Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.041
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JSEH (Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Humaniora) Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum HUKUMAH: Jurnal Hukum Islam Majalah Ilmiah Warta Dharmawangsa JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI SIGn Jurnal Hukum BERDAYA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Mahadi : Indonesia Journal of Law
Zainal Abidin Pakpahan
Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara
Religion Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : SIGn Jurnal Hukum

 1 
Peninjauan Kembali terhadap Putusan Praperadilan: Analisis Kritis Kewenangan dan Pengaruhnya Simamora, Sahat; Pakpahan, Zainal Abidin; Toni, Toni
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 6 No 2: Oktober 2024 - Maret 2025
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v6i2.367

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal authority related to filing for Judicial Review against Pretrial Rulings and its implications for the enforcement of justice in Indonesia. The study employs a normative legal research method with a statute approach. The collected legal materials are then analyzed qualitatively to describe the issues and address the research objectives. The research findings indicate that the authority to file for Judicial Review against Pretrial Rulings is a complex legal issue. Although Law Number 8 of 1981 does not explicitly provide for it, there are legal grounds that allow for such Judicial Review to be pursued. Suspects, Legal Advisor, and Prosecutors are the legal subjects authorized to file for Judicial Review. However, implementing Judicial Review against Pretrial Rulings still faces several challenges, particularly concerning public understanding and accessibility to the justice system. The Decision of Judicial Review on Pretrial Rulings has broad implications, not only affecting the fate of the individuals involved in the case but also contributing significantly to the protection of human rights, legal certainty, and improving the quality of law enforcement in Indonesia. The Supreme Court has a crucial role in providing clear and comprehensive guidelines regarding the technical implementation of Judicial Review against Pretrial Rulings, whether through the issuance of jurisprudence, a Circular of the Supreme Court, or reform of criminal procedural law. Reforming the procedure for filing for Judicial Review, which includes simplifying the procedure, intensifying public awareness campaigns, and optimizing the role of legal aid institutions, becomes crucial in enhancing access to justice and the protection of human rights.
Jerat Hutang: Analisis Putusan Nomor 612/Pid.B/2023/PN Rhl Tentang Kejahatan terhadap Kemerdekaan Orang Khoiri, Syahid Al; Pakpahan, Zainal Abidin; Toni, Toni
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 6 No 2: Oktober 2024 - Maret 2025
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v6i2.374

Abstract

This research aims to analyze Decision Number 612/Pid.B/2023/PN Rhl concerning the crime of kidnapping as a crime against personal freedom motivated by debt issues. This normative legal research employs a statute approach and a case study. Data analysis uses a qualitative content analysis to describe the issues and answer the research objectives. The research results indicate that Decision Number 612/Pid.B/2023/PN Rhl explicitly criminalizes acts of deprivation of liberty committed to resolving debt problems. The Panel of Judges’ considerations highlight the psychological impact of trauma on the victim as an aggravating factor, while the Defendants’ remorse and attempts at reconciliation serve as mitigating factors. Nevertheless, this act of kidnapping remains an ordinary offence whose legal process cannot be overridden by agreements between the parties. The implications of this decision provide a comprehensive understanding of the boundaries that must not be violated in debt collection. Thus, Decision Number 612/Pid.B/2023/PN Rhl contributes to creating a just and equitable legal climate and provides guaranteed protection of human rights in the context of debt collection.
Co-Authors Abd. Hakim Abdul Hakim Hamdi Hamdi IMAWANTO, IMAWANTO Irianti, Fitriani Junus, Nasran Khairani, Lela Khoiri, Syahid Al LELISARI, LELISARI Listina, Listina M, Indra Kumalasari Nainggolan, Elian S Christoper Nasution, Thorique Akbar Maulana Safitri, Indri Tiya Siagian, Chandra Siahaan, Nimrot Simamora, Sahat Siregar, Risdalina Tambunan, Haris Nixon Tanjung, Ridho Aulia Tauhid, Hendri Toni, Toni Veithzal Rivai Zainal Yasmin, Ananda Sabillah