Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.743
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Adi Widya : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Verstek Veteran Society : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesian Journal of Law Research ARIMA : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia E-Amal: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Domus Legalis Cogitatio
Ismawati Septiningsih
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search
Journal : Verstek

 1 
Pertimbangan Hakim Mahkamah Agung Dalam Memutus Mengabulkan Permohonan Kasasi Perkara Pertambangan Dengan Adanya Dissenting Opinion (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2039 K/Pid.Sus.Lh/2016) Wildan Al Jundy; Ismawati Septiningsih
Verstek Vol 10, No 2: 2022
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i2.67624

Abstract

Abstrak: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui alasan hakim mahkamah agung dalam memutus mengabulkan permohonan kasasi perkara pertambangan dengan adanya dissenting opinion telah sesuai dengan KUHAP. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder, teknik analisis bahan hukum dengan metode silogisme melalui pola berpikir deduksi atau deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang penulis lakukan, diketahui bahwa pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung dalam mengabulkan kasasi sudah sesuai ketentuan KUHAP. Mahkamah Agung memiliki hak untuk menerima permohonan Kasasi serta memiliki hak untuk mengadili sendiri sesuai dengan Pasal 254 jo Pasal 255 ayat (1) KUHAP. Meskipun dalam memutus perkara terdapat dissenting opinion antar anggota majelis akan tetapi Mahkamah Agung dalam memutus sudah tepat yakni dengan mengambil suara terbanyak, hal ini sudah sesuai dengan yang tertuang dalam Pasal 182 ayat 6 huruf a Jo Pasal 256 KUHAP. Hal ini berarti bahwa Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan Kasasi dengan mengambil   suara terbanyak pada perbedaan pendapat Majelis Hakim dan membatalkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sarolangun. Sri Murwahyuni, SH, MH, sebagai Hakim Anggota memiliki pendapat yang berbeda yaitu alasan Kasasi Penuntut Umum tidak dapat dibenarkan, pertimbangan judex facti yang membebaskan Terdakwa dari dakwaan sudah tepat dan benar.Kata kunci: Dissenting Opinion; Kasasi; Tindak Pidana PertambanganAbstract: This article aims to know the reason of the Supreme Court Judge’s decision in granting cassation request of mining case with the dissenting opinion is in accordance with Criminal Procedure Code. The research method used is normative legal research. Legal source materials used is primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, legal materials analysis technique used is syllogistic method through deduction thinking patterns or deductive. Based on the results of the research done by the author, it was known that the Supreme Court’s consideration in granting the cassation was in accordance with Criminal Code Procedures (KUHAP). Supreme Court has the right to accept the cassation request and also has the right to adjudicate itself in accordance with  Article  254  jo  Article  255  section  (1)  Criminal  Procedure  Code  (KUHAP). Although in deciding the case there is dissenting opinion among the members of the assembly,  however  the  Supreme  Court’s  decision  by  taking  the  most  votes  is appropriate, this is in accordance with what is stated in Article 182 section 6 letter a Jo Article 256 Criminal Code Procedures (KUHAP). This means that the Supreme Court granted the Cassation by taking the most votes on the difference opinion of the Panel of Judges and cancel the decision of the Sarolangun District Court. Sri Murwahyuni, SH, MH, as a Member Judge has a different opinion, namely the reason that the Public Prosecutor's  Cassation  cannot  be  justified,  the  judex  facti  consideration  which acquitted the Defendant of the indictment is correct and correct.Keywordrs: ; Dissenting Opinion; Cassation; Mining Crimes
RATIO DECIDENDI ATAS KONSTRUKSI DAKWAAN PENUNTUT UMUM DELIK PENGGELAPAN ARISAN ONLINE (PUTUSAN NO 30/PID/2021/PT SMG) Luthfi Khansa Rasendriya Rahyono; Ismawati Septiningsih
Verstek Vol 11, No 2: 2023
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.72137

