Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Rai Mantili
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
KONSEPTUALISASI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN MELALUI SMALL CLAIMS PROSEDURE DI INDONESIA Anita Afriana; Rai Mantili; Ema Rahmawati
Arena Hukum Vol. 11 No. 3 (2018)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01003.2

Abstract

AbstractThe development of buying and selling both conventional and online transactions has an impact on the need for effective dispute resolution when there is a loss to consumers. Fast, simple, and low-cost consumer dispute resolution is needed to speed up the way the dispute is resolved. This article is part of the results of fundamental research conducted in a normative juridical method. The results showed that consumer dispute resolution in the court with a small claim value was not balanced with the mechanism of proceedings in the court, while the power of the decision through BPSK resolution was not final and binding. Small Claims Procedures are solutions that integrate informal and formal mechanisms as one of the concrete steps to achieve legal certainty in resolving consumer disputes in Indonesia.             AbstrakPerkembangan jual beli baik transaksi secara konvensional maupun online berdampak pada kebutuhan penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif ketika terjadinya kerugian pada konsumen. Penyelesaian sengketa  konsumen secara cepat, sederhana, dan berbiaya ringan diperlukan dengan mempercepat cara penyelesaian sengketa. Artikel ini merupakan bagian dari hasil penelitian fundamental yang dilakukan secara yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa konsumen di pengadilan dengan nilai gugatan yang kecil tidak seimbang dengan mekanisme beracara di pengadilan, sementara itu penyelesaian melalui BPSK kekuatan putusannya tidak bersifat final and binding. Small Claims Procedures merupakan solusi yang memadukan mekanisme informal dan formal sebagai salah satu langkah konkret dalam rangka tercapainya kepastian hukum dalam penyelesaian sengketa konsumen di Indonesia.
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 161 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2023 Mengenai Sengketa Merek Dagang antara PS GLOW dan MS GLOW Bagas Kristian Joenata; Rika Ratna Permata; Rai Mantili
Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Januari : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/jaksa.v2i1.1532

Abstract

Trademarks have a very important function, namely as a differentiator from goods or services from other trademarks as well as a reputation for the goods or services being traded. Trademarks must be protected to prevent infringement in the form of unfair competition. The aim of this research is to understand the implementation of regulations and criteria regarding violations of brand similarity in essence as well as the use of marks that are not in accordance with those registered under brand law in Indonesia. The research method used in this research is a normative juridical approach, namely by using library materials in the form of positive law as the main material and then examining its implementation into practice. The primary legal material used by the author is Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications, Law Number 15 of 2001 concerning Marks, Commercial Court Decision at the Surabaya District Court Number 2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022/ PN.Niaga.Sby, and Supreme Court Decision Number 161 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023 as well as secondary legal materials, namely related literature, to analyze the decision.
Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Mataram Nomor 183/PDT/2023/PT MTR tentang Pemeriksaan Setempat Gugatan Kurang Pihak dan Implikasi Putusan terhadap Objek Sengketa Soraya Firmansjah; Artaji Artaji; Rai Mantili
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): September : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i5.1251

Abstract

The Mataram High Court Decision Number 183/PDT/2023/PT MTR, which upheld the Selong District Court Decision Number 59/PDT/2023/PN SEL, stated that the Appellants' (formerly the Plaintiffs) lawsuit was inadmissible because there were parties who had not been involved in the case (lack of parties). The legal fact regarding this lack of parties had actually emerged since the on-site examination stage conducted by the Panel of Judges at the first instance. In fact, this had also been expressly conveyed by the Appellees (formerly the Defendants) through an exception. However, the Panel of Judges rejected the exception and ultimately contradictorily declared the lawsuit inadmissible. This study emphasizes the urgency of considering the results of the on-site examination in relation to the lack of parties and its implications for the ownership status of the disputed object after the decision. The research method used is a normative juridical approach, with analysis referring to statutory provisions, legal doctrine, and civil law principles. Specifically, this study highlights the law of evidence and the position of on-site examination in the judicial process. The research results show that on-site inspections actually play a crucial role in assessing evidence and witness statements related to the existence of parties who should be called into the lawsuit. However, this urgency is lost because the panel of judges' considerations are inconsistent with the provisions regarding the strength of evidence as stipulated in Article 284 of the RBg. Furthermore, the exception regarding the lack of parties whose substance is similar to the results of the on-site inspection is actually set aside. A further implication of this decision is that the ownership status of the disputed object does not change. After the decision is rendered, the object remains in the possession of the Respondents, without legal clarity regarding who the party legally has authority over it.
Compensation for Damages Caused by Artificial Intelligence under Indonesian Civil Law Rai Mantili; Sherly Ayuna Putri; Efa Laela Fakhriah
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.5164

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a technology that refers to the simulation of human intelligence programmed into electronic devices to think like humans and mimic human actions. The rapid development of AI has sparked debates in the legal field, particularly when errors occur and cause harm to the public. Currently, Indonesian law does not explicitly regulate legal protection for a party who suffers material or immaterial damages due to errors caused by AI. This research aims to contribute to the development of civil law discourses through a normative and descriptive approach. The data used are secondary data, and a qualitative method is used to analyze and present the data descriptively. The research finds that there are no specific regulations governing liability for material or immaterial damages resulting from AI activities. The conclusion drawn is that AI cannot be considered a legal subject and lacks control over its actions and intent. Therefore, the burden of compensation for errors caused by AI falls on the creators and users of AI, as stipulated under Article 1365 of the Civil Code and Article 1367 of the Civil Code, which states that: "A person is not only liable for losses caused by their own actions but also for losses caused by the actions of those for whom they are responsible or by goods under their supervision."
Co-Authors Anita Afriana Artaji Artaji Bagas Kristian Joenata Efa Laela Fakhriah Ema Rahmawati Rika Ratna Permata Sherly Ayuna Putri Soraya Firmansjah