Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.152
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Iuris JUSTISI Midang Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Artaji Artaji
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Keabsahan Keadaan Solven Debitor sebagai Dasar Pertimbangan dalam Perkara Kepailitan Clarita Stefanie Panjaitan; R. Kartikasari; Artaji Artaji
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i1.27480

Abstract

AbstractThis article will discuss the basic considerations of the judge in considering the debtor’s solvent condition as the reason for rejecting the bankruptcy case. This article also provides an explanation that the consideration of debtor solvent conditions as the implementation of the principle of balance in the examination of bankruptcy cases is an essential thing to resolve the problems that occur in the Bankruptcy Law in order to create legal certainty for the parties The research method used in this article is a normative legal research method that is descriptive analytical, with the application of a normative juridical approach, by observing secondary data legal materials, with data collection techniques through document studies, with library analysis. The results of the article indicate that Judges must apply the principle of balance by taking into account the debtor’s solvent condition in examining Bankruptcy cases in order to protect the interests of the parties and the interests of the business community.Keywords: Bankruptcy; Insolvency Test; Principle of Balance.AbstrakPenelitian ini akan membahas mengenai dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam mempertimbangkan mengenai keadaan solven Debitor sebagai alasan penolakan perkara Kepailitan. Penelitian ini juga memberikan penjelasan bahwa pertimbangan keadaan solven Debitor sebagai implementasi asas keseimbangan dalam pemeriksaan perkara kepailitan, merupakan suatu hal yang esensial guna menyelesaikan problematika yang terjadi dalam Undang-Undang Kepailitan demi mewujudkan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif analitis, dengan penerapan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif, dengan melakukan pengamatan terhadap bahan-bahan hukum data sekunder, dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi dokumen, dengan analisis kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Hakim haruslah menerapkan asas keseimbangan dengan turut mempertimbangkan keadaan solven Debitor dalam memeriksa perkara Kepailitan guna melindungi kepentingan para pihak serta kepentingan masyarakat bisnis.Kata Kunci: Kepailitan; Insolvency Test; Prinsip Keseimbangan.
PENYULUHAN HUKUM MEDIASI PENYELESAIAN SECARA ISLAM DI DESA SAYANG KABUPATEN SUMEDANG Hazar Kusmayanti; Elisantris Gultom; Artaji Artaji
Midang Vol 1, No 2 (2023): Midang: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Juni 2023
Publisher : Unpad Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/midang.v1i2.46833

Abstract

Hukum Islam mengatur beberapa cara untuk menyelesaikan berbagai permasalahan sengketanya, pertama ada yang disebut dengan Al sulh (perdamaian). Al-Qur’an dan hadis dalam Islam menawarkan cara penyelesaian sengketa baik melalui pengadilan (litigasi) melalui pembuktian fakta hukum maupun di luar pengadilan (nonlitigasi) melalui perdamaian.Tim Penyuluh RKDU mengadakan penyuluhan Mediasi Hukum Islam di Desa Sayang Kabupaten Jatinangor dengan bertujuan warga masyarakat dapat meningkat kesadaran hukumnya. Metode yang digunakan adalah penyuluhan secara langsung melalui ceramah, diskusi terarah antara tim penyuluh dan warga masyarakat. Setelah penyuluhan hukum dilakukan maka didapat kesimpulan, pada tahap pengetahuan hukum, warga masyarakat Desa Sayang mengetahui sejumlah bagaimana mekanisme mediasi Islam secara non litigasi dan litigasi. Selain itu warga masyarakat Desa Sayang menjadi kesadaran hukum menjadi setelah tim penyuluh memberikan paparan mengenai materi penyelesaian sengketa melalui mediasi hukum Islam.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terkait Ketidakabsahan Perkawinan Kedua yang Fasid Karena Tidak Ada Izin Poligami dari Pengadilan Agama ditinjau dari Undang – Undang Perkawinan dan Hukum Islam Kinata Kinar Andreas Perangin – Angin; Artaji Artaji; Fatmi Utarie Nasution
Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/federalisme.v2i1.469

Abstract

This study is motivated by the high rate of marriage in Indonesia. Marriage is a sacred activity because through marriage there will be new family relationships and the consequences that arise from the marriage. The validity of a marriage in Indonesia is highly dependent on the provisions of each religion recognized in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. In Islam, a man can practice polygamy if he has met the existing conditions. Polygamy will have an impact on the validity of a marriage if the existing conditions are not met by the couple. Therefore, the validity of a marriage is very necessary in the system of the state of law.
Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Mataram Nomor 183/PDT/2023/PT MTR tentang Pemeriksaan Setempat Gugatan Kurang Pihak dan Implikasi Putusan terhadap Objek Sengketa Soraya Firmansjah; Artaji Artaji; Rai Mantili
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): September : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i5.1251

