Yatini Yatini
Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

EDUKASI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DI LUAR PENGADILAN Yatini Yatini; Raymon Raynaldo Oktavianus
Ruang Cendekia : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Ruang Cendekia: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (716.64 KB) | DOI: 10.55904/ruangcendekia.v1i1.72

Abstract

Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Kota Samarinda telah terbentuk sejak tahun 2010, yang bertugas menyelesaikan sengketa konsumen yang berada di wilayah Kota Samarinda. Sebagai lembaga penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan, BPSK memiliki kelebihan yaitu konsumen tidak dipungut biaya dan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa konsumen mengedepankan win-win solution. Meskipun telah tersedia BPSK, namun belum semua konsumen di Kota Samarinda belum memanfaatkan lembaga tersebut untuk mengadu dan menyelesaikan sengketa konsumen. Beberapa permasalahan yang menyebabkan konsumen belum memanfaatkan lembaga tersebut, karena tingkat keberdayaan konsumen masih rendah juga dikarenakan belum tersosialisasikannya BPSK kepada konsumen dengan maksimal. Karenanya sangat penting untuk dilakukan edukasi kepada konsumen tentang BPSK tersebut. Adapun metode yang digunakan yaitu melakukan edukasi melalui media online. Sasaran edukasi secara khusus adalah konsumen Kota Samarinda dan secara umum konsumen di Kalimnatan timur. Tujuannya konsumen akan mengetahui dan memahami terkait kewenangan BPSK dan selanjutnya konsumen yang memiliki permasalahan konsumen dapat memanfaatkan BPSK tersebut. Hasil kegiatan, yaitu telah terselenggara webinar secara online melalui zoom meeting. Jumlah peserta webinar sebanyak 85 orang dengan komposisi masyarakat di Kota samarinda dan mahasiswa di Kalimantan Timur.
Pelaksanaan Inventarisasi Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal Sebagai Upaya Melindungi Warisan Budaya Di Kalimantan Timur yatini yatini
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v13i2.1894

Abstract

Background: Communal Intellectual Property (KIK) as a wealth of Indonesian cultural heritage must be protected, preserved, developed, and/or utilized through an inventory, which will then be collected into the KIK Data Center in Indonesia. For the regions with KIK protection is not only a form of legal protection but also aims to encourage the economy of the community in an area and as an effort to protect cultural heritage as the identity of a region. The purpose of this study was to identify the potential and constraints in the KIK inventory in East Kalimantan Province and explore the efforts of the East Kalimantan local government in implementing the KIK inventory. Research Methods: The type of research used was socio-legal with a statutory approach and a social approach to get the maximum form of inventory implementation. The technique of data analysis was carried out, namely by analyzing statutory regulations that had been inventoried to obtain legal certainty for the implementation of the KIK inventory. Furthermore, analyzing factual data in the implementation of KIK protection and problems in the community, and offering strategic steps in organizing KIK inventory in providing legal protection for KIK in East Kalimantan. Findings: The findings after the discussion were, first, the identification of the KIK potential in East Kalimantan was carried out with an inventory. The inventory of KIK in East Kalimantan as an effort to protect the law of cultural works was carried out on a defensive basis. Second, implementation of KIK potential inventory in East Kalimantan are in two forms, namely, an inventory carried out by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights through the KIK registration mechanism, then entered into the KIK Data Center, and Education and Culture Office through a recording mechanism which was then determined become WBTB. Then, there were still differences in perceptions within the internal government and the lack of public understanding regarding the substance of the KIK inventory, which is the main obstacle in implementing the inventory. Conclusion: Conclusion from the discussion, namely, first, the inventory of potential KIK is still experiencing problems and has an impact on the non-optimal legal protection of cultural works in East Kalimantan. Second, various efforts have been made by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, the Department of Education and Culture, and the community, but have not been able to synergize the entire system in implementing the inventory. As a recommendation regarding this matter, the first is to share perceptions and synergize between the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and the Education and Culture Office. Second, the inventory system must accommodate all social facts, objective realities, and consider local cultural values. Besides, special treatment is needed for the community by maximizing socialization, education, and assisting in the KIK inventory.