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and examine the Judges' Legal Considerations regarding the Construction of the Public Prosecutor's Indictment against the perpetrator of the Online Arisan Embezzlement Crime. Regarding how the Judge's Legal Consideration should be for the Online Arisan Crime in Decision Number 30/Pid/2021/PT SMG. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be seen that the Judge's consideration or ratio decidendi used to determine the perpetrator to be the defendant in Decision Number 30/Pid/2021/PT SMG, according to the author, is correct, as in the online arisan activity there is a criminal act of embezzlement committed by the Defendant. It can also be seen based on the results of the analysis and discussion according to the author in Decision Number 30/Pid/2021/PT SMG, apart from looking at the legal considerations above, the author looks at the prosecutor's charges, which according to the author fall into the category of lenient charges, the indictment can be explained as the prosecutor's conclusion on the examination of the case made based on the evidentiary process at trial. Judges who are the enforcers of justice become the basis for the prosecutor's charges. When considering several charges in cases that have passed, it is appropriate for the public prosecutor to impose heavier charges on the defendant.Keywords: Online Arisan; Ratio Decidendi; Construction of Public Prosecutor's Indictment
ANALISIS KETERKAITAN KEKERASAN DENGAN PERBUATAN CABUL TERHADAP ANAK Yordan Triadi Wibowo; Ismawati Septiningsih
Verstek Vol 11, No 2: 2023
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71838

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between violence and obscenity against children. This article aims to find out the relationship between violence and obscenity against children associated with doctrinal theories. This research was conducted using prescriptive doctrinal or normative legal research methods using primary and secondary legal sources which are of course related to the issues studied. The legal material collection technique used in this research is a literature study technique with a conceptual approach. Based on the results of the study, shows that violence against children using an object can be categorized as an obscenity against a child if it is aimed at a child's genitals.Keywords: Child;Violence; Obscenity
KAJIAN KENDALA EKSEKUSI PIDANA BERDASARKAN SEMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2011 DENGAN PASAL 270 KUHAP Rafi'ah Nafida Zalna; Ismawati Septiningsih
Verstek Vol 10, No 4: 2022
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i4.72656

Abstract

This article aims to determine the constraints and legitimacy of prosecutors in carrying out criminal executions based on the provisions of the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 1 of 2011 in terms of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and legal certainty. This type of legal research is normative research with primary and secondary legal materials using a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials uses library research and the technique of analyzing legal materials is deductive in nature using the syllogism method. As for the results of this study, it was found that based on Article 79 of the Supreme Court Law and Article 7, 8 paragraph of Law Number 11 of 2011 Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 1 of 2011 is not a statutory regulation, but a policy regulation that only has the power internal binding. As a result, SEMA No. 1 of 2011 by the Prosecutor in the criminal procedural law environment is a form of customary law (customary law) which also has legal certainty because the execution must be carried out against a judge's decision that has permanent legal force (in kracht van gewisjde) and has executive power. So that the execution of a crime using the excerpt of the decision certainly has legal certainty for the convict in assisting the convict to immediately obtain the convict's rights while serving his sentence as an inmate in a penitentiary.Keywords: Criminal Execution; Prosecutor's Constraints, Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA), Excerpt of the Decision
RATIO DECIDENDI DALAM PUTUSAN REHABILITASI MEDIS TERHADAP PELAKU PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA BAGI DIRI SENDIRI Gilang Rahadian Saputra; Ismawati Septiningsih
Verstek Vol 9, No 4: 2021
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72439

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the judge's considerations in passing a decision on rehabilitation for perpetrators of Narcotics Abuse for Self Group I not plants, as well as the legal instruments that regulate it. This type of legal research is normative legal research. Based on the research it was found that to determine whether abusers can be rehabilitated or not is based on the characteristics and conditions of the perpetrators, in addition to determining the classification of abusers who can be rehabilitated judges need to pay attention to the Circular of the Supreme Court (SEMA) Number 4 of 2010 concerning Placement of Abuse, Victims of Abuse and Narcotics addicts into Medical and Social Rehabilitation Institutions.Keywords: Narcotics Abuser; Medical Rehabilitation; Social Rehabilitation
PENGGUNAAN POLIGRAF (LIE DETECTOR) DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PERSETUBUHAN ANAK Agnada Risma Melati; Ismawati Septiningsih
Verstek Vol 11, No 3: 2023
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.71922