Abstract

The Mataram High Court Decision Number 183/PDT/2023/PT MTR, which upheld the Selong District Court Decision Number 59/PDT/2023/PN SEL, stated that the Appellants' (formerly the Plaintiffs) lawsuit was inadmissible because there were parties who had not been involved in the case (lack of parties). The legal fact regarding this lack of parties had actually emerged since the on-site examination stage conducted by the Panel of Judges at the first instance. In fact, this had also been expressly conveyed by the Appellees (formerly the Defendants) through an exception. However, the Panel of Judges rejected the exception and ultimately contradictorily declared the lawsuit inadmissible. This study emphasizes the urgency of considering the results of the on-site examination in relation to the lack of parties and its implications for the ownership status of the disputed object after the decision. The research method used is a normative juridical approach, with analysis referring to statutory provisions, legal doctrine, and civil law principles. Specifically, this study highlights the law of evidence and the position of on-site examination in the judicial process. The research results show that on-site inspections actually play a crucial role in assessing evidence and witness statements related to the existence of parties who should be called into the lawsuit. However, this urgency is lost because the panel of judges' considerations are inconsistent with the provisions regarding the strength of evidence as stipulated in Article 284 of the RBg. Furthermore, the exception regarding the lack of parties whose substance is similar to the results of the on-site inspection is actually set aside. A further implication of this decision is that the ownership status of the disputed object does not change. After the decision is rendered, the object remains in the possession of the Respondents, without legal clarity regarding who the party legally has authority over it.
Analisis Yuridis Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 109/Pk/Pdt/2022 dalam Kasus Dago Elos Ditinjau Berdasarkan UU No. 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria Vidi Siami Mulyanti; Nia Kurniati; Artaji Artaji
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v2i1.78

Abstract

Agrarian disputes in Indonesia often face challenges in ensuring legal certainly, including the execution of Supreme Court Decision No. 109/PK/Pdt/2022 concerning the Dago Elos land dispute. This study aims to analyze the legal certainly of the execution involving the Muller family’s claim based on the colonial Eigendom Verponding system and the physical control of the land by local communities. Using a normative judicial approach and descriptive qualitative analysis, primary legal documents and legal literature were purposively selected as the main data sources. The study found significant barriers to execution due to local community resistance and conflicts between colonial and national agrarian systems. The main conclusion highlights challenges in implementing the principle of legal certainty, even though the old rights have been recognized. The novelty of this research lies in its analysis of the relationship between colonial and national regulations in agrarian disputes. This study recommends comprehensive agrarian law reform to prevent similar conflicts and strengthen public trust in the national legal system.
Kajian Yudisial: Perlawanan Para Pihak (Partij Verzet) dalam Proses Eksekusi Hak Milik Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Perdata Putri, Azizah Kamilah; Hazar Kusmayanti; Artaji Artaji
JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v10i3.3505

Abstract

Court decisions that have legal force must be complied with, and execution carried out if the losing party does not voluntarily comply with the judgment. Issues arise when the losing party appeals or takes other legal actions, delaying execution and creating legal uncertainty. Execution is applicable only to condemnatory judgments and is often obstructed by respondent's resistance, a legal challenge from the party involved in the case. The researcher highlights three cases of legal resistance efforts: the South Jakarta District Court decision number 518/Pdt.G/1999/PN Jkt.Sel, Kendal District Court decision number 20/Pdt.Bth/2021/PN Kdl, and Kendal District Court decision number 9/Pdt.Bth/2022/PN Kdl. This study employs a normative juridical method, examining descriptive-analytical literature, and utilizes a qualitative juridical approach in analysis. The research reveals discrepancies between legal certainty theory and judicial practice, where cases may not align with facts or legal standing, leading judges to reject such requests. The study concludes that respondent's resistance is a legal recourse available to the executed party against execution, which does not automatically suspend execution unless there are clear and accepted grounds recognized by the court. The Indonesian Civil Code (HIR) and Civil Procedure Law (RBg) provide legal certainty and protect the rights of those aggrieved by court decisions through the mechanism of respondent's resistance.
Co-Authors Clarita Stefanie Panjaitan Elisantris Gultom Fatmi Utarie Nasution Hazar Kusmayanti Kinata Kinar Andreas Perangin – Angin Nia Kurniati Putri, Azizah Kamilah R. Kartikasari Rai Mantili Soraya Firmansjah Vidi Siami Mulyanti