Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ecodemica : Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Res Nullius Law Journal
Sudjana Sudjana
Universitas Padjadjaran
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
DESAIN KEMASAN PRODUK (Analisis Perbandingan: Efektivitas Pelindungan Desain Industri atau Merek ) Sudjana Sudjana
Jurnal Ecodemica : Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Ecodemica: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Bisnis
Publisher : LPPM Universitas BSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (158.922 KB) | DOI: 10.31294/jeco.v4i1.7342

Abstract

Kesuksesan bisnis penjualan  produk  barang tidak semata-mata ditentukan oleh kualitas barang yang bagus  tetapi juga Desain Kemasan produk yang memiliki kesan estetis sehingga dapat menarik minat konsumen untuk membelinya. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan pelindungan Desain Produk Kemasan dalam  rezim Desain Industri atau Merek 3 (tiga) dimensi dan   efektivitas perlindungan Desain Kemasan Produk  melalui  analisis perbandingan  antara  Desain Industri atau Merek  3 (tiga) Dimensi.Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode Pendekatan yuridis normatif  dengan menitikberatkan pada data sekunder dan    analisis data  dilakukan melalui normatif kualitatif.Hasil kajian menunjukan bahwa (1). Desain Kemasan Produk  mendapat pelindungan berganda (double protection), yaitu  pelindungan Desain Industri berkaitan dengan produk  yang  mensyaratkan aspek kebaruan dan memiliki kesan estetis. Selain itu,  Desain Kemasan Produk  juga mendapat pelindungan Merek  3 (tiga) dimensi apabila berupa tanda yang ditampilkan secara grafis  dan memiliki daya pembeda pada barang yang diperdagangkan. (2). Pelindungan Desain Produk Kemasan akan lebih efektif dilindungi melalui Merek 3 (tiga) dimensi karena jangka waktu pelindungan  dapat  diperpanjang dengan persyaratan tertentu sehingga  pemanfaatkan hak ekonomi  lebih lama dibandingkan Desain Industri. Namun, apabila dilihat dari efisiensi biaya pendaftaran, maka pelindungan Desain  Produk Kemasan  melalui Desain Industri lebih efektif  daripada biaya pendaftaran merek karena lebih murah. 
Konten Video Parodi pada Platform Digital dalam Perspektif Pelindungan Hak Cipta dan Doktrin Fair Use Shafira Shava Rahmanissa; Sudjana Sudjana; Sudaryat Sudaryat
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 15, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v15i1.9351

Abstract

Parody video content on digital platforms is generally made by imitating previous works, but in it, there are also characteristics of parody makers that are different from the original work. The purpose of this study was to determine the application of the fair use doctrine, namely the doctrine that allows the use of copyrighted material without the creator's permission concerning parody video content on digital platforms and to describe the copyright protection of parody video content reviewed under Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. This research is normative legal research by examining library materials or secondary data. The approach method used is a conceptual approach (conceptual approach), statutory approach (statute approach), and comparative approach (comparative approach). The data were obtained through a literature study using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. These data were processed and analyzed, then presented in a qualitative descriptive manner. The results of the study show that the application of the fair use doctrine to parody video content on digital platforms is limited in some instances. Parody video content can be considered fair use if it meets the indicators required in the provisions of Article 43 letter d or Article 44 paragraph (1) letter a UUHC. These indicators include being non-commercial, benefiting the creator or copyright holder of the original work, or he expresses no objection, or as long as the parody video content mentions and includes the full name of the creator or copyright holder of the original work, aims to criticize an issue, and does not harm the interests of the original work. From the creator or the copyright holder of the original work. Copyright protection can apply to parody video content on digital platforms made with the permission of the creator or copyright holder of the original work and are original, namely as derivative works. However, parody video content does not meet the requirements as a derivative work or is even proven to violate Copyright. In that case, it cannot be protected unless it is considered fair use.
AKIBAT HUKUM PENGHAPUSAN DAN PEMBATALAN MEREK TERDAFTAR TERHADAP HAK ATAS MEREK (Eletion and Cancellation of Registered Marks in The Perspective of Legal Certainty) Sudjana sudjana
Res Nullius Law Journal Vol 2 No 2 (2020): Volume 2 No 2 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/rnlj.v2i2.3076

