Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.555
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Adigama Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris
Mariske Myeke Tampi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP KONSUMEN YANG DIRUGIKAN AKIBAT PEMBATALAN SEPIHAK OLEH PERUSAHAAN PENGEMBANG YANG TIDAK MEMENUHI KEWAJIBANNYA (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 721 K/PDT.SUS-BPSK/2020.) Silvia Loka; Mariske Myeke Tampi
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17815

Abstract

Buying and selling in Article 1457 of the Civil Code is an event where one party binds himself with another party to deliver goods/services in accordance with the agreement. In buying and selling apartments, there is a PPJB (Sales and Purchase Binding Agreement) which serves as a legal guarantee to the buyer. In the example of the Supreme Court Decision Number 721 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020, the Buyer does not get PPJB from the initial installment until the installment is paid off. How is the legal protection for consumers who are harmed due to unilateral cancellation by a developer company that does not fulfill its obligations? This research uses normative research methods. Research data shows that in deciding a dispute, the UUPK should be considered as one of the laws to protect consumers from default actions committed by developing companies.
TINJAUAN TERHADAP PENJUALAN MASKER BEKAS DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN NOMOR 444/PID.SUS/PN.BDG) Putribani Anak Haki; Mariske Myeke Tampi
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17912

Abstract

Consumer protection having tremendous scope for consumer protection indeed guarantees the rights of the community as a consumer of both goods and services. One form of consumer protection is the consumer protection of medical masks. Nowadays, medical masks are recognised as a need in the middle of Covid-19 pandemic which was formally laid down by the government through the Presidential Decree number 11 year 2020. Nevertheless, there are still business doers that obtain a personal gain by an unkind manner amid this condition, such as the sale of recycled medical masks which were never meant to be used more than once. This study will use the court ruling number 444 / pid.sus / 2020 / pn.bdg which would be studied based on Indonesian consumer protection law. This study used a normative juridical method with the Indonesian consumer protection approach and court ruling approach.
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PENGGUNA LISTRIK PASCA BAYAR TERHADAP KENAIKAN TAGIHAN LISTRIK PLN SECARA TIBA-TIBA DIMASA PANDEMI COVID-19 (STUDI KENAIKAN LISTRIK PERIODE APRIL-MEI DAN JUNI 2020) Jepri Hasiholan; Mariske Myeke Tampi
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i1.10847

Abstract

That the recording of the Kwh meter independently that was carried out by PLN during the Covid-19 pandemic in the April, May and June 2020 periods, PLN had violated consumer rights. The articles mentioned are Article 4 letter c and g of the Consumer Protection Law in conjunction with Article 29 Paragraph (1) letter a of the Electricity Law in conjunction with Article 1338 Paragraph (1) KUHPer. PLN does not carry out the obligations that are the rights of consumers and that have become an agreement is a form of violation and injures consumer rights. The existence of Covid-19 cannot be a reason for PLN because it can implement health protocols and in recording meters between consumers and meter registrar employees there is no direct contact. Thus, the Kwh meter recording program independently during the Covid-19 pandemic did not provide protection for consumers. The settlement mechanism that can be carried out is an increase of more than 20 percent, so that the payment for consumers is only required to pay the electricity bill for June 2020 plus 40 percent of the difference between the previous month's bills (March, April and May) using the 3-month average usage rate. Then the remaining 60 percent is paid in the next 3 months at a rate of 20 percent every month.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN TERKAIT HARGA MASKER YANG MELONJAK TINGGI DISAAT PANDEMI COVID-19 BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Cornelia Dewi Anggarani; Mariske Myeke Tampi
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10602

Abstract

The world is currently facing Covid-19, where the virus has spread throughout the world, including Indonesia. The President and Government appealed to the public to maintain health, follow health protocols such as wearing masks when outside the home. Lots of people buy basic necessities, so there is panic buying. Masks are currently experiencing scarcity, considering that masks are one of the basic necessities, so they are expensive. The increase in the price of these masks has made it difficult for less fortunate consumers to buy masks. Then what about the legal protection for consumers regarding the expensive price of masks? The author examines these problems using normative legal research methods. Research data shows people who complain about these expensive masks. The government should give the community masks periodically or free every once a month, so that people who are less fortunate can also have masks to prevent the corona virus.
ANALISIS KEWENANGAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK) DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ANTARA NASABAH DENGAN BANK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 218K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2019) Kevin Hanif Nasution; Mariske Myeke Tampi
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i1.12008