Abstract

This article analyses the use of a polygraph (lie detector) in proving cases of child intercourse in decision number: 111/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Wno. The purpose of this article is to determine the suitability of using a polygraph (lie detector) in the crime of sexual intercourse with a child under the provisions of Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This writing uses normative legal research methods that are prescriptive and applied. The approach used in this research is a case approach. Types and sources of legal materials through library research. The results of the study show that the use of a polygraph (lie detector) in the evidence carried out by the Public Prosecutor regarding the crime of sexual intercourse with a child in the decision number: 111/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Wno is in accordance with Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely as letter evidence. However, in this case its position is only limited as complementary evidence, not as the main evidence at trial, so it must be paired with other evidence to strengthen the evidentiary process in court. Keywords: Proof; Polygraph; Letter
KESALAHAN PENERAPAN HUKUM SEBAGAI ALASAN KASASI TINDAK PIDANA TURUT SERTA MEMALSUKAN SURAT SECARA BERLANJUT Arief Agha Raflyansyah; Ismawati Septiningsih
Verstek Vol 11, No 3: 2023
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73134

Abstract

This legal research aims to find out the misapplication of the law by the District Court Judge as the reason for the Public Prosecutor's cassation against the acquittal in the criminal case of participating in forging letters related to the provisions of Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the suitability of the Supreme Court's consideration in examining and deciding the Public Prosecutor's cassation in Supreme Court Decision Number 1086 K/Pid/2022. This legal research is a prescriptive and applied normative legal research with a case study approach. The source of legal material for this research comes from primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used is document study or literature study. The technique of analyzing legal materials in this study uses the syllogism method with deductive thinking patterns. The results of the research and discussion obtained are that the Public Prosecutor can prove the suitability of the reasons for cassation submitted by him with the reasons for cassation contained in Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely in terms of whether it is true that a legal rule is not applied or applied improperly. Therefore, the Supreme Court granted the cassation of the Public Prosecutor and found the defendant guilty of committing the crime charged, then imposed a prison sentence of 6 (six) month.Keywords: Cassation, Mail Forgery, Acquittal Decision.
ANALISIS PERMOHONAN PRAPERADILAN TENTANG KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN STATUS TERSANGKA (STUDI PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN NOMOR: 2/Pid.Pra/2021/ PN.Wat) Anisya Noviana Hartono; Ismawati Septiningsih
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.76176

Abstract

This article aims to determine the compatibility between the reasons for submitting a pretrial request regarding the validity of determining the suspect's status in the Pretrial Decision Number: 2/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Wat with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and other provisions relating to pretrial. This research is included in normative legal research with a case approach. Types of legal materials consist of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the research on the writing of this law show that the reason for submitting a pretrial request regarding the validity of determining the status of a suspect in the Pretrial Decision Number: 2/Pid.Pra/2021/PN.Wat is not in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, this is in accordance with the provisions of the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 21/PUU-XII/2014 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016. This shows that the provisions regarding Pretrial in the Criminal Procedure Code are not perfect, so several additional regulations are needed to perfect them as contained in the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 21/PUUXII/2014 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare pretrial procedural legal instruments in the form of a law that can ensure that the pretrial process can be carried out in a fair and accountable manner.
TELAAH KESESUAIAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 24/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN MND TERHADAP UU SPPA Muhammad Aqil Yuda Pratama; Ismawati Septiningsih
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.74571

Abstract

This writing analyzes the appropriateness of the judge's considerations in imposing a five-year prison sentence on a child with article 79 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2012. In Decision Number 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Mnd it is known that a crime of violence has occurred with joint power carried out by children. The perpetrator was subject to Article 170 of the Criminal Code paragraph (2) 3rd of the Criminal Code and considered Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System because the perpetrator was a child. The purpose of this writing is to find out whether the judge's considerations in Decision Number 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Mnd are in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. As a result, the judge in hisconsiderations before passing the decision had considered Article 79 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System.Keywords: Consideration; Collective violence; Child
Co-Authors Agnada Risma Melati Anisya Noviana Hartono Annisa Nurul Alimah Arief Agha Raflyansyah Arsyad Aldyan Gilang Rahadian Saputra Harjono Itok Dwi Kurniawan ITOK DWI KURNIAWAN Kristiyadi Luthfi Khansa Rasendriya Rahyono Muhammad Aqil Yuda Pratama Muhammad Rustamaji Rafi'ah Nafida Zalna Shafrina Amalia Rosady Sigit Dwi Nugroho Sri Wahyuningsih Yulianti Wildan Al Jundy Wiradrana Wasistha Yordan Triadi Wibowo Zakki Adlhiyati