules, it is appropriate that foreign venture capital regulations only follow one specific rule. The regulation regarding financing institutions is only regulated in a Presidential Regulation. Although hierarchically, the status of the Perpres is an implementing regulation of the Law, the substance it regulates is not identical with the provisions of the Law which mandates it. Therefore, the provisions regarding financing activities should be regulated in a separate Law]]>