Abstract

Pelindungan terhadap merek yang terdaftar berdasarkan prinsip konstitutif dan penghapusan dan percabutannya memiliki akibat hukum. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan kriteria penghapusan dan pembatalan merek terdaftar dan akibat hukumnya, sehingga kajian ini diharapkan memiliki kegunaan akademik dan praktis. Metode penelitian dalam kajian ini:Jenis penelitian hukum normatif , Sifat penelitian dekriptif, Sumber data: data sekunder, Teknik dan prosedur pengumpulan data melalui studi dokumentasi dan Analisis data: normatif kualitatif. Hasil kajian menunjukan kriteria penghapusan Merek merek terdaftar karena (1). tidak digunakan (non use) pada kurun waktu tertentu; (2). adanya itikad tidak baik dari pemilik merek terdaftar; (3). pengajuan keberatan ke Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Kriteria Pembatalan merek, (1). dilakukan oleh pihak yang memiliki legal standing; (2). waktu tertentu; (3). diajukan ke pengadilan niaga. Akibat hukum Penghapusan merek terdaftar, (1). tidak serta merta menghapuskan perjanjian lisensi kecuali diperjanjikan sebelumnya; (2) pengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan niaga. Pembatalan merek terdaftar berakibat (1). gugatan oleh pihak yang merasa dirugikan; (2). sertifikat merek tidak berlaku lagi dan pencoretan merek terdaftar.
PENGGUNAAN PRINSIP KONSTITUTIF PADA MEREK DALAM PERSPEKTIF TEORI PELINDUNGAN DAN TUJUAN HUKUM Sudjana Sudjana
Res Nullius Law Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Volume 3 No 1 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/rnlj.v3i1.3695

Abstract

This study discusses the use of constitutive principles (first to file) on brands based on Act No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications in the perspective of protection theory and legal purposes. Research methods used: normative juridical approach, by examining library materials or secondary data through primary legal materials (legislation), secondary legal materials (opinions of legal experts), and tertiary legal materials (dictionaries and other sources); descriptive analysis research specifications; and data analysis is done in a qualitative normative manner. The results of the study showed: (1). The theory of protection that is in accordance with the basis for consideration is issued Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning brands in point a is Public Benefit and Economic Growth Stimulus Theory. But in its implementation, it must be supported by other brands of legal protection theory, namely Reward Theory; Recovery Theory; Incentive Theory; and Risk Theory. (2). The use of constitutive principles (first to file) in brands reflects the legal objectives of "certainty" and means of social change but does not pay much attention to aspects of "fairness" and expediency. "
PENEGAKAN HUKUM MEREK DALAM HUKUM INDONESIA TERHADAP PEMENUHAN KETENTUAN TRIPS- WTO Sudjana Sudjana
Res Nullius Law Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Volume 3 No 2 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/rnlj.v3i2.4659

Abstract

Indonesia needs to apply the TRIPs-WTO Agreement in its national law because it has ratified the International Agreement through Law No. 7 of 1994. Therefore, this study raises issues regarding the application of the provisions of the WTO TRIPs Agreement on Trademarks in Indonesian Positive Law, and the Obstacles to the Indonesian Trademark Law in fulfilling the requirements in law enforcement as stipulated in the TRIPs-WTO agreement. The approach method used is juridical normative or doctrinal through a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The research was conducted through literature studies to examine primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials as well as data analysis methods carried out through qualitative normative. The results of the study show that the provisions of the TRIPs-WTO Agreement on Trademarks have been applied in Indonesian Positive Law and even exceed the minimum standards required by the International Agreement. The obstacles to the Indonesian Trademark Law to meet the requirements in law enforcement as stipulated in the TRIPs-WTO Agreement include legal substantiations, legal structures and legal culture of society.
EFEKTIVITAS PENANGGULANGAN PEMBAJAKAN KARYA CIPTA DALAM PERSPEKTIF SISTEM HUKUM Sudjana Sudjana
Res Nullius Law Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Volume 4 No 1 Januari 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/rnlj.v4i1.5939

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of countermeasures against copyright piracy from a legal system perspective. The research method used is a normative juridical approach, starting from secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique was carried out through document study and qualitative normative data analysis. The legal structure is related to Law no. 28/2014 concerning Copyright still has obstacles related to the consistency of law enforcers (especially investigators, especially Civil Servant Investigators) who have carried out their functions but have not been effective due to internal and external constraints. In terms of legal substance, the Copyright Law has a normative weakness, namely adhering to a complaint offense against copyright crimes which causes law enforcement to take longer. Meanwhile, in terms of legal culture, the public has not fully respected the creations of other parties, as evidenced by the increasing number of piracy of copyright works and a way of thinking that considers intellectual property including copyright to only have a social function, even though it is also an individual right that has economic value. Therefore, the application of the legal system according to Friedman on the effectiveness of counter piracy of copyright works has not been effective.
Co-Authors Shafira Shava Rahmanissa Sudaryat