Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : STI Policy and Management Journal

Perspektif Sistem Inovasi Dalam Konten Kebijakan Daerah Jawa Timur Bidang Iptek dan Inovasi Periode 2000-2011 Prakoso Bhairawa Putera
STI Policy and Management Journal Vol 10, No 2 (2012): Warta KIML (Journal of S&T Policy and R&D Management)
Publisher : Center for Science and Technology Development Studies, Indonesian Institute of Sciences

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (873.063 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/STIPM.2012.2

Abstract

Regulatory regions as the object of attention of this study are discussed in the content published policies and provide regulation of science technology and innovation in the area. Policy in the area of this study is that the regulation of East Java Province. The method of this research is using the content analysis with frame of innovation system. The results revealed that 64% of science-technology and innovation policy period from 2000 to 2011 in the province of East Java has relevance and significance to the development (research), diffusion and utilization of technology in the area. Generally the regulations in East Java emphasis on institutional strengthening, and supporting of science-technology and innovation program.
Perkembangan e-Learning di Singapura : Sebuah Pembelajaran Bagi Indonesia Prakoso Bhairawa Putra; Sri Rahayu
STI Policy and Management Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2010): Warta KIML (Journal of S&T Policy and R&D Management)
Publisher : Center for Science and Technology Development Studies, Indonesian Institute of Sciences

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (6333.374 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/STIPM.2010.105

Abstract

-
Tingkat Kolaborasi Peneliti pada Program Insentif : “Semi Top-Down”Kementrian Riset dan Teknologi, Tahun 2008-2010) Setiowiji Handoyo; Prakoso Bhairawa Putra
STI Policy and Management Journal Vol 10, No 2 (2012): Warta KIML (Journal of S&T Policy and R&D Management)
Publisher : Center for Science and Technology Development Studies, Indonesian Institute of Sciences

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1177.752 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/STIPM.2012.3

Abstract

Incentive programs the Ministry of Research and Technology (KRT) is a stimulant in order to increase collaborative research in Indonesia. Collaborative research to be a bridge of cooperation between researchers and organizations, both in terms of human resources, equipment, funds, ideas, and so forth, all through the funding support of KRT. In order to reveal the research activities financed from the Incentive Program, the research was conducted. Another objective of this research is to see how the level of collaboration/cooperation on research conducted by the researchers conducting incentive. This research is a descriptive study using quantitative data. Source data from KRT incentive program managers. Analysis was performed on all activities financed incentive incentive program KRT during 2008-2010. The results of this study concluded that from 1226 the activities carried out in the years 2008-2010 incentive program KRT greatest activity conducted applied research on the types of incentives (498 events). Meanwhile, according to the focal plane, most activities are in the areas of food security (386 events) and according to science should be in the field of engineering sciences (553 events). Collaboration of researchers at the activity level incentives earned 20.43% done in collaboration by two or more researchers.
Influential Factors of Evidence-Based Energy Policy-making: Government Regulation on Targeting Renewable Energy in Indonesia Wati Hermawati; Prakoso Bhairawa Putra; Dudi Hidayat; Ishelina Rosaira Poerbosisworo
STI Policy and Management Journal Vol 1, No 1 (2016): STI Policy and Management
Publisher : Center for Science and Technology Development Studies, Indonesian Institute of Sciences

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (801.25 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/STIPM.2016.55

Abstract

The paper is based on research identifying lessons and approaches in making energy policy and scrutinizes whether empirical evidence–based energy policy exists in Indonesia. Empirical evidence–based energy policy has the potential to reduce poverty as well as have a greater impact on the economic performance of individuals, communities and the government. In this study, we used document analysis and key informant interviews to explore empirical evidence input in energy policy-making. The results of the analysis revealed the following three points. First, there are a range of limitations in the process of energy policy-making as well as in getting an evidence inputs from concerned institutions such as universities, R&D institutions, and industries. Second, the process in making energy policy went through several stages and was not always in sequences, starting from problem identification, needs identification, advocacy, information gathering, policy drafting, and approval obtainment from the institutions concerned. Third, the most influential factor in the formulation of this energy policy is the factor of power and authority instead of knowledge and evidence. The limitations have demonstrated insufficient evidence in the policy-making. Finally, the paper suggests that a working group for data and information gathering should be created.