Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum SOL JUSTICIA Jurnal Darma Agung JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Jurnal Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional
Arief Wisnu Wardhana , Irwanto
Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : SOL JUSTICIA

 1 
PENYIDIKAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENGOPLOSAN BERAS BULOG DI KABUPATEN LAHAT OLEH DIREKTORAT RESERSE KRIMINAL KHUSUS POLDA SUMATERA SELATAN Arief Wisnu Wardhana , Irwanto
SOL JUSTICIA Vol 2 No 1 (2019): SOL JUSTICIA
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Kader Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (556.783 KB)

Abstract

The investigation conducted by the Special Crime Directorate, South Sumatra Regional Police conducted on Tuesday July 18, 2017, related to the reproses of rice is not good quality and contrary to Article 1 paragraph 4 of Law No. 18 of 2012 which basically rice must be good quality. Good quality in terms of decreased quality of rice (yellow, dusty, dull, lice, smelly). The objective of this research is to know the investigation of Bulog Rice. This study uses normative research research methods, namely legal research that focuses on the analysis of legislation. The results of the investigation of the Criminal Investigation of the Coppers occurred on Subdivre Lahat has fulfilled the requirements as required in Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure, both the requirements of witness testimony and expert information on the quality down rice have met the requirements. so the investigation does not find evidence of criminal incidents as prescribed in Article 62 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 8 paragraph (1) a, (2) and (3) of Law no. It is not proven because the reprocessing rice has not been distributed, therefore the investigator issues the SP3 on the grounds that there is insufficient evidence. The investigator's of rice quality drops is basically absent, but there is a mistake in the focus of the investigation of the criminal incident according to Article 62 paragraph (1) jo Article 8 paragraph (1) a, (2) and (3) of Law no. 8 Year 1999.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PELAPOR TERSANGKA (JUSTICE COLLABORATOR) DALAM PERKARA PIDANA KORUPSI Arief Wisnu Wardhana
SOL JUSTICIA Vol 4 No 1 (2021): SOL JUSTICIA
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Kader Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (478.341 KB) | DOI: 10.54816/sj.v4i1.330

Abstract

Justice Collaborator interpreted initiative to provide information / information about the crime comes from within the self-perpetrator acknowledging his actions and then assisting law enforcement officials by providing information related to the crime committed and the involvement of other principal actors of the nature of the criminal network, although There is a difference between the two terms above there are similarities that both are perpetrators of criminal acts. The term Justice Collaborator in the Indonesian criminal justice system is a novelty, explicitly the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the Corruption Act and other Law not regulating the Justice Collaborator and in accordance with developments in enforcement practices Criminal law which is then received attention and subsequently regulated in the positive law of Indonesia.Justice Collaborator initiative to provide information / information about the crime comes from within the perpetrator of his conscience acknowledge his actions done and then assist law enforcement officials by providing information relating to criminal acts Conducted and the involvement of other key actors in the criminal network, although there is a difference between the two terms above there are similarities that both are the perpetrators of the crime.Therefore the need for integration of the criminal justice system so that suat U the system seeks to balance the protection of interests of both the interests of the state, society and individuals, including the interests of criminals and victims of crime. This is in line with the ultimate goal of criminal politics, namely the protection of society within the framework of wisdom to achieve social welfare or social politics. With the criminal justice system, the protection of human dignity and human dignity in the criminal process. It can be said that the wisdom to achieve the goals of the welfare of the community which is the goal of the welfare state law must be supported by the policy of criminal law enforcement through the criminal justice system primarily through formal criminal law.According to Muladi integrated criminal justice system is synchronization or alignment of structural, substantial and culture. The three things are interrelated and affect. The functioning of an integrated and well-defined criminal justice system is determined to what extent these three synchronizations work. If there is a weakness in one of the system work component will affect the other components in the integrated system. The criminal justice system as described in the KUHAP is an integrated criminal justice system laid out on the principle of "functional differentiation" between law enforcement agencies / institutions according to the stage of the process of authority granted by law.
Co-Authors Cholidi Cholidi Cholidi Zainuddin Devi Iriansyah Dian Afrianti Fadliana Fathinuddin Helwan Kasra Hendri Farozah Mahfuz, Abdul Latif