Abstract

Consumer protection is often found in people's lives, of course in consumer protection there are business actors and consumers, in a healthy business there must be parties who are harmed in it and there are institutions that resolve disputes of the parties, namely BPSK, BPSK in carrying out their duties and authorities it is impossible to cross the line in the Consumer Protection Law Article 52, in the case that the author raised, the Supreme Court Judge decided that BPSK was not authorized to resolve banking consumer disputes and overturned the decision of the district court, this decision caused losses to consumers because consumers could not get their rights However, if you understand the contents of Article 52 BPSK has the authority to resolve any consumer disputes both in the goods and services sector and across sectors, as long as in terms of carrying out its duties and authorities it does not exceed what has been stipulated in the Law and in the future. Consumer protection laws that are now being updated with new ones so that in the future it does not cause confusion in the event of a dispute between business actors and consumers.
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PENERIMA MANFAAT ASURANSI PERTANGGUNGAN JIWA ATAS POLIS YANG DINYATAKAN LAPSE SECARA SEPIHAK PASCA DIAJUKAN KLAIM (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 628 PDT.G/2019/PN.JKT.BRT) Ruth Yaniasni Leonita; Mariske Myeke Tampi
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10579

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the form of legal protection for consumers who receive life insurance benefits for policies declared unilaterally lapse after the claim is submitted and from the perspective of the insurance company PT. Panin Dai-Ichi Life for providing information on policy status that was declared lapse. The results of the study showed that the form of legal protection for insurance consumers in this case was preventive and repressive protection. Preventive through mediation to BMAI, and repressive through court lawsuits. In his lawsuit, the judge has won the consumer, but there is an appeal so that consumers have not received legal protection for compensation. In addition, external protection through the Consumer Protection Act and internal protection through insurance policies. However, the Consumer Law was unable to ensnare PT. Panin Dai-Ichi  Life for violating Article 4 letter c and Article 7 letter b has no legal sanction. Likewise, internal protection can be seen from the insurance policy if the lawsuit for violating Article 18 Paragraph (1) letter f regarding standard clauses is proven proven, then the business actor based on Article 62 Paragraph (1) may be subject to imprisonment and fines. Thus it can be concluded that through external protection the Consumer Protection Act, in this case it has not been able to protect consumers.
EFEKTIVITAS MEDIASI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN OLEH BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK) DI D.K.I. JAKARTA Mia Hadiati; Mariske Myeke Tampi
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 8 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (326.395 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/prio.v8i2.14980

Abstract

Sengketa konsumen merupakan salah satu hal yang perlu diresponi secara pro-aktif mengingatperkembangan bidang perindustrian dan perdagangan secara nasional maupun dalam skopa kawasanASEAN. Mediasi merupakan salah satu alternatif penyelesaian sengketa baik secara out of courtmaupun sebagai bagian dalam penyelesaian perkara di pengadilan dalam menyelesaikan sengketakonsumen. Penyelesaian sengketa melalui BPSK merupakan salah satu penyelesaian sengketa di luarpengadilan dengan menggunakan mediasi sebagai salah satu alternatif penyelesaian sengketanya.Efektifitas ini dilihat berdasarkan terbentuknya Akta Perdamaian dari kedua belah pihak yangbersengketa. Jika Akta Perdamaian terbentuk, maka hal tersebut dapat dijadikan tolok ukur efektifnyamediasi. Hukum acara yang berlaku baik Pasal 130 HIR maupun Pasal 154 Rbg, mendorong parapihak untuk menempuh proses perdamaian yang dapat diintensifkan dengan cara mengintegrasikanproses ini ke dalam peradilan. Oleh karena itu, posisi mediasi sebagai bagian dari Hukum AcaraPerdata sejatinya dapat memperkuat dan mengoptimalkan fungsi lembaga peradilan dalampenyelesaian sengketa. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan normatifempirisdengan spesifikasi deskriptif-analitis dalam menelaah mengenai efektifitas mediasi dalamsengketa konsumen oleh Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) di DKI Jakarta.Pengolahan dan analisis data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode analisis normatifkualitatif.
Co-Authors Anju Syafana Ananda Cornelia Dewi Anggarani Egy Pratama Fernando Chandra Jepri Hasiholan Kelly Kelly Kevin Hanif Nasution Leonardo Leonardo Mia Hadiati Putribani Anak Haki Ruth Yaniasni Leonita Sergio Solaiman Silvia Loka Tamar Lidya Anggaristi P.P Verren Andreas Wahyu Alisa Putri